Patterns of learning, residence and descent among potters in Ticul, Yucatan, Mexico

Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 174-184

  Arnold, Dean E ^a  

^a WHEATON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905203844     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203111147     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Allen, W.L. & J.B.Richardson III 1971. The reconstruction of kinship from archaeological data: the concepts, the methods, and the feasibility. American Antiquity 36, 41-53.
2. Arnold, D.E. 1971. Ethnomineralogy of Ticul, Yucatan potters. American Antiquity 36, 20-40.
3. Arnold, D.E. 1981. A model for the identification of non-local ceramic distribution: a view from the present. In Production and distribution: a ceramic viewpoint. H. Howard & E.L.Morris (eds), 31-44. Oxford: BAR International Series 120.
4. Arnold, D.E. 1983. Design structure and community organization in Quinua, Peru. In Structure and cognition in art, D.K.Washburn (ed.), 56-74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Arnold, D.E. 1984. Social interaction and ceramic design: community-wide correlates in Quinua, Peru. In Pots and potters: current approaches in ceramic archaeology, P. Rice (ed.), 133-61. Monograph XXIV. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California.
6. Arnold, D.E. 1985a. Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Arnold, D.E. 1985b. Maya potters after 20 years: archaeological implications. Paper presented to the Maya Ceramics Conference, Washington, DC, 4 December 1985. (Paper in press in published papers of the conference, BAR International Series.)
8. Arnold, D.E. & B.F.Bohor 1975. Attapulgite and Maya Blue: an ancient mine comes to light. Archaeology 28, 23-9.
9. Arnold, D.E. & B.F.Bohor 1977. Ancient clay mine at Yo' K'at, Yucatan. American Antiquity 42, 575-82.
10. Deetz, J. 1965. The dynamics of stylistic change in Ankara ceramics. Illinois Studies in Anthropology No. 4. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
11. Hayden, B. & A.Cannon 1982. The corporate group as an archaeological unit. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1, 132-58.
12. Hayden, B. & A.Cannon 1984. Interaction inferences in archaeology and learning frameworks of the Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 3, 325-67.
13. Hill, J.N. 1970. Broken K.Pueblo: prehistoric social organization in American Southwest. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona, No. 18. Tucson:University of Arizona Press.
14. Kramer, C. 1985. Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 14, 17-102.
15. Longacre, W.A. 1970. Archaeology as anthropology: a case study. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona No. 17. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
16. Peacock, D.S.P. 1982. Pottery in the Roman World: an ethnoarchaeological approach. London:Longman.
17. Reina, R., E.Reina & R.M.Hill 1978. The traditional pottery of Guatemala. Austin:University of Texas Press.
18. Stanislawski, M.B. 1977. Ethnoarchaeology of Hopi and Hopi-Tewa pottery making:styles of learning. In Experimental archaeology, D.Ingersoll, J.E.Yellen & W.MacDonald (eds), 378-408. New York: Columbia University Press.
19. Stanislawski, M.B. & B.B.Stanislawski 1978. Hopi and Hopi-Tewa ceramic tradition networks. In The spatial organization of culture, I.Hodder (ed.), 61-76. London:Duckworth.