Archaeological-linguistic correlations in the formation of retroflex typologies and correlating areal features in South Asia

Archaeology and Language IV: Language Change and Cultural Transformation

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 139-148

  Tikkanen, Bertil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904923214     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203208793     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Barz, R.K. and A.V.N.Diller 1985. Classifiers and standardization: some South and South-East Asian comparisons. In Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics, No. 9:Language policy, language planning and sociolinguistics in South-East Asia D.Bradley (ed.), 155-184. Pacific Linguistics, A-67. Canberra: Australian National University.
2. Dasgupta, P. 1984. On conceiving of South Asia as a linguistic area. Indian Linguistics 43:37-48.
3. Èdel'man, D.I. 1963. Problema cerebralnyx v vostocšnoiranskix jazykax. Voprosy Jazykoznanija V, 67-81.
4. Èdel'man, D.I. 1968. Osnovnye voprosy lingvisticšeskoj geografii na materiale indoiranskix jazykov. Moscow: Nauka.
5. Èdel'man, D.I. 1976. Strukturnye 'anomalii' vostocšnoiranskix jazykov i tipologija substrata. In Studien zur allgemeinen und vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft Karl Ammer zum Gedanken, 79-93. Jena.
6. Èdel'man, D.I. 1980. K substratnomu naslediju central'noaziatskogo jazykogo sojuza. Voprosy Jazykoznanija V, 1-32.
7. Èdel'man, D.I. 1984. K substratnym javleniam v sintaksise iranskix jazykov. In Voprosy dialektologii i istorii jazyka, R.G.Gaffarov and V.B.Silina (eds), 34-41. Dušanbe.
8. Emeneau, M.B. 1980. Language and Linguistic Area. Essays selected and introduced by Anwar S.Dil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
9. Heston, W.L. 1980. Some areal features: Indian or Irano-Indian? International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 9, 141-157.
10. Heston, W.L. 1981. Review of Masica 1976. Indian Linguistics 10, 180-187.
11. Hock, H, H. 1975. Substratum influence on (Rig-Vedic) Sanskrit? Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 5, 76-125. [University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign].
12. Hock, H.H. 1984. (Pre-)Rig-Vedic convergence of Indo-Aryan with Dravidian? Another look at the evidence. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 14, 89-108. [University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign].
13. Masica, C. 1974. The basic order typology as a definer of an Indian linguistic area. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 3, 154-180.
14. Masica, C. 1976. Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Nakamura, G. 1993. The origins of rice cultivation: problems associated with finds of rice and Ishibocho in the northern Indian subcontinent. Bulletin of the Ancient Orient Museum, Tokyo XIV, 53-117.
16. Parpola, A. 1994. Deciphering the Indus Script. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Ramanujan, A.K. and C.Masica 1969. Toward a phonological typology of the Indian linguistic area. Current Trends in Linguistics 5, 543-577.
18. Southworth, F.C. 1974. Linguistic stratigraphy of northern India. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 3:201-223.
19. Tikkanen, B. 1987. The Sanskrit gerund: a synchronic, diachronic and typological analysis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Helsinki. Studia Orientalia 62. Helsinki.
20. Xu, C. 1991. The cultural links over the Himalaya ranges in the prehistoric period. Orient 27:12-35.
21. Zvelebil, K. 1970. Comparative Dravidian Phonology. Janua Linguarum, Series Practica 80. The Hague: Mouton.