The dilemma of spatial representation for urban hydrology semi-distributed modelling: Trade-offs among complexity, calibration and geographical data

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 517, Issue , 2014, Pages 997-1007

  Petrucci, Guido ^a,b   Bonhomme, Céline ^b  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b Universite Paris Est   (France)

Author keywords

Geographical data; Semi distributed models; Spatial distribution; Suspended solids; Urban drainage

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; DIGITAL STORAGE; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER CONTROL SYSTEMS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; LAND USE; MODEL STRUCTURES; RUNOFF; WATER QUALITY;

ALTERNATIVE CONFIGURATIONS; GEOGRAPHICAL DATA; GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION; SEMI-DISTRIBUTED MODEL; SEMI-DISTRIBUTED MODELLING; SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED PARAMETERS; SUSPENDED SOLIDS; URBAN DRAINAGE;

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

CATCHMENT; DATA SET; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LAND USE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; URBAN DRAINAGE; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 84904898293     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.019     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bertrand-Krawjewski J.L. Stormwater pollutant loads modelling: epistemological aspects and case studies on the influence of field data sets on calibration and verification. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55:1-17.
2. Beven K., Binley A.M. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol. Process. 1992, 18:1747-1750.
3. Beven K. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J. Hydrol. 2006, 320:18-36.
4. Dotto C., Kleidorfer M., Deletic A., Fletcher T.D., McCarthy D.T., Rauch W. Stormwater quality models: performance and sensitivity analysis. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62(4):837.
5. Dotto C., Mannina G., Kleidorfer M., Vezzaro L., Henrichs M., McCarthy D.T., Freni G., Rauch W., Deletic A. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling. Water Res. 2012, 46(8):2545-2558.
6. Egodawatta P., Thomas E., Goonetilleke A. Mathematical interpretation of pollutant wash-off from urban road surfaces using simulated rainfall. Water Res. 2007, 41(13):3025-3031.
7. Egodawatta P., Thomas E., Goonetilleke A. Understanding the physical processes of pollutant build-up and wash-off on roof surfaces. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407(6):1834-1841.
8. Elliott A.H., Trowsdale S.A. A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environ. Modell. Software 2007, 22:394-405.
9. European Union, 2007. Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 Establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE), in Official Journal of the European Communities, 25th of April 2007.
10. Fallah Shorshani M., Bonhomme C., Petrucci G., Andre´ M., Seigneur C. Road traffic impact on urban water quality: a step towards integrated traffic, air and stormwater modelling. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21(8):5297-5310.
11. Gaume E., Villeneuve J.P., Desbordes M. Uncertainty assessment and analysis of the calibrated parameter values of an urban storm water quality model. J. Hydrol. 1998, 210(1):38-50.
12. Gironas J., Niemann J.D., Roesner L.A., Rodriguez F., Andrieu H. Evaluation of methods for representing urban terrain in storm-water modeling. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2010, 15(1):1-14.
13. IGN, 2009. BD TOPO. Descriptif de contenu. (BD TOPO. Content description). Version 2, Institut Ge´ographique National (IGN), France.
14. Jakeman A.J., Hornberger G.M. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29(8):2637-2649.
15. Jankowfsky, S., Branger, F., Braud, I., Rodriguez, F., Debiome, S., Wallet, P., 2011. Influence of urban expansion on the hydrology of small catchments: development of the suburban PUMMA model by coupling of urban and rural hydrological models. 12th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Porto Alegre/Brazil, 11-16 September 2011.
16. Kanso A., Chebbo G., Tassin B. Stormwater quality modelling in combined sewers: calibration and uncertainty analysis. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 52(3):63-71.
17. Kirchner J.W. Getting the right answers for the right reasons: linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(3).
18. Kleidorfer M., Deletic A., Fletcher T.D., Rauch W. Impact of input data uncertainties on urban stormwater model parameters. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 60(6):1545-1554.
19. Kuczera G., Mroczkowski M. Assessment of hydrologic parameter uncertainty and the worth of multiresponse data. Water Resour. Res. 1998, 34(6):1481-1489.
20. Lacour, C., 2009. Apport de la mesure en continu pour la gestion de la qualite´ des effluents de temps de pluie en re´seau d'assainissement (Contribution of continuous turbidity measurements to the management of effluent quality in sewer systems during wet weather). PhD Thesis, Universite´ Paris-Est, 3rd of November 2009, p. 330.
21. Me´tadier M., Bertrand-Krajewski J.-L. The use of long-term on-line turbidity measurements for the calculation of urban stormwater pollutant concentrations, loads, pollutographs and intra-event fluxes. Water Res. 2012, 46(20):6836-6856.
22. Muleta M.K., Nicklow J.W. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model. J. Hydrol. 2005, 306:127-145.
23. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10(3):282-290.
24. Obropta C.C., Kardos J.S. Review of urban stormwater quality models: deterministic, stochastic, and hybrid approaches. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2007, 43(6):1508-1523.
25. Perrin C., Michel C., Andre´assian V. Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J. Hydrol. 2001, 242(3-4):275-301.
26. Petrucci G., Rioust E., Deroubaix J.-F., Tassin B. Do stormwater source control policies deliver the right hydrologic outcomes?. J. Hydrol. 2013, 485:188-200.
27. Reggiani P., Schellekens J. Rainfall-runoff modelling: distributed models. Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences 2005, 1967-1983. John Wiley & Sons, New York. M.G. Andersen (Ed.).
28. Rodriguez F., Andrieu H., Creutin J.D. Surface runoff in urban catchments: morphological identification of unit hydrographs from urban databanks. J. Hydrol. 2003, 283(1):146-168.
29. Rossmann, L.A., 2004. Storm water management model User's manual version 5.0. EPA, Water Supply and Water Resources Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
30. Sartor J.D., Boyd G.B., Agardy F.J. Water pollution aspects of street surface contaminants. J. (Water Pollut. Control Federation) 1974, 46(3):458-467.
31. Savic D., Khu S. Evolutionary computing in hydrological sciences. Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences 2005, 331-348. John Wiley & Sons, New York. M.G. Andersen (Ed.).
32. Singh V.P. Hydrologic systems, Vol. I: Rainfall runoff modelling. Englewood Cliffs 1988, Prentice Hall, NJ, p. 480.
33. Siriwardene N.R., Perera B.J.C. Selection of genetic algorithm operators for urban drainage model parameter optimisation. Math. Comput. Modell. 2006, 44:415-429.
34. van Griensven A., Meixner T., Grunwald S., Bishop T., Diluzio M., Srinivasan R. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J. Hydrol. 2006, 324(1-4):10-23.
35. Vezzaro L., Mikkelsen P.S. Application of global sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification in dynamic modelling of micropollutants in stormwater runoff. Environ. Modell. Software 2012, 27:40-51.
36. Wicke D., Cochrane T.A., O'Sullivan A. Build-up dynamics of heavy metals deposited on impermeable urban surfaces. J. Environ. Manage. 2012, 113:347-354.
37. Zoppou C. Review of urban storm water models. Environ. Modell. Software 2001, 16(3):195-231.