An accelerometry-based methodology for assessment of real-world bilateral upper extremity activity

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Bailey, Ryan R ^a   Klaesner, Joseph W ^b   Lang, Catherine E ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; FACE VALIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION METHOD; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REAL WORLD BILATERAL UPPER EXTREMITY ACTIVITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; VALIDATION PROCESS; AGED; ARM; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PROCEDURES;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84904906404     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103135     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. McCombe Waller S, Whitall J (2008) Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits? NeuroRehabilitation 23: 29-41.
2. Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, Schaefer SY, Birkenmeier RL (2012) Assessment of Upper Extremity Impairment, Function, and Activity After Stroke: Foundations for Clinical Decision Making. J Hand Ther.
3. Barreca S, Gowland CK, Stratford P, Huijbregts M, Griffiths J, et al. (2004) Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection. Top Stroke Rehabil 11: 31-42. (Pubitemid 39658416)
4. Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Gorber SC, et al. (2008) A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5: 56.
5. Adams SA, Matthews CE, Ebbeling CB, Moore CG, Cunningham JE, et al. (2005) The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol 161: 389-398. (Pubitemid 40256210)
6. Jobe JB (2000) Cognitive processes in self report. In: A.A S, Turkann JS, Bachrach CA, Jobe JB, Kurtzman HS et al., editors. The science of self-report: implications for research and practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 25-28.
7. Rand D, Eng JJ (2010) Arm-hand use in healthy older adults. Am J Occup Ther 64: 877-885.
8. van der Pas SC, Verbunt JA, Breukelaar DE, van Woerden R, Seelen HA (2011) Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92: 1437-1442.
9. Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, Zeringue A, Hobbs L, et al. (2006) Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87: 1340-1345. (Pubitemid 44470751)
10. Uswatte G, Miltner WH, Foo B, Varma M, Moran S, et al. (2000) Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. Stroke 31: 662-667. (Pubitemid 30131652)
11. Welk GJ (2005) Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37: S501-511.
12. Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR, Jr. (2004) Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36: 1637-1645. (Pubitemid 39202636)
13. Schasfoort FC, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ (2002) Ambulatory measurement of upper limb usage and mobility-related activities during normal daily life with an upper limb-activity monitor: a feasibility study. Med Biol Eng Comput 40: 173-182. (Pubitemid 34578402)
14. Bailey RR, Lang CE (2013) Upper-limb activity in adults: referent values using accelerometry. J Rehabil Res Dev 50: 1213-1222.
15. ActiGraph website. Available: https://help.theactigraph.com/entries/ 21702957-ActiGraph-Data-Conversion-Process. Accessed 2014 July 7.
16. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR, Jr., et al. (2011) 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43: 1575-1581.
17. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J (1998) Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30: 777-781. (Pubitemid 28211005)
18. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, et al. (2007) Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39: 1423-1434. (Pubitemid 47344026)
19. Borod JC, Caron HS, Koff E (1984) Left-handers and right-handers compared on performance and preference measures of lateral dominance. Br J Psychol 75 (Pt 2): 177-186.
20. Steenhuis RE (1999) The relation between hand preference and hand performance: what you get depends on what you measure. Laterality 4: 3-26.
21. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates. xxi, 567 p.
22. Bao L, Intille SS (2004) Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. Lect Notes Comput Sc 3001/2004: 1-17.
23. Slifkin AB, Newell KM (1998) Is variability in human performance a reflection of system noise? Current Directions in Psychological Science 7: 170-177. (Pubitemid 128188165)
24. Stergiou N, Decker LM (2011) Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection? Hum Mov Sci 30: 869-888.
25. Preece SJ, Goulermas JY, Kenney LP, Howard D (2009) A comparison of feature extraction methods for the classification of dynamic activities from accelerometer data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56: 871-879.
26. Staudenmayer J, Pober D, Crouter S, Bassett D, Freedson P (2009) An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. J Appl Physiol (1985) 107: 1300-1307.
27. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, Stam HJ, Ribbers GM, Bussmann JB (2012) Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: a study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upper-limb use in daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93: 1975-1981.
28. Lang CE, Beebe JA (2007) Relating movement control at 9 upper extremity segments to loss of hand function in people with chronic hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 21: 279-291. (Pubitemid 46633594)