A new degassing membrane coupled upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor to achieve in-situ biogas upgrading and recovery of dissolved CH4 from the anaerobic effluent

Applied Energy

Volumn 132, Issue , 2014, Pages 536-542

  Luo, Gang ^a   Wang, Wen ^b   Angelidaki, Irini ^c  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Degassing membrane; In situ biogas upgrading; UASB

Indexed keywords

BIOGAS; CARBON DIOXIDE; DEGASSING; DESORPTION; LIQUIDS; METHANE; RECOVERY;

ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS; BIOGAS UPGRADING; COD REMOVAL EFFICIENCY; OPERATIONAL PERIODS; RECIRCULATION RATES; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; UASB; UP-FLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BLANKET REACTORS;

COUPLED CIRCUITS;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; DEGASSING; DESORPTION; DISSOLUTION; EFFLUENT; MEMBRANE; METHANE; SLUDGE;

EID: 84905438539     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.059     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Luo G., Johansson S., Boe K., Xie L., Zhou Q., Angelidaki I. Simultaneous hydrogen utilization and in situ biogas upgrading in an anaerobic reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 2012, 109:1088-1094.
2. Pires J., Saini V.K., Pinto M.s.L. Studies on selective adsorption of biogas components on pillared clays: approach for biogas improvement. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42:8727-8732.
3. 2 facilitated transport membrane. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:638-646.
4. 2 retention at autogenerated biogas pressures up to 20bar. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46:1895-1902.
5. Nordberg A., Edstrom M., Uusi-Penttila M., Rasmuson A.C. Selective desorption of carbon dioxide from sewage sludge for in-situ methane enrichment: enrichment experiments in pilot scale. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 37:196-204.
6. Lindberg A., Rasmuson A.C. Selective desorption of carbon dioxide from sewage sludge for in situ methane enrichment - Part 1: pilot-plant experiments. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006, 95:794-803.
7. 2 diffusion for efficient in situ biogas upgrading in an anaerobic reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97:3739-3744.
8. Bandara W.M.K.R.T.W., Satoh H., Sasakawa M., Nakahara Y., Takahashi M., Okabe S. Removal of residual dissolved methane gas in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating low-strength wastewater at low temperature with degassing membrane. Water Res 2011, 45:3533-3540.
9. Hatamoto M., Miyauchi T., Kindaichi T., Ozaki N., Ohashi A. Dissolved methane oxidation and competition for oxygen in down-flow hanging sponge reactor for post-treatment of anaerobic wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:10299-10304.
10. Hatamoto M., Yamamoto H., Kindaichi T., Ozaki N., Ohashi A. Biological oxidation of dissolved methane in effluents from anaerobic reactors using a down-flow hanging sponge reactor. Water Res 2010, 44:1409-1418.
11. Angelidaki I., Ellegaard L., Ahring B.K. Compact automated displacement gas metering system for measurement of low gas rates from labratory fermenters. Biotechnol Bioeng 1992, 39:351-353.
12. Lens P.N.L., Van den Bosch M.C., Hulshoff Pol L.W., Lettinga G. Effect of staging on volatile fatty acid degradation in a sulfidogenic granular sludge reactor. Water Res 1998, 32:1178-1192.
13. Angelidaki I., Sanders W. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2004, 3:117-129.
14. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. New York, USA: American Public Health Association; 1995.
15. Yu Y.H., Ramsay J.A., Ramsay B.A. On-line estimation of dissolved methane concentration during methanotrophic fermentations. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006, 95:788-793.
16. Luo G., Xie L., Zhou Q., Angelidaki I. Enhancement of bioenergy production from organic wastes by two-stage anaerobic hydrogen and methane production process. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:8700-8706.
17. Snoeyink V.L., Jenkins D. Water chemistry 1980, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
18. Leiknes T., Semmens M.J. Vacuum degassing using microporous hollow fiber membranes. Sep Purif Technol 2001, 22-23:287-294.
19. Pauss A., Andre G., Perrier M., Guiot S.R. Liquid-to-gas mass-transfer in anaerobic processses-inevitable transfer limitations of methane and hydrogen in the biomethanation process. Appl Environ Microbiol 1990, 56:1636-1644.
20. 2-utilization efficiency using a membrane carbonation photobioreactor (MCPBR). Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:5032-5038.
21. 2 removal in hollow fibre membrane modules. Sep Purif Technol 1998, 13:79-88.
22. Shao P., Dal-Cin M., Kumar A., Li H., Singh D.P. Design and economics of a hybrid membrane-temperature swing adsorption process for upgrading biogas. J Membr Sci 2012, 413-414:17-28.
23. van der Ha D., Bundervoet B., Verstraete W., Boon N. A sustainable, carbon neutral methane oxidation by a partnership of methane oxidizing communities and microalgae. Water Res 2011, 45:2845-2854.
24. Cakir F.Y., Stenstrom M.K. Greenhouse gas production: a comparison between aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment technology. Water Res 2005, 39:4197-4203.
25. 2 emissions from sewage treatment: an anaerobic migrating bed reactor pilot plant study. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006, 95:384-398.
26. Liang T.M., Cheng S.S., Wu K.L. Behavioral study on hydrogen fermentation reactor installed with silicone rubber membrane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2002, 27:1157-1165.
27. Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85:849-860.