Test-retest reliability of a continuous glucose monitoring system in individuals with type 2 diabetes

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 491-498

  Terada, Tasuku ^a,c   Loehr, Sarah ^a,c   Guigard, Emmanuel ^a,c   McCargar, Linda J ^a,c   Bell, Gordon J ^a,c   Senior, Peter ^b,c   Boulé, Normand G ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CALORIMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEM; CONTINUOUS OVERLAPPING NET GLYCEMIC ACTION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; MALE; MEAN AMPLITUDE OF GLYCEMIC EXCURSION; NOCTURNAL GLYCEMIA; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN BRUISING; SKIN IRRITATION; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; TEST MEAL; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; BLOOD; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ENERGY METABOLISM; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; GLYCEMIC INDEX; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEAL; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PROCEDURES; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; HEMOGLOBIN A1C PROTEIN, HUMAN;

BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; BLOOD GLUCOSE; CALORIMETRY; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ENERGY METABOLISM; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; GLYCEMIC INDEX; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; MALE; MEALS; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84905277413     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: 15578593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2013.0355     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986
2. Shichiri M, Kishikawa H, Ohkubo Y, Wake N: Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2000;23:B21-B29
3. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;352:837-853
4. Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, Miyata T, Isami S, Motoyoshi S, Kojima Y, Furuyoshi N, Shichiri M: Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes-mellitus-A randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995;28: 103-117
5. Brownlee M, Hirsch IB: Glycemic variability: a hemoglobin A1c-independent risk factor for diabetic complications. JAMA 2006;295:1707-1708
6. Monnier L, Colette C, Boegner C, Pham TC, Lapinski H, Boniface H: Continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes: Why? When? Whom? Diabetes Metab 2007;33:247-252
7. Klonoff DC: Continuous glucose monitoring-roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care 2005;28: 1231-1239
8. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DIirecNet) Study Group: The accuracy of the CGMS in children with type 1 diabetes: results of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) accuracy study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:781-789
9. Bay C, Kristensen PL, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Tarnow L, Thorsteinsson B: Nocturnal continuous glucose monitoring: accuracy and reliability of hypoglycemia detection in patients with type 1 diabetes at high risk of severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013;15:371-377
10. Clarke WL, Anderson S, Farhy L, Breton M, Gonder-Frederick L, Cox D, Kovatchev B: Evaluating the clinical accuracy of two continuous glucose sensors using continuous glucose-error grid analysis. Diabetes Care 2005;28: 2412-2417
11. Lerman J, Bruce RA, Sivarajan E, Pettet GEM, Trimble S: Low-level dynamic exercises for earlier cardiac rehabilitation-Aerobic and hemodynamic responses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1976;57:355-360
12. Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ: A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 1986;60:2020-2027
13. Brunner GA, Ellmerer M, Sendlhofer G, Wutte A, Trajanoski Z, Schaupp L, Quehenberger F, Wach P, Krejs GJ, Pieber TR: Validation of home blood glucose meters with respect to clinical and analytical approaches. Diabetes Care 1998;21:585-590
14. Rodbard D: New and improved methods to characterize glycemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11:551-565
15. Service FJ, Molnar GD, Rosevear JW, Ackerman E, Gatewood LC, Tayloe WF: Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability. Diabetes 1970; 19:644-655
16. McDonnell CM, Donath SM, Vidmar SI, Werther GA, Cameron FJ: A novel approach to continuous glucose analysis utilizing glycemic variation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7:253-263
17. Baghurst PA: Calculating the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion from continuous glucose monitoring data: an automated algorithm. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:296-302
18. Zaccardi F, Stefano PD, Busetto E, Federici MO, Manto A, Infusino F, Lanza GA, Pitocco D, Ghirlanda G: Group of signs: a new method to evaluate glycemic variability. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2008;2:1061-1065
19. Standl E, Schnell O, Ceriello A: Postprandial hyperglycemia and glycemic variability: should we care? Diabetes Care 2011;34(Suppl 2):S120-S127
20. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations-uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428
21. Weir JP: Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005;19:231-240
22. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310
23. Mooy JM, Grootenhuis PA, deVries H, Kostense PJ, Popp-Snijders C, Bouter LM, Heine RJ: Intra-individual variation of glucose, specific insulin and proinsulin concentrations measured by two oral glucose tolerance tests in a general Caucasian population: The Hoorn Study. Diabetologia 1996; 39:298-305
24. Molnar GD, Taylor WF, Langworthy A: Measuring adequacy of diabetes regulations-comparison of continuously monitored blood-glucose patterns with values at selected time points. Diabetologia 1974;10:139-143
25. Atkinson G, Nevill AM: Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998;26:217-238
26. Kohnert K, Heinke P, Fritzsche G, Vogt L, Augstein P, Salzsieder E: Evaluation of the mean absolute glucose change as a measure of glycemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring data. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013; 15:448-454
27. Penckofer S, Quinn L, Byrn M, Ferrans C, Miller M, Strange P: Does glycemic variability impact mood and quality of life? Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:303-310
28. Rodbard D: Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11(Suppl 1):S-55-S-67
29. Fritzsche G, Kohnert K, Heinke P, Vogt L, Salzsieder E: The use of a computer program to calculate the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:319-325
30. Cameron FJ, Baghurst PA, Rodbard D: Assessing glycemic variation: why, when and how? Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2010;7(Suppl 3):432-444
31. Siegelaar SE, Holleman F, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH: Glucose variability; does it matter? Endocr Rev 2010;31: 171-182
32. Snell-Bergeon JK, Roman R, Rodbard D, Garg S, Maahs DM, Schauer IE, Bergman BC, Kinney GL, Rewers M: Glycaemic variability is associated with coronary artery calcium in men with Type 1 diabetes: the Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes study. Diabet Med 2010; 27:1436-1442
33. Iscoe KE, Davey RJ, Fournier PA: Is the response of continuous glucose monitors to physiological changes in blood glucose levels affected by sensor life? Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:135-142.