Grammaticalization and English complex prepositions: A corpus-based study

Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions: A Corpus-Based Study

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-214

  Hoffmann, Sebastian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905291425     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203008225     Document Type: Book

References (178)

1. Aarts, F. (1971) 'On the distribution of noun-phrase types in English clausestructure', Lingua, 26: 281-93.
2. Aarts, J. (1991) 'Intuition-based and observation-based grammars', in K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds) English Corpus Linguistics. Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, London: Longman, pp. 44-62.
3. Aijmer, K. (1986) 'Discourse variation and hedging', in J. Aarts and W. Meijs (eds) Corpus Linguistics II. New Studies in the Analysis and Exploitation of Computer Corpora, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 1-18.
4. Aijmer, K. (1996) Conversational Routines in English, London: Longman.
5. Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (2001) 'The discourse of medical encounters', in D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. E. Hamilton (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 453-69.
6. Akimoto, M. (1996) 'Functional change in P1+NP+P2 phrases', in B. Hoffer (ed.) LACUS 22: The Twenty-Second LACUS Forum 1995, Chapel Hill, NC: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States, pp. 310-19.
7. Akimoto, M. (1999) 'The idiomatization and grammaticalization of complex prepositions', in S. J. J. Hwang and A. R. Lommel (eds) LACUS Forum XXV, Fullerton, CA: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States, pp. 389-97.
8. Altenberg, B. (1986) 'Contrastive linking in spoken and written English', in G. Tottie and I. Bäcklund (eds) English in Speech and Writing A Symposium, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Anglistica Upsaliensis 60, Uppsala: Almquist and Wiksell, pp. 13-40.
9. Andersen, G. (1996) ' "They like wanna see like how we talk and all that": the use of like as a discourse marker in London teenage speech', in M. Ljung (ed.) Corpus-Based Studies in English, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 37-48.
10. Aston, G. and Burnard, L. (1998) The BNC Handbook. Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
11. Bailey, C.-J. N. and Maroldt, K. (1977) 'The French lineage of English', in J. M. Meisel (ed.) Langues en contact - Pidgins - Creoles - Languages in Contact, Tübingen: Gunter Narr, pp. 21-53.
12. Ball, C. N. (1994) 'Automated text analysis: cautionary tales', Literary and Linguistic Computing, 9(4): 295-302.
13. Barth, D. (2000) ' "That's true, although really not, but still": expressing concession in spoken English', in E. Couper-Kuhlen and B. Kortmann (eds) Cause - Condition - Concession - Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, Berlin: Mouton, pp. 411-37.
14. Beneš, E. (1974) 'Präpositionswertige Präpositionalwendungen', in U. Engel and P. Grebe (eds) Sprachsystem und Sprachgebrauch, Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann, pp. 33-52.
15. Berg, D. L. (1991) A User's Guide to the Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Bertoncini, E. (1973) 'A tentative frequency list of Swahili words', Annali dell' Istituto Orientale di Napoli, 33 (n.s. 23): 297-363.
17. Biaduń-Grabarek, H. (1991) 'Zur Bestimmung und Abgrenzung der präpositionsartigen Präpositionalphrasen', in E. Feldbusch, R. Pogarell and C. Weiss (eds) Neue Fragen der Linguistik. Band 1: Bestand und Entwicklung, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 321-7.
18. Biber, D. (1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Biber, D. (1993) 'Representativeness in corpus design', Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4): 243-57.
20. Biber, D. (1994) 'An analytical framework for register studies', in D. Biber and E. Finegan (eds) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31-56.
21. Biber, D., Finegan, E. and Atkinson, D. (1994) 'ARCHER and its challenges: compiling and exploring a representative corpus of historical English registers', in U. Fries, G. Tottie and P. Schneider (eds) Creating and Using English Language Corpora, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 1-14.
22. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
23. Bolinger, D. L. (1961) 'Syntactic blends and other matters', Language, 37(3): 366-81.
24. Bopp, F. (1816) Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprachen, Frankfurt: Andreäische.
25. Brinton, L. J. (1996) Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions, Berlin: Mouton.
26. Brinton, L. J. (in press) 'The development of I mean: implications for the study of historical pragmatics', in S. M. Fitzmaurice and I. Taavitsainen (eds) Methods of Historical Pragmatics: Recovering Speaker Meaning and Reader Inference, Berlin: Mouton.
27. Brown, G. (1977) Listening to Spoken English, London: Longman.
28. Burnard, L. (2000) Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (World Edition). Online, available at: http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/World/urg.pdf (accessed 2 February 2003).
29. Butterworth, B. (1975) 'Hesitation and semantic planning in speech', Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4: 75-87.
30. Bybee, J. L. (1985) Morphology: A Study of the Relationship Between Meaning and Form, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Bybee, J. L. (2001) 'Frequency effects on French liaison', in J. Bybee and P. Hopper (eds) Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 337-59.
32. Bybee, J. L. (2003) 'Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency', in B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds) Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 602-23.
33. Bybee, J. L. and Thompson, S. (2000) 'Three frequency effects in syntax', Berkeley Linguistic Society, 23: 378-88.
34. Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. and Pagliuca, W. (1994) The Evolution of Grammar, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
35. Campbell, L. (2001) 'What's wrong with grammaticalization?', Language Sciences, 23: 113-61.
36. Chafe, W. (1979) 'The flow of thought and the flow of language', in T. Givón (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, New York: Academic Press, pp. 159-81.
37. Chambers Dictionary of Etymology (CDE) (1998) R. K. Barnhart (ed.) Edinburgh: Chambers.
38. Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Chomsky, N. (1975) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, New York and London: Plenum Press.
40. Clark, H. H. and Clark, E. V. (1977) Psychology and Language. An Introduction to Psycholinguistics, New York: Harecourt Brace Jovanovich.
41. Condillac, E. B. de (1746) Essai sur l'origine des connaissances humaines, Paris.
42. Croft, W. (1990) Typology and Universals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Croft, W. (2000) Explaining Language Change: an Evolutionary Approach, Harlow: Longman.
44. Crystal, D. (2001) Language and the Internet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Davidson, A. and Lutz, R. (1985) 'Measuring syntactic complexity relative to discourse context', in D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen and A. Zwicky (eds) Natural Language Parsing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26-66.
46. de Beaugrande, R. (1997) New Foundations for a Science of Text and Discourse: Cognition, Communication, and the Freedom of Access to Knowledge and Society, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47. de Haan, P. (1987) 'Exploring the linguistic database: noun phrase complexity and language variation', in W. Meijs (ed.) Corpus Linguistics and Beyond, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 151-65.
48. de Mönnink, I. (2000) On the Move. The Mobility of Constituents in the English Noun Phrase: a Multi-method Approach, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
49. Denison, D. (1993) English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions, London and New York: Longman.
50. Detges, U. and Waltereit, R. (2002) 'Reanalysis vs. grammaticalization: a semanticpragmatic account of functional change in grammar', Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 21(2): 151-95.
51. Di Meola, C. (2000) Die Grammatikalisierung deutscher Präpositionen, Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
52. Di Micello, P. (1992) 'History and philosophy of Project Gutenberg.' Project Gutenberg Official Home Site. Online, available at: http://promo.net/pg/history.html (accessed 2 August 2004).
53. Dictionaire historique de la langue française (MED) (1992) A. Rey (ed.), Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.
54. Diller, H.-J. (2001) 'Genre in linguistic and related discourses', in H.-J. Diller and M. Görlach (eds) Towards a History of English as a History of Genres, Heidelberg: C. Winter, pp. 3-43.
55. Earle, J. (1892) The Philology of the English Tongue (5th edn), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Edmondson, W. (1981) Spoken Discourse: a Model for Analysis, London: Longman.
57. Eggins, S. and Martin, J. R. (1997) 'Genres and registers of discourse', in T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process, London: Sage, pp. 230-56.
58. Erman, B. and Kotsinas, U.-B. (1993) 'Pragmaticalization: the case of ba' and you know', Studier i modern språkvetenskap. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, new series 10, pp. 76-93.
59. Esser, J. (1993) English Linguistic Stylistics, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
60. Ferguson, Ch. (1994) 'Dialect, register, and genre: working assumptions about conventionalization', in D. Biber and E. Finegan (eds) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15-30.
61. Fischer, O., van Kemenade, A., Koopman, W. and van der Wurff, W. (2000) The Syntax of Early English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Fowler, H. W. (1965) A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (2nd edn), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Französisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch, vol. 10 (1962) W. Wartburg (ed.), Basel: R. G. Zbinden & Co.
64. Fries, U. (1994) 'ZEN - Zurich English Newspaper Corpus', in M. Kytö, M. Rissanen and S. Wright (eds) Corpora Across the Centuries, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 17-18.
65. Gildon, Ch. and Brightland, J. (1711) A Grammar of the English Tongue, London: John Brightland. Facsimile reprint (1967), Menston: The Scolar Press.
66. Givón, T (1992) 'The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions', Linguistics, 30(1): 5-55.
67. Givón, T (1993) English Grammar: A Function-based Introduction. Volume I, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
68. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1972) 'Pauses, clauses, sentences', Language and Speech, 15: 103-13.
69. Greatbatch, D. (1988) 'A turn-taking system for British news interviews', Language in Society, 17: 401-30.
70. Greenberg, J. H. (1966) Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies, The Hague: Mouton.
71. Grice, H. P. (1975) 'Logic and conversation', in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
72. Haegeman, L. (1991) Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, Oxford: Blackwell.
73. Haiman, J. (1994) 'Ritualization and the development of language', in W. Pagliuca (ed.) Perspectives on Grammaticalization, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3-28.
74. Haspelmath, M. (1998) 'Does grammaticalization need reanalysis?', Studies in Language, 22: 315-51.
75. Haspelmath, M. (2004) 'On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization', in O. Fischer, M. Norde and H. Perridon (eds) Up and Down the Cline - the Nature of Grammaticalization, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 17-44.
76. Heine, B. (2003) 'Grammaticalization', in B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds) Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 575-601.
77. Heine, B., Claudi, U. and Hünnemeyer, F. (1991) Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
78. Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1991) 'On the institutional character of institutional talk: the case of news interviews', in D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure. Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 93-137.
79. Hoffmann, S. (2002) 'In (hot) pursuit of data: complex prepositions in Late Modern English', in P. Peters, P. Collins and A. Smith (eds) New Frontiers of Corpus Research, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 127-46.
80. Hopper, P. J. (1991) 'On some principles in grammaticalization', in E. C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds) Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 1, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 17-35.
81. Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C. (2003) Grammaticalization (2nd edn), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Horn, L. R. (1988) 'Pragmatic theory', in F. J. Newmeyer (ed.) Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113-45.
83. Huddleston, R. (1988) English Grammar: an Outline, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Humboldt, W. von (1825) 'Über das Entstehen der grammatischen Formen und ihren Einfluß auf die Ideenentwicklung: Gelesen in der Akademie der Wissenschaften am 17. Januar 1822', Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, pp. 401-30.
86. Hunston, S. (2002) Corpora in Applied Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. Hyland, K. (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
88. Jespersen, O. (1909-49) A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, 7 vols, London: Allen & Unwin.
89. Johansson, S. (1996) 'Introducing the machine-readable Oxford English Dictionary', Image, 3(1): 19-38.
90. Joos, M. (1961) The Five Clocks: a Linguistic Excursion into the Five Styles of English Usage, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
91. Joseph, B. D. (2001) 'Is there such a thing as "grammaticalization"?', Language Sciences, 23: 163-86.
92. Jucker, A. H. (1994) 'New dimensions in vocabulary studies: review article of the Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edition) on CD-ROM', Literary and Linguistic Computing, 9(2): 149-54.
93. Keränen, J. (1998) 'The corpus of Early English correspondence: progress report', in A. Renouf (ed.) Explorations in Corpus Linguistics, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 29-37.
94. Klégr, A. (2002) English Complex Prepositions of the Type In Spite Of and Analogous Sequences. A Study & Dictionary, Prague: Charles University, The Karolinum Press.
95. König, E. (1985) 'Concessive connectives in English', Lingua, 66: 1-19.
96. König, E. (1994) 'Concessive clauses' in R. E. Asher and J. M. Y. Simpson (eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 2, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 679-81.
97. Krug, M. (1998a) 'British English is developing a new discourse marker, innit? A study in lexicalization based on social, regional and stylistic variation', Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2: 145-97.
98. Krug, M. (1998b) 'String frequency', Journal of English Linguistics, 26(4): 286-320.
99. Krug, M. (2000) Emerging English Modals. A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization, Berlin: Mouton.
100. Kruisinga, E. (1932) A Handbook of Present-day English. Part II: English Accidence and Syntax (5th edn), Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
101. Kurylowicz, J. (1965) 'The evolution of grammatical categories', Diogenes, 51: 55-71; reprinted in Esquisses Linguistiques II (1975), München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 38-54.
102. Kytö, M. (comp.) (1996) Manual to the Diachronic Part of The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Coding Conventions and Source Texts (3rd edn), Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
103. Labov, W. (1969) 'Contraction and variability of the English copula', Language, 45(4): 715-62.
104. Lakoff, G. (1972) 'Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts', Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, 8: 183-228.
105. Langacker, R. W. (1977) 'Syntactic reanalysis', in Ch. N. Li (ed.) Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 57-139.
106. Langacker, R. W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
107. Lee, D. Y. W. (2001) 'Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle', Language Learning & Technology, 5(3): 37-72.
108. Leech, G. and Smith, N. (2000a) Manual to Accompany The British National Corpus (Version 2) with Improved Word-class Tagging, Lancaster: UCREL. [Supplied in digital form as part of the BNC World Edition.] Online, available at: http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/World/HTML/bnc2postag_manual.htm (accessed 2 August 2004).
109. Leech, G. and Smith, N. (2000b) 'List of multiwords and associated tags in BNC2'. Online, available at: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/ucrel/bnc2/multiwd.htm (accessed 2 August 2004).
110. Leech, G. and Smith, N. (2000c) 'Automatic POS-tagging of the corpus'. Online, available at: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/ucrel/bnc2/bnc2autotag.htm (accessed 2 August 2004).
111. Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1975) A Communicative Grammar of English, London: Longman.
112. Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1996) A Communicative Grammar of English (2nd edn), London: Longman.
113. Leech, G., Garside, R. and Bryant, M. (1994) 'CLAWS4: the tagging of the British National Corpus', in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 94), Kyoto, Japan, pp. 622-8.
114. Leech, G., Rayson, P. and Wilson, A. (2001) Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus, London: Longman.
115. Lehmann, Chr. (1982) Thoughts on Grammaticalization. A Programmatic Sketch, vol. 1, Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts 48. Köln: Universität zu Köln, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Reprinted in Thoughts on Grammaticalization (1995), LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, München: LINCOM Europa.
116. Lehmann, Chr. (1991) 'Grammaticalization and related changes in contemporary German', in E. C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds) Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 2, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 493-535.
117. Lehrer, A. (1998) 'Scapes, holics, and thons: the semantics of English combining forms', American Speech, 72(1): 3-28.
118. Lindquist, H. and Levin, M. (2000) 'Apples and oranges: on comparing data from different corpora', in Chr. Mair and M. Hundt (eds) Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 201-13.
119. Lowth, R. (1762) A Short Introduction to English Grammar, London: J. Hughs for A. Millar and for R. & J. Dodsley. Facsimile reprint (1968) Menston: The Scolar Press.
120. McEnery, T. and Wilson, A. (2003) Corpus Linguistics (2nd edn), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
121. Maclay, H. and Osgood, Ch. E. (1959) 'Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech', Word, 15: 19-44.
122. Mahl, G. F. (1956) 'Disturbances and silences in the patient's speech in psychotherapy', The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53(1): 1-15.
123. Mair, Chr. (2004) 'Corpus linguistics and grammaticalization theory. Statistics, frequencies and beyond', in H. Lindquist and Chr. Mair (eds) Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 121-50.
124. Mair, Chr. and Hundt, M. (1995) 'Why is the progressive becoming more frequent in English? A corpus-based investigation of language change in progress', Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 43(2): 111-22.
125. Markus, M. (1999) Manual of ICAMET (Innsbruck Computer-Archive of Machine-Readable English Texts), Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft, Anglistische Reihe, vol. 7. Innsbruck: Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Institut für Anglistik.
126. Mätzner, E. (1873) Englische Grammatik. Erster Theil: Die Lehre vom Worte (2nd edn), Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
127. Maxwell, M. (Summer Institute of Linguistics. Mike_Maxwell@sil.org) (26th April 2001, 3:53pm) 'Re: Corpora: Chomsky and corpus linguistics', in Corpora List [Internet]. Archived at: http://www.hit.uib.no/corpora/2001-2/0056.html (accessed 2 August 2004).
128. Maynard, D. W. (1991) 'Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse', American Journal of Sociology, 97: 448-95.
129. Meillet, A. (1912) 'L'évolution des formes grammaticales', Scientia (Rivista di Scienza), 12, no. 26.6. Reprinted in Linguistique historique et linguistique générale (1958), Paris: Champion, pp. 130-48.
130. Middle English Dictionary (MED) (1954-) H. Kurat, Sh. M. Kuhn and R. E. Lewis (eds), Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
131. Mindt, D. and Weber, Chr. (1989) 'Prepositions in American and British English', World Englishes, 8(2): 229-38.
132. Murray, J. A. H. (1888) A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles, vol. 1, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
133. Murray, J. A. H., Murray, H., Bradley, W. A., Craigie, W. A. and Onions, C. T. (eds) (1933) The Oxford English Dictionary, 1st edn, 12 vols, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
134. Murray, L. (1795) English Grammar, York: Wilson, Spence, and Mawman. Facsimile reprint (1968), Menston: The Scolar Press.
135. Newmeyer, F. J. (1998) Language Form and Language Function, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
136. Newmeyer, F. J. (2001) 'Deconstructing grammaticalization', Language Sciences, 23: 187-229.
137. Ochs, E. (1979) 'Planned and unplanned discourse', in T. Givón (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, New York: Academic Press, pp. 51-80.
138. The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) 2nd edn, 20 vols (1989) J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner (eds), Oxford: Clarendon Press. CD-ROM edition (1992).
139. Paul, H. (1920) Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte (5th edn), Halle: Max Niemeyer.
140. Pawley, A. and Syder, F. H. (1983) 'Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency', in J. C. Richards and R. W. Schmidt (eds) Language and Communication, London: Longman, pp. 191-226.
141. Peters, P. (2001) 'Varietal effects. The influence of American English on Australian and British English', in B. Moore (ed.) Who's Centric Now? The Present State of Post-Colonial Englishes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 297-309.
142. Priestley, J. (1761) Rudiments of English Grammar, London: Griffiths. Facsimile reprint (1969) Menston: The Scolar Press.
143. Quirk, R. and Mulholland, J. (1964) 'Complex prepositions and related sequences', English Studies (Supplement: Festschrift for R. W. Zandvoort), 45: 64-73.
144. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.
145. Radford, A. (1997) Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146. Rissanen, M. (1989) 'Three problems connected with the use of diachronic corpora', ICAME Journal, 13: 16-19.
147. Rissanen, M. (2000) 'Paths of loan-word grammaticalization: the case of according to', in Chr. Dalton-Puffer and N. Ritt (eds) Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky, Berlin: Mouton, pp. 249-62.
148. Rissanen, M. (2002) 'Despite or notwithstanding? On the development of concessive prepositions in English', in A. Fischer, G. Tottie and H. M. Lehmann (eds) Text Types and Corpora. Studies in Honour of Udo Fries, Tübingen: Gunter Narr, pp. 191-203.
149. Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. and Palander-Collin, M. (eds) (1993) Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus, Berlin: Mouton.
150. Rohdenburg, G. (1996) 'Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English', Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2): 149-82.
151. Romaine, S. and Lange, D. (1991) 'The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: a case of grammaticalization in progress', American Speech, 66: 227-79.
152. Sapir, E. (1921) Language: an Introduction to the Study of Speech, New York: Harcourt Brace.
153. Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
154. Schlegel, A. W. von (1818) Observations sur la langue et littérature provençales, Paris: Librairie Grecque-Latine-Allemande.
155. Schmied, J. (1994) 'The Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English tracts', in M. Kytö, M. Rissanen and S. Wright (eds) Corpora Across the Centuries, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 81-9.
156. Schourup, L. C. (1985) Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation, New York: Garland.
157. Schütze, C. T. (1996) The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Grammaticality Judgements and Linguistic Methodology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
158. Schwenter, S. A. and Traugott, E. C. (1995) 'The semantic and pragmatic development of substitutive complex prepositions in English', in A. H. Jucker (ed.) Historical Pragmatics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 243-73.
159. Seppänen, A., Bowen, R. and Trotta, J. (1994) 'On the so-called complex prepositions', Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 29: 3-29.
160. Siegel, M. E. A. (2002) 'Like: the discourse particle and semantics', Journal of Semantics, 19: 35-71.
161. Sinclair, J. McH. (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
162. Sinclair, J. McH. (1996) EAGLES. Preliminary Recommendations on Corpus Typology. Online, available at: http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES96/corpustyp/corpustyp.html (accessed 2 August 2004).
163. Sobkowiak, W. (1997) 'On the logic of markedness arguments', paper presented at the 30th Poznan Linguistic Meeting, May 1997. Online, available at: http://elex.amu.edu.pl/~sobkow/marked.htm (accessed 2 August 2004).
164. Stenström, A.-B. (1990) 'Lexical items peculiar to spoken discourse', in J. Svartvik (ed.) The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English. Description and Research, Lund: Lund University Press, pp. 137-75.
165. Sweet, H. (1892) A New English Grammar - Logical and Historical, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
166. Sweetser, E. E. (1988) 'Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching', Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14: 389-405.
167. Taylor, J. R. (1989) Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory, Oxford: Clarendon.
168. Tottie, G. (1986) 'The importance of being adverbial. Adverbials of focusing and contingency in spoken and written English', in G. Tottie and I. Bäcklund (eds) English in Speech and Writing. A Symposium, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Anglistica Upsaliensis 60, Uppsala: Almquist and Wiksell, pp. 93-118.
169. Traugott, E. C. (1995a) 'Subjectification in grammaticalisation', in D. Stein and S. Wright (eds) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31-54.
170. Traugott, E. C. (1995b) 'The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization', paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, August 1995. Online, available at: http://www.stanford.edu/~traugott/ect-papersonline.html (accessed 2 August 2004).
171. Traugott, E. C. (2003) 'Constructions in grammaticalization', in B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds) Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 624-47.
172. Visser, F. Th. (1963-73) An Historical Syntax of the English Language, 3 parts, 4 vols, Leiden: E. J. Brill.
173. Walker, A. G. (1985) 'The two faces of silence: the effect of witness hesitancy on lawyers' impressions', in D. Tannen and M. Saville-Troike (eds) Perspectives on Silence, Norwood, NJ: Alex Publishing Society, pp. 53-75.
174. Wall, L., Christiansen, T. and Orwant, J. (2000) Programming Perl (3rd edn), Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
175. Willinsky, J. (1994) Empire of Words. The Reign of the OED, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
176. Wilson, K. G. (1993) The Columbia Guide to Standard American English, New York: Columbia University Press.
177. Wray, A. (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
178. Yorio, C. A. (1980) 'Conventionalized language forms and the development of communicative competence', TESOL Quarterly, 14(4): 433-42.