Development and psychometric properties of the Maastricht Personal Autonomy Questionnaire (MPAQ) in older adults with a chronic physical illness

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1777-1787

  Mars, Godelief M J ^a   Van Eijk, Jacques Th M ^a   Post, Marcel W M ^b   Proot, Ireen M ^c   Mesters, Ilse ^a   Kempen, Gertrudis I J M ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aged; Chronic disease; COPD; Diabetes mellitus; Personal autonomy; Psychometrics

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; COMORBIDITY; DIABETES MELLITUS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EQUIPMENT; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL CLASS; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; COMORBIDITY; DIABETES MELLITUS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOMETRICS; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL CLASS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84905273449     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0619-y     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Michie, S., Miles, J., & Weinman, J. (2003). Patient-centredness in chronic illness: What is it and does it matter? Patient Education and Counseling, 51, 197-206.
2. Cardol, M., De Haan, R. J., de Jong, B. A., Van den Bos, G. A. M., & De Groot, I. J. M. (2001). Psychometric properties of the 'impact on participation and autonomy' (IPA) questionnaire. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(2), 210-216.
3. Clark, D. A., Steer, R. A., Beck, A. T., & Ross, L. (1995). Psychometric characteristics of revised sociotropy and autonomy Scales in college students. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 325-334.
4. Bekker, M. H. (1993). The development of an autonomy scale based on recent insights into gender identity. European Journal of Personality, 7, 177-194.
5. Anderson, R. A., Worthington, L., Anderson, W. T., & Jennings, G. (1994). The development of an autonomy scale. Contemporary Family Therapy, 16, 329-345.
6. Mars, G. M. J., Kempen, G. I. J. M., Widdershoven, G. A. M., Janssen, P. P. M., & Van Eijk, J. T. M. (2008). Conceptualizing autonomy in the context of chronic physical illness: Relating philosophical theories to social scientific perspectives. Health, 12, 333-348.
7. Mars, G. M. J., Proot, I. M., Janssen, P. P. M., Van Eijk, J. T. M., & Kempen, G. I. J. M. (2007). How do people with COPD or diabetes type 2 experience autonomy? An exploratory study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 485-493.
8. Williams, G. H., & Wood, P. H. N. (1988). Coming to terms with chronic illness: The negotiation of autonomy in rheumatoid arthritis. International Disability Studies, 10(3), 128-133.
9. Townsend, A., Wyke, S., & Hunt, K. (2006). Self-managing and managing self: Practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illness, 2, 185-194.
10. Hunt, M. R., & Ells, C. (2011). Partners towards autonomy: Risky choices and relational autonomy in rehabilitation care. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 961-967.
11. Van Eijk, J. T. M., & De Haan, M. (1998). Care for the chronically ill: The future role of health care professionals and their patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 35, 233-240.
12. Mars, G. M. J., Kempen, G. I. J. M., Post, M. W. M., Proot, I. M., Mesters, I., & Van Eijk, J. T. M. (2009). The Maastricht social participation profile: Development and clinimetric properties in older adults with a chronic physical illness. Quality of Life Research, 18, 1207-1218.
13. Lessler, J. T., & Forsyth, B. H. (1996). A coding system for appraising questionnaires. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 259-291). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
14. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences no. 07-017). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Esposito, J. L., & Rothgeb, J. M. (1997). Evaluating survey data: Making the transition from pretesting to quality assessment. In L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. de Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, & D. Trewin (Eds.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 541-571). New York: Wiley.
16. Kurz, K., Prüfer, P., & Rexroth, M. (1999). Zur Validität von Fragen in standardisierten Erhebungen. Ergebnisse des Einsatzes eines kognitiven Pretestinterviews (On the validity of questions in standardised surveys. Results of a cognitive pretest interview). ZUMA-Nachrichten, 44(23), 83-107.
17. SPSS for Windows, Rel. 12.0.1. (2003). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
18. Lamers, F., Jonkers, C. C., Bosma, H., Diederiks, J. P., & Van Eijk, J. T. M. (2006). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychological intervention to reduce non-severe depression in chronically ill elderly patients: The design of a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN92331982]. BMC Public Health, 6, 161.
19. Ware, J. E, Jr, & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473-483.
20. Van der Zee, K. I., & Sanderman, R. (1993). Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36: Een handleiding [Measuring general health with the RAND-36: A manual]. Groningen: Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken.
21. Cardol, M., Beelen, A., Van den Bos, G. A., De Jong, B. A., De Groot, I. J., & De Haan, R. J. (2002). Responsiveness of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1524-1529.
22. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
23. Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.
24. Bosscher, R. J., & Smit, J. H. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the general self-efficacy scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 339-343.
25. Bosscher, R. J., Smit, J. H., & Kempen, G. I. J. M. (1997). Algemene competentieverwachtingen bij ouderen: Een onderzoek naar de psychometrische kenmerken van de Algemene Competentieschaal (ALCOS) (General self-efficacy expectancies in the elderly: A study about the psychometric properties of the General Self-Efficacy Scale [GSES]). Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 52, 239-248.
26. Schreurs, P. J. G., Van de Willige, G., Brosschot, J. F., Tellegen, B., & Graus, G. M. H. (1993). De Utrechtse Coping Lijst: UCL; herziene handleiding [The Utrecht Coping List: UCL-Manual]. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
27. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. LISREL 8.3. (1999). Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
29. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Faulbaum, F. (1981). Konfirmatorische Analysen der Reliabilität von Wichtigkeitseinstufungen beruflicher Merkmale. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 9, 22-44.
31. Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172-175.
32. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., De Boer, M. R., Van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 34-42.
33. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
34. Nichols, D. P. (1998). Choosing an intraclass correlation coefficient. SPSS Keywords, 67.
35. De Vet, H. C., Bouter, L. M., Bezemer, P. D., & Beurskens, A. J. (2001). Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures: Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 17, 479-487.
36. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 135-160.
37. Drummond, N., & Mason, C. (1990). Diabetes in a social context: Just a different way of life in the Age of Reason. In S. Cunningham-Burley & N. McKeganey (Eds.), Readings in medical sociology (pp. 37-54). London: Routledge.
38. Adams, S., Pill, R., & Jones, A. (1997). Medication, chronic illness and identity: The perspective of people with asthma. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 189-201.
39. McCoach, D., & Anderson, J. (2010). Dealing with dependence (part I): Understanding the effects of clustered data. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 152-155.