Comment on 'Confined placental mosaicism: Implications for fetal chromosomal analysis using microarray comparative genomic hybridization'

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 815-816

  Kooper, Angelique J A ^a   Faas, Brigitte H W ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHORION VILLUS; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONFINED PLACENTAL MOSAICISM; CYTOTROPHOBLAST; DNA EXTRACTION; EXON; FETUS; FOLLOW UP; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; LETTER; MOSAICISM; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; CHEMISTRY; FEMALE; MALE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PLACENTA; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES;

COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOSAICISM; PLACENTA; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84905243480     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4356     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Karampetsou E, Morrogh D, Ballard T, et al. Confined placental mosaicism: implications for fetal chromosomal analysis using microarray comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagn 2014;34(1):98-101.
2. Mann K, Kabba M, Donaghue C, et al. Analysis of a chromosomally mosaic placenta to assess the cell populations in dissociated chorionic villi: implications for QF-PCR aneuploidy testing. Prenat Diagn 2007;27:285-9.
3. Hastings R, Howell R, Bricarelli FD, et al. Specific constitutional cytogenetic guidelines. 2012. A common European framework for quality assessment for constitutional, acquired and molecular cytogenetic investigations. E.C.A. Permanent Working Group for Cytogenetics and Society. Available at: http://www.e-c-a.eu [accessed February 8, 2014].
4. Kooper AJ, Faas BH, Feuth T, et al. Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. J Mol Diagn 2009;11(1):17-24.
5. Faas BH, Feenstra I, Eggink AJ, et al. Non-targeted whole genome 250K SNP array analysis as replacement for karyotyping in fetuses with structural ultrasound anomalies: evaluation of a one-year experience. Prenat Diagn 2012;32(4):362-70.