National trends in the utilization of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: An analysis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 785-790

  Monn, M Francesca ^a   Cary, K Clint ^a   Kaimakliotis, Hristos Z ^a   Flack, Chandra K ^a   Koch, Michael O ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Radical cystectomy; Robotic assistance; Urothelial bladder cancer

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEART DISEASE; HEMATOMA; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SEROMA; SURGICAL PATIENT; UNITED STATES; URINARY TRACT DISEASE; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; WOUND COMPLICATION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC HEALTH; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; UTILIZATION;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PUBLIC HEALTH; ROBOTICS; UNITED STATES; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84905254911     PISSN: 10781439     EISSN: 18732496     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bladder Cancer: SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2010 2013, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. N.N.A. Howlader, M. Krapcho, J. Garshell, N. Neyman, S.F. Altekruse, C.L. Kosary (Eds.).
2. Parra R.O., Andrus C.H., Jones J.P., et al. Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol 1992, 148:1140-1144.
3. Sanchez de Badajoz E., Gallego Perales J.L., Reche Rosado A., et al. Laparoscopic cystectomy and ileal conduit: case report. J Endourol 1995, 9:59-62.
4. Menon M., Hemal A.K., Tewari A., et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in female patients: technique with preservation of the uterus and vagina. J Am Coll Surg 2004, 198:386-393.
5. Thurairaja R., Studer U.E., Burkhard F.C. Indications, extent, and benefits of pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with bladder and prostate cancer. Oncologist 2009, 14:40-51.
6. Marshall S.J., Hayn M.H., Stegemann A.P., et al. Impact of surgeon and volume on extended lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC). BJU Int 2013, 111:1075-1080.
7. Nix J., Smith A., Kurpad R., et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 2010, 57:196-201.
8. Parekh D.J., Messer J., Fitzgerald J., et al. Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol 2013, 189:474-479.
9. Collins J.W., Tyritzis S., Nyberg T., et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2013, 64:654-663.
10. Snow-Lisy D.C., Campbell S.C., Gill I.S., et al. Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2014, 65:193-200.
11. HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, 2009-2011 [accessed 01.2014]. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp.
12. HCUP Cost-to-Charge Ratio Files (CCR). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, 2009-2011 [accessed 01.2014]. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/costtocharge.jsp.
13. Deyo R.A., Cherkin D.C., Ciol M.A. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:613-619.
14. Collins J.W., Tyritzis S., Nyberg T., et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal neobladder-what is the effect of the learning curve on outcomes?. BJU Int 2014, 113:100-107.
15. Kim S.P., Boorjian S.A., Shah N.D., et al. Contemporary trends of in-hospital complications and mortality for radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2012, 110:1163-1168.
16. Monn M.F., Bahler C.D., Schneider E.B., et al. Emerging trends in robotic pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. J Urol 2013, 189:1352-1357.
17. Yu H.Y., Hevelone N.D., Lipsitz S.R., et al. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 2012, 187:1392-1398.
18. Makarov D.V., Yu J.B., Desai R.A., et al. The association between diffusion of the surgical robot and radical prostatectomy rates. Med Care 2011, 49:333-339.
19. Upchurch G.R., Dimick J.B., Wainess R.M., et al. Diffusion of new technology in health care: the case of aorto-iliac occlusive disease. Surgery 2004, 136:812-818.
20. Wang Y.R., Dempsey D.T., Friedenberg F.K., et al. Trends of Heller myotomy hospitalizations for achalasia in the United States, 1993-2005: effect of surgery volume on perioperative outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:2454-2464.
21. Khan M.S., Challacombe B., Elhage O., et al. A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Pract 2012, 66:656-662.
22. Smith A.B., Raynor M.C., Pruthi R.S. Peri- and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). BJU Int 2011, 108:969-975.
23. Li K., Lin T., Fan X., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting early outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy. Cancer Treat Rev 2013, 39:551-560.
24. Martin A.D., Nunez R.N., Castle E.P. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a complete cost analysis. Urology 2011, 77:621-625.
25. Lee R., Chughtai B., Herman M., et al. Cost-analysis comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RC) vs open RC. BJU Int 2011, 108:976-983.
26. Lee R., Ng C.K., Shariat S.F., et al. The economics of robotic cystectomy: cost comparison of open versus robotic cystectomy. BJU Int 2011, 108:1886-1892.
27. Ma L.L., Bi H., Hou X.F., et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: initial experience in China using a homemade single-port device. J Endourol 2012, 26:355-359.
28. Mmeje C.O., Martin A.D., Nunez-Nateras R., et al. Cost analysis of open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Curr Urol Rep 2013, 14:26-31.
29. Smith A., Kurpad R., Lal A., et al. Cost analysis of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol 2010, 183:505-509.
30. Zehnder P., Gill I.S. Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy and urinary diversion. Curr Opin Urol 2011, 21:415-419.