Minimally invasive surgical approach compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the feasibility and safety

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 296-305

  Lei, Purun ^a   Wei, Bo ^a   Guo, Weiping ^a   Wei, Hongbo ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; Meta analysis; Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Indexed keywords

BILE LEAKAGE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COCHRANE LIBRARY; EMBASE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REOPERATION; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOMACH EMPTYING; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WOUND INFECTION; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PROCEDURES;

HUMANS; LAPAROTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OPERATIVE TIME; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84905489801     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000054     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 1935;102:763-779.
2. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, et al. One hundred and forty five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg. 1993;217:430-435; discussion 435-8.
3. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a singleinstitution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1199-1210; discussion 1210-1211.
4. McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, et al. Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg. 2007;246:246-253.
5. Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:408-410.
6. Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al. Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003;13:33-36.
7. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003;138:777-784.
8. Kim SC, Song KB, Jung YS, et al. Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic pyloruspreserving pancreatoduodenectomy: improvement with surgical experience. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:95-103.
9. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy-a comparative study. Int J Surg. 2012;10:475-479.
10. Kuroki T, Adachi T, Okamoto T, et al. A non-randomized comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterol. 2012;59:570-573.
11. Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc. 2012;26: 2397-2402.
12. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:810-819.
13. Zureikat AH, Breaux JA, Steel JL, et al. Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented? J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:1151-1157.
14. Zhou NX, Chen JZ, Liu Q, et al. Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7:131-137.
15. Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, et al. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg. 2011;35:2739-2746.
16. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. Oxford, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336-341.
18. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. JAMA. 2000;283: 2008-2012.
19. Phillips BBC, Sackett D, et al. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Web site. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o= 1025. Accessed December 4, 2012.
20. Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet Oncol. 2001;358:870-875.
21. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Web site. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/ clinicalepidemiology/ oxford.asp. Accessed March 15, 2012.
22. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13.
23. Cho A, Yamamoto H, Nagata M, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy- assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease. Am J Surg. 2009;198:445-449.
24. Ito M, Horiguchi A, Ishihara S, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: totally laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and reconstruction. Pancreas. 2009;38:1009.
25. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8-13.
26. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142:761-768.
27. Satyadas T, Kanhere HA, Lauder C, et al. Evolution in technique of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:367-368.
28. Briggs CD, Mann CD, Irving GR, et al. Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1129-1137.
29. Winer J, Can MF, Bartlett DL, et al. The current state of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9:468-476.
30. Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Signori S, et al. Analysis of instrument traffic during laparoscopic robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB. 2012;14:689.