Small sum privacy and large sum utility in data publishing

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 50, Issue , 2014, Pages 20-31

  Fu, Ada Wai Chee ^a   Wang, Ke ^b   Wong, Raymond Chi Wing ^c   Wang, Jia ^d   Jiang, Minhao ^c  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^d University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Inference attacks; Privacy preserving data publishing; Privacy versus utility

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

AGGREGATE QUERIES; DATA PUBLISHING; DATA UTILITIES; INFERENCE ATTACKS; PRIVACY PRESERVING DATA PUBLISHING; SANITIZATION; SENSITIVE INFORMATIONS;

BIOINFORMATICS;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; DATA BASE; HUMAN; LARGE SUM UTILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; PROBABILITY; PUBLISHING; SMALL SUM PRIVACY; INTERNET; THEORETICAL MODEL;

INTERNET; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PRIVACY; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84905273311     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adam N.R., Wortmann J.C. Security-control methods for statistical databases: a comparative study. ACM Comput Surv 1989, 21(4):515-556.
2. Agrawal D, Aggarwal CC. On the design and quantification of privacy preserving data mining algorithms. In: ACM PODS; 2001. p. 247-55.
3. Agrawal R., Srikant R. Privacy-preserving data mining. SIGMOD 2000, 439-450. ACM Press.
4. Agrawal R, Srikant R, Thomas D. Privacy preserving olap. In: SIGMOD; 2005. p. 251-62.
5. Chaytor R, Wang K. Small domain randomization: same privacy, more utility. In: VLDB; 2010. p. 608-18.
6. Clifton C., Tassa T. On syntactic anonymity and differential privacy. Trans Data Privacy 2013, 6(2):161-183.
7. Cormode G. Personal privacy vs population privacy: learning to attack anonymization. In: KDD; 2011. p. 1253-61.
8. Cormode G, Procopiuc CM, Shen E, Srivastava D, Yu T. Empirical privacy and empirical utility of anonymized data. In: ICDE workshop on privacy-preserving data publication and analysis (PRIVDB); 2013. p. 77-82.
9. Ding B, Winslett M, Han J, Li Z. Differentially private data cubes: optimizing noise sources and consistency. In: SIGMOD; 2011. p. 217-28.
10. Dinur I, Nissim K. Revealing information while preserving privacy. In: PODS; 2003. p. 202-10.
11. Duncan GT, Keller-McNulty SA, Stokes SL. Disclosure risk vs data utility: the R-U confidentiality map. In: Technical report number 121, National Institute of Statistical Sciences; December 2001.
12. Dwork C. Differential privacy. In: International colloquium on automata, languages and programming (ICALP); 2006. p. 1-12.
13. Dwork C. A firm foundation for private data analysis. Commun ACM 2011, 54(1):86-95.
14. Dwork C, McSherry F, Nissim K, Smith A. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In: Proc 3rd theory of cryptography conference; 2006. p. 265-84.
15. Feliegi I. On the question of statistical confidentiality. J Am Stat Assoc 1972, 67(337):7-18.
16. Hoffman L., Miller W.F. Getting a personal dossier from a statistical data bank. Datamation 1970, 16(5):74-75.
17. Hurkens C.J., Tiourine S. Models and methods for the microdata protection problem. J Off Stat 1998, 437-447.
18. Kifer D. Attacks on privacy and definetti's theorem. In: SIGMOD; 2009. p. 127-38.
19. Loukides G, Shao J. Data utility and privacy protection trade-off in k-anonymisation. In: PAIS '08 proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on privacy and anonymity in information society; 2008. p. 36-45.
20. Machanavajjhala A, Gehrke J, Kifer D. l-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity. In: ICDE; 2006. p. 24.
21. Rastogi V, Suciu D, Hong S. The boundary between privacy and utility in data publishing. In: VLDB; 2007. p. 531-42.
22. Samarati P. Protecting respondents' identities in microdata release. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 2001, 13(6).
23. Soria-Comas J, Domingo-Ferrer J. Differential privacy via t-closeness in data publishing. In: 11th IEEE annual conference on privacy, security and trust-PST; 2013. p. 27-35.
24. Soria-Comas J, Domingo-Ferrer J, Sánchez D, Martínez S. Improving the utility of differentially private data releases via k-anonymity. In: 12th IEEE international conference on trust, security and privacy in computing and communications; 2013. p. 371-9.
25. Sweeney L. Weaving technology and policy together to maintain confidentiality. J Law Med Ethics 1997, 25(2-3):98-110.
26. Sweeney L. k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. Int J Uncertain Fuzz Knowl Syst 2002, 10(5):557-570.
27. Traub J., Yemini Y., Wozniakowski H. The statistical security of a statistical database. ACM Trans Database Syst 1984, 9(4).
28. Wong R., Fu A., Wang K., Xu Y., Yu P., Pei J. Can the utility of anonymized data be used for privacy breaches. ACM Trans Knowl Discovery Data 2011, 5(3):1-23. 39.
29. Xiao X, Bender G, Hay M, Gehrke J. ireduct: differential privacy with reduced relative errors. In: SIGMOD; 2011. p. 229-40.
30. Xiao X, Tao Y. Anatomy: simple and effective privacy preservation. In: VLDB; 2006. p. 139-50.