Maximizing social psychological contributions to addressing social issues: The benefits of an interdisciplinary perspective

Bridging Social Psychology: Benefits of Transdisciplinary Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 403-408

  Esses, Victoria M ^a   Semenya, Antoinette H ^a   Stelzl, Monika ^a   Dovidio, John F ^b   Hodson, Gordon ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904836212     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410616982     Document Type: Chapter

References (12)

1. Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. L. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer's theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951-972.
2. Dovidio, J. F., Brigham, J., Johnson, B. T., & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 276-319). New York: Guilford.
3. Espenshade, T. J., & Hempstead, K. (1996). Contemporary American attitudes toward U.S. immigration. International Migration Review, 30, 535-570.
4. Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 389-412.
5. Esses, V. M., Hodson, G., & Dovidio, J. F. (2004). Public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: Determinants and policy implications. In C. M. Beach, A. G. Green, & J. G. Reitz (Eds.), Canadian immigration policy for the 21st century (pp. 507-535). Montreal, Canada: McGill Queen's Press.
6. International Metropolis Project. (2005). Introduction. Retrieved September 7, 2005, from http://www.international.metropolis.net/frameset_e.html.
7. Jackson, J. S., Brown, K. T., Brown, T. N., & Marks, B. (2001). Contemporary immigration policy orientations among dominant-group members in Western Europe. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 431-456.
8. Perea, J. F. (Ed.). (1997). Immigrants out! The new nativism and the anti-immigrant impulse in the United States. New York: New York University Press.
9. Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice as a group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586-611.
10. Reitz, J. G. (2004). Canada: Immigration and nation-building in the transition to a knowledge economy. InW. A. Cornelius, T. Tsuda, P. L. Martin, & J. F. Hollifield, (Eds.), Controlling immigration: A global perspective (2nd ed., pp. 79-113). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Wilson, T. C. (2001). Americans' views on immigration policy: Testing the role of threatened group interests. Sociological Perspectives, 44, 485-501.