How big is the bioenergy piece of the energy pie? Who cares-it's pie!

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 111, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1717-1718

  Somerville, Chris ^a   Youngs, Heather ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ENERGY CROP; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENERGY YIELD; BIOTRANSFORMATION; METABOLISM; PLANT; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

BIOFUEL;

BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BIOTRANSFORMATION; ENERGY-GENERATING RESOURCES; PLANTS;

EID: 84905058252     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25312     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Greenblatt J, Wei M, Yang C, Richter B, Hannegan B, Youngs H. 2011. California's energy future-The view to 2050. California Council on Science and Technology (CCST). 64p. Available at: https://www.ccst.us/publications/2011/2011energy.pdf.
2. IEA. 2012. World energy outlook. 668p. Available at: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/publications/weo-2012/.
3. IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Mitigation of climate change. Working group III contribution to AR5. 12th session of working group III and the 39th session of the IPCC on 12 April 2014 in Berlin, Germany. Available at: http://mitigation2014.org/.
4. Kainuma M, Miwa K, Ehara T, Akashi O, Asayama Y. 2013. A low-carbon society: Global visions, pathways, and challenges. Climate Policy 13:5-21.
5. Keith DW. 2001. Sinks, energy crops and land use: Coherent climate policy demands an integrated analysis of biomass. Climatic Change 49:1-10.
6. McCollum D, Yang C, Yeh S, Ogden J. 2012. Deep greenhouse gas reduction scenarios for California-Strategic implications from the CA-TIMES energy-economic systems model. Energy Strategy Rev 1:19-32.
7. Michel H. 2012. Editorial: The nonsense of biofuels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51:2516-2518.
8. NAS. 2009. America's energy future: Technology and transformation: summary edition (The National Academies Press). Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12710.
9. Pacala S, Socolow R. 2004. Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968-972.
10. Slade R, Bauen A, Gross R. 2014. Global bioenergy resources. Nat Climate Change 4:99-105.
11. Williams JH, DeBenedictis A, Ghanadan R, Mahone A, Moore J, Morrow WR, Price S, Torn MS. 2012. The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: The pivotal role of electricity. Science 335:53-59.
12. Youngs H, Somerville CR. 2013. California's energy future-The potential for biofuels. California Council on Science and Technology (CCST). 55 p. Available at: https://ccst.us/publications/2013/2013biofuels.pdf.
13. Youngs H, Somerville CR. 2014. Best practices for biofuels. Science 344:1095-1096.