The role of imaging specialists as authors of systematic reviews on diagnostic and interventional imaging and its impact on scientific quality: Report from the EuroAIM evidence-based radiology working group

Radiology

Volumn 272, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 533-540

  Sardanelli, Francesco ^a,b   Bashir, Humayun ^c   Berzaczy, Dominik ^d   Cannella, Guglielmo ^a   Espeland, Ansgar ^e   Flor, Nicola ^f   Helbich, Thomas ^d   Hunink, Myriam ^g,h   Malone, Dermot E ⁱ   Mann, Ritse ^j   Muzzupappa, Claudia ^a   Petersen, Lars J ^k   Riklund, Katrine ^l   Sconfienza, Luca M ^a,b   Serafin, Zbigniew ^m   Spronk, Sandra ^g,n   Stoker, Jaap ^o   Van Beek, Edwin J R ^p   Vorwerk, Dierk ^q   Di Leo, Giovanni ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN DONATO   (Italy)

^c SHAUKAT KHANUM MEMORIAL CANCER HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE   (Pakistan)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^f FATEBENEFRATELLI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^g ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

ⁱ ST VINCENT S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^j RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^k AALBORG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^l UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^m NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

ⁿ IKAZIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^o UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^p UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^q KLINIKUM INGOLSTADT   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MEDICINE PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOLOGIST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRICS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLISHING; RADIOLOGY; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SPECIALIZATION;

EID: 84905041366     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131730     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Sardanelli F. Evidence-based radiology and its relationship with quality. In: Abujudeh HH, Bruno MA, eds. Quality and safety in radiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012; 256-290.
2. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268(17):2420-2425.
3. Malone DE. Evidence-based practice in radiology: an introduction to the series. Radiology 2007;242(1):12-14. (Pubitemid 44956004)
4. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://cebm.net/. Accessed February 2013.
5. Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ, Di Leo G, Krestin GP. Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 2010;20(1):1-15.
6. Medina LS, Blackmore CC. Evidence-based radiology: review and dissemination. Radiology 2007;244(2):331-336. (Pubitemid 47080866)
7. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London, England: BMJ Publishing Group, 2008.
8. Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA 1998;280(3):222-224. (Pubitemid 28493887)
9. Gøtzsche PC, Hróbjartsson A, Johansen HK, Haahr MT, Altman DG, Chan AW. Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials. PLoS Med 2007;4(1):e19.
10. Mussurakis S. Authorship ethics in the radiological sciences. Australas Radiol 1994;38(1):2-5. (Pubitemid 24053470)
11. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane- handbook.org/. Updated March 2011. Accessed March 24, 2014.
12. Jørgensen AW, Hilden J, Gøtzsche PC. Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review. BMJ 2006;333(7572):782.
13. Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP. Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses? BMJ 2012;345:e7031.
14. U.S. Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. http://www.nap.edu/ catalog.php?record-id=13059. Published 2011. Accessed March 24, 2014.
15. European Institute for Biomedical Imaging Research. http://www.eibir.org/ . Accessed March 24, 2014.
16. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10.
17. Escobar PM, Nydegger U, Risch M, Risch L. The intellectual contribution of laboratory medicine professionals to research papers on laboratory medicine topics published in high-impact general medicine journals. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50(8):1305-1308.
18. Miguel-Dasit A, Martí-Bonmatí L, Sanfeliu P, Aleixandre R. Cardiac MR imaging: balanced publication by radiologists and cardiologists. Radiology 2007;242(2):410-416. (Pubitemid 46146194)
19. Fowler FJ Jr, McNaughton Collins M, Albertsen PC, Zietman A, Elliott DB, Barry MJ. Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 2000;283(24):3217- 3222. (Pubitemid 30422039)
20. Whitelaw A. At least one systematic reviewer must be a disease expert. BMJ 2012;345:e8011.
21. Dodd JD, MacEneaney PM, Malone DE. Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature. Eur Radiol 2004;14(5):915-922. (Pubitemid 38678916)
22. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
23. Bossuyt PM. Informative reporting of systematic reviews in radiology. Radiology 2013;269(2):313-314.