A return to the 'Pompeii premise'

Time and Archaeology

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 8-27

  Murray, Tim ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905204398     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203203019     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Ascher, R. 1962. Ethnography for archaeology: a case from the Seri Indians. Ethnology 1, 360-9.
2. Bailey, G.N. 1983. Concepts of time in quaternary prehistory. Annual Review of Anthropology 12, 165-92.
3. Bailey, G.N. 1987. Breaking the time barrier. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 6, 5-20.
4. Barrett, J. 1994. Fragments from Antiquity. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Berlin, Sir I. 1980. The concept of scientific history. In Concepts and Categories, 103-42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Binford, L.R. 1981. Behavioural archaeology and the 'Pompeii premise'. Journal of Anthropological Research 37, 195-208.
7. Binford, L.R. 1983. Working at Archaeology. New York: Academic Press.
8. Binford, L.R. and J.A.Sabloff 1982. Paradigms, systematics, and archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research 38, 137-53.
9. Braudel, F. 1972. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. London: Collins.
10. Braudel, F. 1981. On History. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
11. Bunn, H.T. and E.M.Kroll 1993. Comment on The Structure of the Lower Pleistocene Archaeological Record', by N.Stern. Current Anthropology 34, 201.
12. Dunnell, R.C. 1982. Science, social science and common sense: the agonizing dilemma of modern archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research 38, 1-25.
13. Fletcher, R. 1992. Time perspectivism, Annales and archaeology. In Archaeology, Annales and Ethnohistory, B.Knapp (ed.), 35-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Gell, A. 1992. The Anthropology of Time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford: Berg.
15. Gould, S.J. 1980. The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline. Paleobiology 6, 96-118.
16. Gould, S.J. 1989. Wonderful Life: the Burgess shale and the nature of history. London: Hutchinson.
17. McGlade, J. 1995. Archaeology and the eco-dynamics of human-modified landscapes. Antiquity 69, 113-32.
18. Murray, T. 1987. Remembrance of things present: appeals to authority in the history, philosophy and sociology of archaeology. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Sydney.
19. Murray, T. 1993. Archaeology, ideology and the threat of the past: Sir Henry Rider Haggard and the acquisition of time. World Archaeology 25, 175-86.
20. Murray, T. 1996. From Sydney to Sarajevo: a centenary reflection on archaeology and European identity. Archaeological Dialogues 3, 56-70.
21. Murray, T. 1997. Dynamic modelling and new social theory of the mid-to-long term. In Time, Process, and Structured Transformation, S.van der Leeuw and J.McGlade (eds), 449-63. London: Routledge.
22. Murray, T. In press. Plausibility and tradition: why the history of archaeology matters. In Studying Human Origins: the uses of disciplinary history, W.Roebroeks and R.Corbey (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Murray, T. and M.Walker 1988. Like WHAT? A practical question of analogical inference and archaeological meaningfulness. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 7, 248-87.
24. Oudemans, T.C.W. 1996. Heidegger and archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues 3, 29-33.
25. Patrik, L.E. 1985. Is there an archaeological record? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8, 27-62.
26. Renfrew, C. 1982. Discussion: contrasting paradigms. In Ranking, Resource and Exchange, C. Renfrew and S.Shennan (eds), 141-3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Roth, P.A. and T.A.Ryckman 1995. Chaos, Klio, and scientistic illusions of understanding. History and Theory 34, 30-44.
28. Schiffer, M.B. 1976. Behavioral Archaeology. New York: Academic Press.
29. Schiffer, M.B. 1985. Is there a 'Pompeii Premise' in archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Research 41, 18-41.
30. Schiffer, M.B. 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
31. Sept, J. 1993. Comment on 'The Structure of the Lower Pleistocene Archaeological Record', by N.Stern. Current Anthropology 34, 218-19.
32. Shanks, M. and C.Tilley 1987. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity.
33. Shermer, M. 1995. Exorcising Lapkce's demon: chaos and antichaos, history and meta-history. History and Theory 34, 59-81.
34. Smith, M.E. 1992. Braudel's temporal rhythms and chronology theory in archaeology. In Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory, B.Knapp (ed.), 23-34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Spiess, A.E. 1979. Reindeer and Caribou Hunters: An Archaeological Study. San Francisco: Academic Press.
36. Squair, R. 1994. Time and the privilege of retrospect. In Archaeological Theory: progress or posture?, I.M.Mackenzie (ed.), 92-113. Aldershot: Avebury.
37. Stern, N. 1993. The structure of the lower pleistocene archaeological record. Current Anthropology 34, 201-25.
38. Stern, N. 1994. The implications of time-averaging for reconstructing the land-use patterns of the early tool-using hominds. Journal of Human Evolution 27, 89-105.
39. Taylor, W.W. 1948. A Study of Archaeology. Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association, No. 69, Menasha.
40. Thomas, J. 1996. Time, Culture and Identity: an interpretive archaeology. London: Routledge.
41. van der Leeuw, S. and J.McGlade (eds), 1997. Time, Process, and Structured Transformation. London: Routledge.
42. Wylie, A. 1982. Epistemological issues raised by a structuralist archaeology. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, I.Hodder (ed.), 39-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Wylie, A. 1995. Alternative histories: epistemic disunity and political integrity. In Making Alternative Histories, P.R.Schmidt and T.C.Patterson (eds), 255-72. Albuquerque: School of American Research/University of New Mexico Press.