Clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy: Clinical article

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 187-194

  Nomura, Hiroshi ^a   Yanagisawa, Yoshikazu ^a   Arima, Junichi ^a   Oga, Masayoshi ^b  

^a ATOMIC BOMB SURVIVORS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b Hachisuga Neurosurgical Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Lumbar spinal stenosis; Lumbar spinous process splitting laminectomy; METRx microdiscectomy system; Minimally invasive surgery; Tubular retractor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION SCORE; LAMINECTOMY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LUMBAR DISK HERNIA; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROSCOPIC LUMBAR SPINOUS PROCESS SPLITTING LAMINECTOMY; MULTIFIDUS MUSCLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETRACTOR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

JOA = JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION; LBP = LOW-BACK PAIN; LSPSL = LUMBAR SPINOUS PROCESS-SPLITTING LAMINECTOMY; LSS = LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; LUMBAR SPINOUS PROCESS-SPLITTING LAMINECTOMY; METRX MICRODISCECTOMY SYSTEM; MILD = MUSCLE-PRESERVING INTERLAMINAR DECOMPRESSION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; TUBULAR RETRACTOR;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL STENOSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84905497542     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: 15475646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE1373     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fox MW, Onofrio BM, Onofrio BM, Hanssen AD: Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone. J Neurosurg 85:793-802, 1996 (Pubitemid 26362142)
2. Frazier DD, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN: Associations between spinal deformity and outcomes after decompression for spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:2025-2029, 1997
3. Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Sakamoto A, Yato Y, Harada T, Mikami Y, et al: Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E276-E280, 2009
4. Herron LD, Trippi AC: L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The results of treatment by decompressive laminectomy without fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:534-538, 1989
5. Hyun SJ, Kim YB, Kim YS, Park SW, Nam TK, Hong HJ, et al: Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle volume: comparison between paramedian interfascial and midline approaches for lumbar fusion. J Korean Med Sci 22:646-651, 2007
6. Iguchi T, Kurihara A, Nakayama J, Sato K, Kurosaka M, Yamasaki K: Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1754-1759, 2000
7. Iguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, Sato K, Kurihara A, Yoshiya S, et al: Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation? J Spinal Disord Tech 17:284-290, 2004
8. Izumida S, Inoue S: Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 60:391, 1986
9. Johnsson KE, Redlund-Johnell I, Udén A, Willner S: Preoperative and postoperative instability in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:591-593, 1989
10. Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K: Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11:107-110, 1986
11. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H: Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2598-2602, 1994
12. Kjaer P, Bendix T, Sorensen JS, Korsholm L, Leboeuf-Yde C: Are MRI-defined fat infiltrations in the multifidus muscles associated with low back pain? BMC Med 5:2, 2007
13. Lee JC, Cha JG, Kim Y, Kim YI, Shin BJ: Quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration in the patients with the degenerative lumbar flat back using a digital image analysis: comparison with the normal controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:318-325, 2008
14. Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R: Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system. J Neurosurg 97 (2 Suppl):213-217, 2002
15. Pao JL, Chen WC, Chen PQ: Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 18:672-678, 2009
16. Parkkola R, Rytökoski U, Kormano M: Magnetic resonance imaging of the discs and trunk muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:830-836, 1993
17. Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN: Degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of current trends and controversies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 (6 Suppl):S71-S81, 2005
18. Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN: Lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment strategies and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 34:281-295, 2003 (Pubitemid 36741153)
19. Sonntag VK, Marciano FF: Is fusion indicated for lumbar spinal disorders? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 (24 Suppl):138S-142S, 1995
20. Watanabe K, Hosoya T, Shiraishi T, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y: Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 3:405-408, 2005
21. White AA III, Panjabi MM: Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, ed 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1990, pp 351-357
22. Yagi M, Okada E, Ninomiya K, Kihara M: Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 10:293-299, 2009