Dependence evolution of hydrological characteristics, applied to floods in a climate change context in Quebec

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 519, Issue PA, 2014, Pages 148-163

  Ben Aissia, M A ^a   Chebana, F ^a   Ouarda, T B M J ^a,b   Roy, L ^c   Bruneau, P ^c   Barbet, M ^c  

^a CENTRE EAU TERRE ENVIRONNEMENT   (Canada)

^b KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

^c HYDRO QUÉBEC   (Canada)

Author keywords

Break point detection; Climate change; Dependence evolution; Dependence measures; Flood characteristics; Stationarity

Indexed keywords

BREAKPOINT; DEPENDENCE EVOLUTION; DEPENDENCE MEASURES; FLOOD CHARACTERISTICS; STATIONARITY;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; FLOOD DAMAGE; FLOOD FREQUENCY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

CANADA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 84904891956     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.042     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bates, B., Kundzewicz, Z.W., Wu, S., Palutikof J., 2008. Climate Change and Water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat. Geneva 210pp.
2. Bayley G.V., Hammersley J.M. The "effective" number of independent observations in an autocorrelated time series. Suppl. J. Royal Statist. Soc. 1946, 8(2):184-197.
3. Ben Aissia M.A., Chebana F., Ouarda T.B.M.J., Roy L., Desrochers G., Chartier I., Robichaud E´. Multivariate analysis of flood characteristics in a climate change context of the watershed of the Baskatong reservoir, Province of Que´bec, Canada. Hydrol. Process. 2011, 26(1):130-142.
4. Best D.J., Roberts D.E. Algorithm AS 89: the upper tail probabilities of Spearman's rho. Appl. Stat. 1975, 24:377-379.
5. Bisson J.L., Roberge F. Pre´vision des apports naturels: Expe´rience d'Hydro-Que´bec 1983, Paper presented at the Workshop on flow predictions, Toronto.
6. Brochu R., Laprise R. Surface water and energy budgets over the Mississippi and Columbia River basins as simulated by two generations of the Canadian regional climate model. Atmos. Ocean 2007, 45(1):19-35.
7. Bronstert A. Floods and climate change: interactions and impacts. Risk Anal. 2003, 23(3):545-557.
8. Carlstein E. The use of subseries values for estimating the variance of a general statistic from a stationary sequence. Ann. Stat. 1986, 14(3):1171-1179.
9. Chan S.O., Bras R.L. Urban storm water management: distribution of flood volumes. Water Resour. Res. 1979, 15(2):371-382.
10. Chebana F., Ouarda T.B.M.J. Multivariate quantiles in hydrological frequency analysis. Environmetrics 2011, 22(1):63-78.
11. Co´rdova J.R., Rodri´guez-Iturbe I. On the probabilistic structure of storm surface runoff. Water Resour. Res. 1985, 21(5):755-763.
12. Davison A.C., Hinkley D.V. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York.
13. DiCiccio T.J., Efron B. Bootstrap confidence intervals. Stat. Sci. 1996, 11:189-228.
14. Douglas E.M., Vogel R.M., Kroll C.N. Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation. J. Hydrol. 2000, 240(1-2):90-105.
15. Efron E. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1987, 82:171-185.
16. Fleming S.W., Clarke G.K.C. Autoregressive noise, deserialization, and trend detection and quantification in annual river discharge time series. Canad. Water Resour. J. 2002, 27(3):335-354.
17. Fortin J.P., Moussa R., Bocquillon C., Villeneuve J.P. Hydrotel, un mode`le hydrologique distribue´ pouvant be´ne´ficier des donne´es fournies par la te´le´de´tection et les syste`mes d'information ge´ographique. Revue des sciences de l'eau 1995, 8(1):97-124.
18. Goel N.K., Kurothe R.S., Mathur B.S., Vogel R.M. A derived flood frequency distribution for correlated rainfall intensity and duration. J. Hydrol. 2000, 228(1-2):56-67.
19. Gordon C., Cooper C., Senior C.A., Banks H., Gregory J.M., Johns T.C., Mitchell J.F.B., Wood R.A. The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Clim. Dyn. 2000, 16(2-3):147-168.
20. Hamed K.H., Ramachandra Rao A. A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. J. Hydrol. 1998, 204(1-4):182-196.
21. Hipel, K.W., McLeod, A.I., 2005. Time Series Modelling of Water Resources and Environmental Systems.
22. Hollander, M., Wolfe, D.A., 1973. Nonparametric Statistical Metho, Wiley.
23. Jungclaus J.H., Keenlyside N., Botzet M., Haak H., Luo J.J., Latif M., Marotzke J., Mikolajewicz U., Roeckner E. Ocean circulation and tropical variability in the coupled model ECHAM5/MPI-OM. J. Clim. 2006, 19(16):3952-3972.
24. Kao S.C., Govindaraju R.S. A bivariate frequency analysis of extreme rainfall with implications for design. De Michele, C. 2007, 112(D13):D13119.
25. Kao S.C., Govindaraju R.S. Probabilistic structure of storm surface runoff considering the dependence between average intensity and storm duration of rainfall events. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43(6):W06410.
26. Kendall M.G. Rank Correlation Methods 1975, Griffin, London.
27. Khaliq M.N., Ouarda T.B.M.J., Gachon P., Sushama L., St-Hilaire A. Identification of hydrological trends in the presence of serial and cross correlations: a review of selected methods and their application to annual flow regimes of Canadian rivers. J. Hydrol. 2009, 368(1-4):117-130.
28. Kulkarni A., Von-Storch H. Monte Carlo experiments on the effect of serial correlation on the Mann-Kendall test of trend. Meteorol. Z. 1995, 4(2).
29. Mann H.B. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometric 1945, 13:245-259.
30. Music B., Caya D. Evaluation of the hydrological cycle over the Mississippi River Basin as Simulated by the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM). J. Hydrometeorol. 2007, 8(5):969-988.
31. Pacher, G.W., 2006. De´termination objective des parame`tres des hydrogrammes. Montre´al, Ouranos: 8.
32. Patton A., Politis D.N., White H. Correction to "automatic block-length selection for the dependent bootstrap" by D. Politis and H. White. Econ. Rev. 2009, 28(4):372-375.
33. Politis D.N., White H. Automatic block-length selection for the dependent bootstrap. Patton, Andrew 2004, 23(1):53-70.
34. Reynard N.S., Prudhomme C., Crooks S.M. The flood characteristics of large U.K. Rivers: potential effects of changing climate and land use. Clim. Change 2001, 48(2):343-359.
35. Seidou O., Ouarda T.B.M.J. Recursion-based multiple change point detection in multiple linear regression and application to river stream flows. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43(7):W07404.
36. Shiau J.T. Return period of bivariate distributed extreme hydrological events. Stoch. Env. Res. Risk Assess. 2003, 17(1-2):42-57.
37. Wood E.F. An analysis of the effects of parameter uncertainty in deterministic hydrologic models. Water Resour. Res. 1976, 12(5):925-932.
38. Yue S., Ouarda T.B.M.J., Bobe´e B., Legendre P., Bruneau P. The Gumbel mixed model for flood frequency analysis. J. Hydrol. 1999, 226(1-2):88-100.
39. Yue S., Pilon P., Phinney B., Cavadias G. The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series. Hydrol. Process. 2002, 16(9):1807-1829.
40. Yue S., Wang C.Y. The Mann-Kendall test modified by effective sample size to detect trend in serially correlated hydrological series. Water Resour. Manage. 2004, 18(3):201-218.
41. Zhang L., Singh V.P. Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula method. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2006, 11(2):150-164.
42. Zhang X., Harvey K.D., Hogg W.D., Yuzyk T.R. Trends in Canadian stream flow. Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37(4):987-998.