Universally design social policy: When disability disappears?

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 16, 2014, Pages 1320-1327

  Bickenbach, Jerome ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUCERNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Disability; Human rights; Social policy; Universal design

Indexed keywords

CIVIL RIGHTS; DISABLED PERSON; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; UNITED NATIONS;

CIVIL RIGHTS; DISABLED PERSONS; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; UNITED NATIONS;

EID: 84905459787     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.932447     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Zola IK. Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy. Milbank Quart 1989;67:401-18
2. Oliver M. The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan and St Martins Press; 1990
3. Hahn H. The political implications of disability definitions and data. Disab Pol Stud 1993;4:41-52
4. Barnes C, Mercer G, Shakespeare T, eds. Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. New York: Polity; 1999
5. Bickenbach JE, Cieza A. The prospects for universal disability law and social policy. J Accessibil Design 2011;1:23-37
6. Imrie R. Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment. Dis Rehabil 2012;34:873-82
7. Ville I, Ravaud J-F. French disability studies: Differences and similarities. Scand J Dis Res 2007;9:138-45
8. Minow M. Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 1990
9. UNRISD. Combatting poverty and inequality: Structural change, social policy and politics. Geneva: UNRISD; 2010
10. Hamraie Aimi. Universal design research as a new materialist practice. Disab Stud Quart 2012;32:4
11. Hamraie Aimi. Designing collective access: A feminist disability theory of universal design. Disab Stud Quart 2013;33:4
12. Lid Inger Marie. Developing the theoretical content in universal design. Scand J Disabil Res 2013;15:203-15
13. United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, G.A. Res. 61/106: 2006. Available from: Http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/ rights/convtexte.htm [last accessed 14 Jun 2014].
14. Bickenbach JE. Ethics, law and policy: Volume IV of the Sage disability resource library. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2012
15. Stone D. The disabled state. Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press; 1984
16. Bickenbach JE. Physical disability and social policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1993
17. Stapleton DC, Burkhauser R, eds. The decline in employment of people with disabilities: A policy puzzle. Kalamazoo (MI): W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; 2003
18. Berkowitz ED. Disability policy: America's programs for the handicap. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1987
19. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Stobo JD, McGeary M, Barnes D K, eds. Improving the social security disability decision process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2007
20. Bagenstos S. Law and contradictions of the disability rights movement. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 2009
21. Scotch RK, Schriner K. Disability as human variation: Implications for policy. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 1997;549:148-59
22. Mace RL, Hardie GJ, Place JP. Accessible environments: Toward universal design. In: Preiser WE, Vischer JC, White ET, eds. Design intervention: Toward a more humane architecture. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1991:155-80
23. Story FS, Mueller JL, Mace RL. The universal design file: Designing for people of all ages and abilities. Raleigh (NC): North Carolina State University, The Center for Universal Design; 1998
24. Imrie R, Hall P. Inclusive design. London: Routledge; 2001
25. Iwarsson S, Ståhl A. Accessibility, usability and universal design - positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:57-66
26. Crews DE, Zavotka S. Aging, disability, and frailty: Implications for universal design. J Phys Anthrol 2006;25:113-18
27. Pullin G. Design meets disability. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; 2009
28. Litvak S, Enders A. The interface between individuals and environments. In: Albrecht G, Seelman K, Bury M, eds. Handbook of disability studies. London: Sage Publications; 2001;711-33
29. Gliedman J, Roth W. The unexpected minority: Handicapped children in America. New York (NY): Harcourt; 1980
30. Colker R. The disability integration presumption: Thirty years later. U Penn Law Rev 2005;154:789-852
31. Winance M. Pain, disability and rehabilitation practices. A phenomenological perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2006;18:1109-18
32. Nicholls DA, Gibson BE. The body and physiotherapy. Physiol Theory Pract 2010:26:497-509
33. Fraser N, Gordon L. A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. J Women Cult Soc 1994;19:309-36
34. Mkandawire T. Targeting and universalism in poverty reduction. Programme on Social Policy and Development, Paper No. 23. Geneva: UNRISD; 2005
35. Huber E, Stephens J D. Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago; 2001
36. Müller K. Privatising old-age security. Latin America and Eastern Europe compared. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2003
37. UNRISD. Commercialization and Globalization of Health Care: Lessons from UNRISD research. Research and Policy Brief No. 7. Geneva: UNRISD; 2007
38. Albrecht G. The disability business: Rehabilitation in America. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1992
39. Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1990
40. Esping-Andersen G. Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999
41. Scotch RK. From good will to civil rights: Transforming federal disability policy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press; 2011
42. Shapiro J. No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: New York Times Books; 1993
43. Zames FD, Zames F. The disability rights movement: From charity to confrontation. Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press; 2001
44. Ostroff E. Universal design: The new paradigm. In: Preiser W, Ostroff E, eds. Universal design handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001:1.3-1.12
45. Van Parijs P. Why surfers should be fed: The liberal case for an unconditional basic income. Phil Pub Aff 1991:20:101-31
46. Van Parijs P. Basic income: A simple and powerful idea for the 21st century. Basic Income European Network, VIII International Congress; 2000; Berlin
47. Sen A. Inequality reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992
48. Sen A. Development as freedom. New York: Knopf; 1999
49. Tobias J. Universal design: Is it really about design?. Inform Technol Disabil 2002;9:2
50. D'Souza, N. Is universal design a critical theory?. In: Keates S, Clarkson J, Langdon P, Robinson P, eds. Designing a more inclusive world. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004:3-10
51. Gibson BE, Carnevale FA, King G. "This is my way": Reimagining disability, in/dependence and interconnectedness of persons and assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1894-9
52. Mégret Frédéric. The disabilities convention: Human rights of persons with disabilities or disability rights?. Hum Rights Quart 2008;30:494-516
53. Bickenbach JE. Disability, culture and the UN convention. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1111-24.