Trading zone and the complexity of planning

Urban Planning as a Trading Zone

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 159-177

  Kanninen, Vesa ^a   Bäcklund, Pia ^b   Mäntysalo, Raine ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Agonism; Bounded rationality; Consensus; Local boundedness; Normative

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905240430     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5854-4_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Agger A, Löfgren K (2008) Democratic assessment of collaborative planning processes. Plann Theor 7:145-164
2. Alexander ER (2008) The role of knowledge in planning. Plann Theor 7(2):207-210
3. Bäcklund P (2005) Paikallisyhteisö liikkeellä! In: Bäcklund P, Schulman H (eds) Suunnittelun kumppanuudet - tapaus Vuosaari. Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskuksen erityisjulkaisuja, Helsinki, pp 67-85
4. Bäcklund P (2007) Tietämisen politiikka. Kokemuksellinen tieto kunnan hallinnassa (Politics of Knowing. Experiential knowledge in City Governance. City of Helsinki Urban Facts special publications). PhD dissertation, in Finnish]
5. Bäcklund P, Mäntysalo R (2010) Agonism and institutional ambiguity: ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice - the case of Finland. Plann Theor 9(4):333-350
6. Barnes M, Newman J, Knops A, Sullivan H (2003) Constituting “the public” in public participation. Public Adm 81(2):379-399 s
7. Barry J, Porter L (2011) Indigenous recognition in state-based planning systems: Understanding textual mediation in the contact zone. Plann Theor, OnlineFirst. 21 Nov 2011
8. Christensen KS (1985) Coping with uncertainty in planning. J Am Plann Assoc 51(1):63-73
9. Collins H, Evans R, Gorman M (2007) Trading zones and interactional expertise. Stud Hist Philos Sci 38:657-666
10. Flyvbjerg B (1998) Rationality and power. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
11. Forester J (1989) Planning in the face of power. University of California Press, Berkeley
12. Forester J (1993) Critical theory, public policy, and planning practice. State University of New York Press, Albany
13. Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain. From knowledge to action. Princeton University Press, Princeton
14. Friedmann J (2008) The uses of planning theory: a bibliographic essay. J Plann Educ Res 28:247-257
15. Fuller B (2006) Trading zones: cooperating for water resource and ecosystem management when stakeholders have apparently irreconcilable differences. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
16. Fuller B (2008) Cooperating and still disagreeing on what really matters. LKY School of Public Policy, Working paper
17. Fuller B (2010) Surprising cooperation despite apparently irreconcilable differences: Agricultural water use efficiency and CALFED. Environ Sci Policy 12:663-673
18. Galison P (1997) Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
19. Galison P (2010) Trading with the enemy. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. MIT Press, Cambridge
20. Gorman M, Werhane P, Swami N (2009) Moral imagination, trading zones, and the role of the ethicist in nanotechnology. Nanoethics 3:185-195
21. Gustafsson C (2009) The Halland model. A trading zone for building conservation in concert with labour market policy and the construction industry, aiming at regional sustainable development. Chalmers university of technology, Goteborg
22. Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action, vol 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon, Boston
23. Habermas J (1987) The theory of communicative action, vol 2. Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Polity Press, Cambridge
24. Hajer M (2004) Three dimensions of deliberative policy analysis. The case of rebuilding ground zero. Paper for presentation at the 2004 convention of the American Political Science Association, Chicago
25. Healey P (1992) Planning through debate. Town Plann Rev 63(2):143-162
26. Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan, London
27. Hiironniemi S (2005) Suomen hallinto verkostona - 2000-luvun haasteiden hallintaa. Sisäasiainministeriön julkaisuja 14/2005. 133 s. Helsinki
28. Hillier J (2000) Going round the back? Environ Plann A 32:33-54
29. Hillier J (2002) Shadows of power. Routledge, London
30. Hillier J (2003) Agonizing over consensus: why habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’. Plann Theor 2(1):37-59
31. Hull A (2008) Policy integration: what will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transp Policy 15:94-103
32. Innes JE (1995) Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice. J Plann Educ Res 14(3):183-190
33. Innes JE, Booher DE (1999) Consensus building as role playing and Bricolage: toward a theory of collaborative planning. J Am Plann Assoc 65(1):9-26
34. Innes JE, Booher DE, Di Vittorio S (2011) Strategies for megaregion governance. J Am Plann Assoc 77(1):55-67
35. Jalonen H (2007) Kompleksisuusteoreettinen tulkinta hallinnollisen tehokkuuden ja luovuuden yhteensovittamisesta kunnallisen paatoksenteon valmistelutyossa. Tampereen teknillinen yliopisto. Tampere (PhD dissertation)
36. Janssen I (2009) Power positions in out-of-town retail development decisions. Paper presented at 16th ERES conference, 24-27 June, Stockholm
37. Jenkins L (2010) The evolution of a trading zone: a case study of the turtle excluder device. Stud Hist Philos Sci 41:75-85
38. Kanninen V (2010) Kauppakeskusten kestavan suunnittelun kysymyksia Iso-Britanniassa ja Alankomaissa. In: Kanninen V, Rantanen A (eds) Kauppakeskukset osana kestavaa kulutusta ja kaupunkirakennetta. 50-53. Yhdyskuntasuunnittelun tutkimus- ja koulutuskeskuksen julkaisu C 82, Espoo, pp 50-53
39. Kanninen V, Kontio P, Mantysalo R, Ristimaki M (eds) (2010) Autoriippuvainen yhdyskunta ja sen vaihtoehdot. Yhdyskuntasuunnittelun tutkimus- ja koulutuskeskuksen julkaisu B 101, Espoo
40. Kellogg K, Orlikowski J, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ Sci 17(1):22-44
41. Luhtakallio E (2010) Local politicizations. A comparison of Finns and French practicing democracy. Helsinki University Press, Helsinki
42. Mäntysalo R (2000) Land-use planning as inter-organizational learning. 385 s. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis Technica, C 155, Oulu
43. Mäntysalo R (2002) Dilemmas in critical planning theory. Town Plann Rev 73(4):417-436
44. Mäntysalo R, Balducci A, Kangasoja J (2011a) Planning as agonistic communication in a trading zone: re-examining Lindblom’s partisan mutual adjustment. Plann Theor 10:257-272
45. Mäntysalo R, Saglie I-L, Cars G (2011b) Between input legitimacy and output efficiency: defensive routines and agonistic reflectivity in Nordic land-use planning. Eur Plann Stud 19(12):2109-2126
46. Mazza L (2002) Technical knowledge and planning actions. Plann Theor 1(1):11-26
47. Messeri LR (2010) The problem with pluto: conflicting cosmologies and the classification of planets. Soc Stud Sci 40:187-214
48. Mills D, Huber MT (2005) Anthropology and the educational ‘trading zone’: disciplinarity, pedagogy and professionalism. Arts Humanit High Educ 4:9-32
49. Mouffe C (2000) The democratic paradox. Verso, London
50. Peters G, Pierre J (2004) Multi-level governance and democracy: a Faustian Bargain? In: Bache I, Flanders M (eds) Multi-level governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 75-92
51. Pløger J (2006) Urban planning and urban life: problems and challenges. Plann Pract Res 21(2):201-222
52. Pratt ML (1991) Arts of the contact zone. Profession 91:33-40
53. Rosanvallon P (2008) Vastademokratia. Politiikka epäluulon aikakaudella. Vastapaino, Tampere (Suomentanut Tapani Kilpeläinen)
54. Sager T (1994) Communicative planning theory. Avebury, Aldershot
55. Silver H, Scott A, Kazepov Y (2010) Participation in Urban Contention and Deliberation. Int J Urban Reg Res 34(3):453-477
56. Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Soc Stud Sci 19:387-420
57. Tewdwr-Jones M, Allmendinger P (1998) Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environ Plann A 30:1975-1989
58. van Eeden M (2010) The regional retail derby. A comparative research about the competiveness of three Dutch inner-city centres versus large-scale peripheral shopping centres. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Department Real Estate and Housing, Working paper
59. Vartola J (2004) Nakokulmia Byrokratiaan. Tampereen Yliopistopaino oy, Tampere
60. Wilson G, Herndl CG (2007) Boundary objects as rhetorical exigency: knowledge mapping and interdisciplinary cooperation at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. J Bus Tech Commun 21(2):129-154