Psychosocial assessment of candidates and risk classification of patients considered for durable mechanical circulatory support

Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 836-841

  Maltby, Megan C ^a   Flattery, Maureen P ^b   Burns, Brigid ^c   Salyer, Jeanne ^d   Weinland, Stephan ^b   Shah, Keyur B ^b  

^a Department of Care Coordination ^*  (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARING   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

left ventricular assist device; modified psychosocial assessment of candidates for transplantation (mPACT); psychosocial assessment of candidates for transplantation (PACT); psychosocial outcomes

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ASSISTED CIRCULATION; CAREGIVER; CAUCASIAN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; LIFESTYLE; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF CANDIDATES FOR TRANSPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART FAILURE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84905086013     PISSN: 10532498     EISSN: 15573117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M.S. Slaughter, F.D. Pagani, and J.G. Rogers et al. Clinical management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in advanced heart failure J Heart Lung Transplant 29 2010 S2 39
2. M.E. Olbrisch, J.L. Levenson, and R. Hamer The PACT: a rating scale for the study of clinical decision making in psychosocial screening of organ transplant candidates Clin Transplant 3 1989 164 169
3. J.R. Maldonado, H. Dubois, and E. David et al. The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT): a new tool for the psychosocial evaluation of pre-transplant candidates Psychosomatics 2012 123 132
4. R.K. Twillman, C. Manetto, D.K. Wellisch, and D.L. Wolcott The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Psychosomatics 34 1993 144 153
5. M.E. Olbrisch, S.M. Benedict, K. Ashe, and J.L. Levenson Psychological assessment and care of organ transplant patients J Consult Clin Psychol 70 2002 771 783
6. J. Salyer, C.M. Schubert, and C. Chiaranai Supportive relationships, self-care confidence, and heart failure self-care J Cardiovasc Nurs 27 2012 384 393
7. M. Sebern, and B. Riegel Contributions of supportive relationships to heart failure self-care Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 8 2009 97 104
8. L. Calvillo-King, D. Arnold, and K.J. Eubank et al. Impact of factors on risk of readmission or mortality in pneumonia and heart failure: systematic review J Gen Intern Med 28 2013 269 282
9. L.W. Miller, and M. Guglin Patient selection for ventricular assist devices: a moving target J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 1209 1221
10. E.A. Rose, A.C. Gelijns, and A.J. Moskowitz et al. Long-term use of left ventricular assist device for end stage heart failure N Engl J Med 3345 2001 1435 1443
11. S.J. Forest, R. Bello, and P. Friedmann et al. Readmissions after ventricular assist device: etiologies, patterns and days out of hospital Ann Thorac Surg 95 2012 1276 1281
12. T. Hasin, Y. Marmor, and W. Kremers et al. Readmissions after implantation of axial flow ventricular assist device J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 153 163
13. N. Kocaman, Y. Kutlu, M. Ozkan, and S. Ozkan Predictors of psychosocial adjustment in people with physical disease J Clin Nurs 16 2007 6 16
14. M.S. Pepe Problems with risk reclassification methods for evaluating prediction models Am J Epidemiol 173 2011 1327 1335
15. S. Arora, P. Aukrust, and A. Andreassen et al. The prognostic importance of modifiable risk factors after heart transplantation Am Heart J 158 2009 431 436
16. I.J. Sanchez-Lazaro, L. Almenar, and L. Martinez-Dolz et al. Effect of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking on development of renal dysfunction after heart transplantation Transplant Proc 40 2008 3049 3050
17. T. Yagdi, L. Sharples, and S. Tsui et al. Malignancy after heart transplantation: analysis of 24 year experience at a single center J Card Surg 24 2009 572 579
18. A.K. Eschelman, S. Mason, H. Nemeh, and C. Williams LVAD destination therapy: applying what we know about psychiatric evaluation and management from cardiac failure and transplant Heart Fail Rev 14 2009 21 28
19. C.A. Vitale, R. Chandekar, P.E. Rodgers, F.D. Pagani, and P.N. Malani A call for guidance in the use of left ventricular assist devices in older adults J Am Geriatr Soc 60 2012 145 150
20. M.A. Dew, R.L. Kormos, L.H. Roth, S. Murali, A. DiMartini, and B.P. Griffith Early post-transplant medical compliance and mental health predicts physical morbidity and mortality 1 to 3 years after heart transplantation J Heart Lung Transplant 18 1999 549 562
21. S.A. Farmer, K.L. Grady, E. Wang, E.C. McGee, W.G. Cotts, and P.M. McCarthy Demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral factors associated with survival after heart transplantation Ann Thorac Surg 95 2013 876 883
22. J.G. Allen, E.S. Weiss, and G.J. Arnaoutakis et al. Insurance and education predict long-term survival after orthotopic heart transplantation in the United States J Heart Lung Transplant 31 2012 52 60