Modeling the effectiveness of mitigation measures on the diazinon label

ACS Symposium Series

Volumn 1075, Issue , 2011, Pages 227-257

  Snyder, Nathan J ^a   Williams, W Martin ^a   Denton, Debra L ^b   Bongard, Christian ^a  

^a Waterborne Environmental Inc   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANALS; LAND USE; PESTICIDES; STREAM FLOW; SURFACE WATERS; WATER QUALITY;

AGRICULTURAL USE; DORMANT PERIOD; DRAINAGE CANALS; EFFECTIVE TOOL; MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; MITIGATION MEASURES; SACRAMENTO RIVER; WATER QUALITY MODELING;

MONITORING;

EID: 84905485530     PISSN: 00976156     EISSN: 19475918     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2011-1075.ch015     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Pesticide Root Zone Model Field and Orchard Crop Scenario Metadata. Pesticides: Science and Policy. Updated September 28, 2004. http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/metadata. htm.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision: Diazinon. EPA 738-R-04-006; Office of Pesticide Programs, May 2004.
3. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). NWISWeb Data for the Nation. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis (verified July 21, 2004).
4. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). USGS National Water Quality Assessment Data Warehouse.http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa (verified Nov. 11, 2004).
5. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). http://nhd.usgs.gov/(verified Nov. 11, 2004).
6. Central Valley Region Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB). Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Orchard Runoff Into the Sacramento and Feather Rivers; 2003.
7. Sacramento River Watershed Program (SRWP). Annual Monitoring Report: 2000-2001; June 2002.
8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Tier two screening model shell for pesticide aquatic exposure assessment. (P)RZM (E)XAMS model shell, version (5).0 user's manual; Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, 2006. http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index. htm#przmexamsshell.
9. Suárez, L. A. PRZM-3, A Model for Predicting Pesticide and Nitrogen Fate in the Crop Root and Unsaturated Soil Zones: Users Manual for Release 3.12.2; National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Athens, GA, 2005.
10. Parker, R.; Arnold, J. G.; Barrett, M.; Burns, L.; Carrubba, L.; Neitsch, S. L.; Snyder, N. J.; Srinivasan, R. Evaluation of Three Watershed-Scale Pesticide Environmental Transport and Fate Models. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2007, 43 (6), 1424-1443.
11. Briggs, K. A.; Oliver, M. Technical Memorandum: Study of Diazinon Runoff in the Main Canal Basin During the Winter 2000-2001 Dormant Spray Season; SRWP OP Focus Group, 2002.
12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (USEPA). Revised Tier 2 EEC's for Diazinon. Memorandum dated November 14, 2000 from R. David Jones, Ph.D., Senior Agronomist to Danette Drew, Health Effects Division, 33 pages.
13. National Climatic Data Center. Climate Data Online. http://www.ncdc.noaa. gov/oa/ncdc.html (verified July 21, 2004).
14. California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CADPR). Pesticide Use Reporting (PUR) Database, 2004. http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/purmain.htm.
15. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2000a. Environmental Risk Assessment for Diazinon, Revised Science Chapter; October 2000, 77 pages.
16. Central Valley Region Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB). Draft Program of Implementation Report for the Control of Diazinon in the Sacramento and Feather Rivers; California Environmental Protection Agency, May 2002.
17. Neitsch, S. L.; Arnold, J. G.; Kiniry, J. R.Williams,J. R.; King, K. W. Soil And Water Assessment Tool, Theoretical Documentation, Version 2000; Grassland, Soil And Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, 2002.
18. Watanabe, H.; Grismer, M. Numerical modeling of diazinon transport through inter-row vegetative filter strips. J. Environ. Manage. 2003, 69, 157-168.
19. Teske, M. E.; Bird, S. L.; Esterly, D. M.; Ray, S. L.; Perry, S. G. A User's Guide for AgDRIFT® 2.03; Technical Note No. 95-10; CDI: Princeton, NJ, U.S.A., 2001.
20. Denton, D. L.; Moore, M. T.; Cooper, C. M.; Wrysinski, J.; Williams, W. M.; Miller, J. L.; Reece, K.; Crane, D.; Robins, P. Mitigation of Permethrin in Irrigation Runoff by Vegetated Agricultural Drainage Ditches in California. In Synthetic Pyrethroids: Occurrence and Behavior in Aquatic Environments; ACS Symposium Series; Gan, J., Spurlock, F., Hendley, P., Weston, D. P., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2008; Vol. 991.
21. Winchell, M. A Comparison of Four Models for Simulating the Effectiveness of Vegetative Filter Strips at Reducing Off-Target Movement of Pesticides. Prepared by Stone Environmental, Inc., for CropLife America, 2010; 81 pages.
22. Coalition for Urban/Rural Environmental Stewardship (CURES). Management Practices for Protecting Surface Water During Dormant Orchard Applications; 2004.
23. Kröger, R.; Moore, M.; Cooper, C. M.; Holland, M. M. Diazinon Accumulation and Dissipation in Oryza sativa L. Following Simulated Agricultural Runoff Amendment in Flooded Rice Paddies. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009, 201, 209-218.
24. Moore, M. T.; Kröger, R.; Cooper, C. M.; Cullum, R. F.; Smith, S.; Locke, M. A. Diazinon Reduction and Partitioning Between Water, Sediment, and Vegetation in Stormwater Runoff Mitigation through Rice Fields. Pest Manage. Sci. 2009, 65, 1182-1188.
25. Central Valley Region Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB). Reporting watershed improvement (SP-12). Improving California Central Valley Watersheds: Diazinon Reduction in the Feather and Sacramento Rivers, 2010; 21 pages.