Generating musical accompaniment through functional scaffolding

Proceedings of the 8th Sound and Music Computing Conference, SMC 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Hoover, Amy K ^a   Szerlip, Paul A ^a   Stanley, Kenneth O ^a  

^a University of Central Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SURVEYS;

DATA INTENSIVE; INTERACTIVE EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION; LARGE CORPORA; MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP; MUSICAL COMPOSITION; ONE PARTS; STATISTICAL RELATIONSHIP;

SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84905168417     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. P. J. Silvia, Discernment and creativity: How well can people identify their most creative ideas? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 139-146, 2008.
2. R. J. Sternberg, The nature of creativity, In The Essential Sternberg Essays on Intelligence, Psychology, and Education. Springer, LLC, 2009.
3. M. L. Maher, Evaluating creativity in humans, computers, and collectively intelligent systems, In Proc. of the 1st DESIRE Network Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, 2010, pp. 22-28.
4. P. N. Johnson-Laird, Freedom and constrain in creativity, In The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1988.
5. R. C. Shank, Creativity as a mechanical process, In The Essential Sternberg Essays on Intelligence, Psychology, and Education. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1988.
6. D. Cope, Computer Models of Creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
7. A. Dorin and K. B. Korb, Improbable Creativity, In Proc. of the Dagstuhl International Seminar on Computational Creativity, 2009.
8. W. Hodges and R. J. Wilson, Musical patterns, In Mathematic and Music: A Diderot Mathematical Forum. Springer-Verlag, 2002, ch. 5.
9. J.-C. Risset, Computing musical sound, In Mathematic and Music: A Diderot Mathematical Forum. Springer-Verlag, 2002, ch. 13.
10. L. Harkleroad, The Math Behind the Music, ser. Outlooks. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
11. S. Cannon, Maximally smooth diatonic trichord cycles, In Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Mathematics and Computation in Music, 2009.
12. D. Tymoczko, Three conceptions of musical distance, In Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Mathematics and Computation in Music, 2009.
13. C. Rhodes, D. Lewis, and D. Müllensiefen, Bayesian model selection for harmonic labelling, In Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Mathematics and Computation in Music, 2007.
14. K. M. Kitani and H. Koike, Improvgenerator: Online grammatical induction for on-the-fly improvisation accompaniment, In Proc. of the 2010 Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2010), 2010.
15. M. Dahia, H. Santana, E. Trajano, G. L. Ramalho, C. Sandroni, and G. Cabral, Using patterns to generate rhythmic accompaniment for guitar, In Proc.of the International Conference on Sound and Music Computing, 2004, pp. 111-115.
16. W. F. Walker, A computer participant in musical improvisation, In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1997, pp. 123-130.
17. A. K. Hoover, P. A. Szerlip, and K. O. Stanley, Interactively evolving harmonies through functional scaffolding, In Proc. of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2011). New York, NY: ACM, 2011, to appear.
18. D. Ponsford, G. Wiggins, and C. Mellish, Statistical learning of harmonic movement, Journal of New Music Research, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 150-177, 1999.
19. I. Simon, D. Morris, and S. Basu, MySong: automatic accompaniment generation for vocal melodies, In Proc. of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2008, pp. 725-734.
20. C.-H. Chuan and E. Chew, A hybrid system for automatic generation of style-specific accompaniment, In 4th International Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity, 2007.
21. H. Takagi, Interactive evolutionary computation: Fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation, Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 1275-296, Sep 2001.
22. J. A. Biles, Interactive genjam: Integrating real-time performance with a genetic algorithm, In Proc. of the 1998 International Computer Music Conference, 1998.
23. A. K. Hoover, M. P. Rosario, and K. O. Stanley, Scaffolding for interactively evolving novel drum tracks for existing songs, In Proc. of the Sixth European Workshop on Evolutionary and Biologically Inspired Music, Sound, Art and Design (EvoMUSART 2008), 2008.
24. A. K. Hoover and K. O. Stanley, Exploiting functional relationships in musical composition, Connection Science Special Issue on Music, Brain, & Cognition, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 227-251, June 2009.
25. K. O. Stanley, Compositional pattern producing netorks: A novel abstraction of development, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines Special Issue on Developmental Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 131-162, 2007.
26. K. O. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen, Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies, Evolutionary Computation, vol. 10, pp. 99-127, 2002.
27. P. Johnson-Laird, Jazz improvisation: A theory at the computational level, In Representing Musical Structure, ser. Cognitive Science Series. London, UK: Academic Press Limited, 1991, ch. 9.