A meta-analysis to compare Dacron versus polytetrafluroethylene grafts for above-knee femoropopliteal artery bypass

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 506-515

  Rychlik, Igor J ^a   Davey, Philip ^a   Murphy, Jamie ^b   O'Donnell, Mark E ^b,c  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT;

ABOVE KNEE FEMOROPOPLITEAL ARTERIAL BYPASS; AMPUTATION; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTERY OCCLUSION; CLAUDICATION; COMORBIDITY; CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA; DACRON IMPLANT; DATA BASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LEG ISCHEMIA; META ANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; PAIN; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; POLITEF IMPLANT; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR SURGERY;

BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMORAL ARTERY; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; ISCHEMIA; LOWER EXTREMITY; ODDS RATIO; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 84905114989     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: 10976809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.049     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. V.L. Roger, A.S. Go, D.M. Lloyd-Jones, R.J. Adams, J.D. Berry, and T.M. Brown et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Circulation 123 2011 e18 e209
2. G.J. Hankey, P.E. Norman, and J.W. Eikelboom Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease JAMA 295 2006 547 553
3. F.A. Schmieder, and A.J. Comerota Intermittent claudication: magnitude of the problem, patient evaluation, and therapeutic strategies Am J Cardiol 87 2001 3D 13D
4. W.C. Johnson, and K.K. Lee A comparative evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene, umbilical vein, and saphenous vein bypass grafts for femoral-popliteal above-knee revascularization: a prospective randomized Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study J Vasc Surg 32 2000 268 277
5. P.B. Kreienberg, R.C. Darling 3rd, B.J. Champagne, P.S. Paty, S.P. Roddy, and W.E. Lloyd et al. Early results of a prospective randomized trial of spliced vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene graft with a distal vein cuff for limb-threatening ischemia J Vasc Surg 35 2002 299 306
6. P. Klinkert, A. Schepers, D.H. Burger, J.H. van Bockel, and P.J. Breslau Vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial J Vasc Surg 37 2003 149 155
7. C.P. Twine, and A.D. McLain Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12 2010 CD001487
8. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed March 9, 2014.
9. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med 6 2009 1 27
10. I. Davidovic, N. Jakovljevic, D. Radak, M. Dragas, N. Ilic, and I. Koncar et al. Dacron or ePTFE graft for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass reconstruction. A bi-centre randomised study Vasa 39 2010 77 84
11. R.J. van Det, B.H. Vriens, J. van der Palen, and R.H. Geelkerken Dacron or ePTFE for femoro-popliteal above-knee bypass grafting: short- and long-term results of a multicenter randomised trial Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37 2009 457 463
12. L.P. Jensen, M. Lepantalo, J.E. Fossdal, O.C. Roder, B.S. Jensen, and M.S. Madsen et al. Dacron or PTFE for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. A multicenter randomised study Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34 2007 44 49
13. S. Post, T. Kraus, U. Muller-Reinartz, C. Weiss, H. Kortmann, and A. Quentmeier et al. Dacron vs polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for femoro-popliteal bypass: a prospective randomized multicenter trial Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 22 2001 226 231
14. C. Devine, and C. McCollum Heparin-bonded Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene for femoropopliteal bypass grafting: a multicenter trial J Vasc Surg 33 2001 533 539
15. C. Devine, and C. McCollum Heparin-bonded Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene for femoropopliteal bypass: five-year results of a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial J Vasc Surg 40 2004 924 931
16. W.M. Abbott, R.M. Green, T. Matsumoto, J.R. Wheeler, N. Miller, and F.J. Veith et al. Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: results of multicenter randomised prospective trial J Vasc Surg 25 1997 19 28
17. R.M. Green, W.M. Abbott, T. Matsumoto, J.R. Wheeler, N. Miller, and F.J. Veith et al. Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: five-year results of a randomized trial J Vasc Surg 31 2000 417 425
18. G.D. Griffiths, J. Nagy, D. Black, and P.A. Stonebridge Randomized clinical trial of distal anastomotic interposition vein cuff in infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting Br J Surg 91 2004 560 562