Welcoming systematic reviews to the Journal of the Medical Library Association

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 143-145

  Sampson, Margaret ^a  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LITERATURE; MASS COMMUNICATION; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PUBLICATION; STANDARDS;

BIBLIOGRAPHY AS TOPIC; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84905265951     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Internet]. 5. 1. 0 ed. Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 [cited 18 Feb 2014]., http://www. handbook. cochrane. org.
2. Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Med [Internet]. 2005; 2(8): e124 [cited 21 Jan 2014]., http://dx. plos. org/10. 1371/journal. pmed. 0020124.
3. Wikipedia. Cold fusion [Internet]. Wikimedia Foundation; 2014 [cited 20 Feb 2014]., http://www. en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Cold_fusion?.
4. National Library of Medicine. Medical Subject Headings: Bias (Epidemiology) [Internet]. The Library; 2014 [cited 15 Apr 2014]. http://www. nlm. nih. gov/cgi/mesh/2014/MB_cgi.
5. Medical Library Association. Journal of the Medical Library Association: information for authors [Internet]. The Association; 2014 [cited 20 Feb 2014]., http://www. mlanet. org/publications/jmla/jmlainfo. html.
6. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med [Internet]. 2009; 6(7): e1000097 [cited 21 Jan 2014]., http://www. plosmedicine. org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10. 1371% 2Fjournal. pmed. 1000097.
7. Stroup DF. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000 Apr 19; 283(15): 2008-12.
8. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar; 340: c332.
9. Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, Hill C, Gaboury I. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? a systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006 Sep 4; 185(5): 263-7.
10. Wen J, Ren Y, Wang L, Li Y, Liu Y, Zhou M, Liu P, Ye L, Li Y, Tian W. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug; 61(8): 770-5.
11. Cooper ID, Crum JA. New activities and changing roles of health sciences librarians: a systematic review, 1990-2012. J Med Lib Assoc. 2013 Oct; 101(4): 268-77. DOI: http://dx. doi. org/10. 3163/1536-5050. 101. 4. 008.
12. Rankin JA, Grefsheim SF, Canto CC. The emerging informationist specialty: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Lib Assoc. 2008 Jul; 96(3): 194-206. DOI: http://dx. doi. org/10. 3163/1536-5050. 96. 3. 005.
13. Golder S, Loke Y. Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review. J Med Lib Assoc. 2009 Apr; 97(2): 84-92. DOI: http://dx. doi. org/10. 3163/1536-5050. 97. 2. 004.
14. Wagner KC, Byrd GD. Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical medical librarian programs: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Lib Assoc. 2004 Jan; 92(1): 14-33.
15. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. J Med Lib Assoc. 2005 Jan; 93(1): 74-80.