"Problems may cut right across the borders": Why we cannot do without interdisciplinarity

Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Theory and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 3-17

  Ellis, R J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904828439     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203928707     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Anzaldúa, Gloria. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
2. Bechtel, W. (Ed.) (1986). Integrating scientific disciplines Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
3. Bennett, T. (1998). Culture: A reformer's science London: Sage.
4. Berger, G. (1970). Introduction. OECD-CERI interdisciplinarity-Problems of teaching and research in universities. Nice: CERI/French Ministry of Education.
5. Campbell, D. (1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif and C. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 328-348). Chicago: Aldine.
6. Cluck, N. A. (1980). Reflections on the interdisciplinary approach to the humanities. Liberal Education, 66(1), 67-77.
7. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington: COSEPUP. Retrieved November 15, 2006, from http://fermat.nap.edu/books/0309094356/html/27.html.
8. Fish, S. (1994). There's no such thing as free speech, and it's a good thing, too New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Foster, H. (1998). Trauma studies and the interdisciplinary: An overview. In Alex Coles and Alexia Defert (Eds.), The anxiety of interdisciplinarity (pp. 157-168). London: BACKless Books.
10. Frank, R. (1988). Interdisciplinary: The first half-century. In E. G. Stanley and T. F. Hoad (Eds.), Words: for Robert Burchfield's sixty-fifty birthday (pp. 91-102). Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer.
11. Gozzer, G. (1982). Interdisciplinarity: A concept still unclear. Prospects, 12(3), 281-292.
12. Graff, G. (1987). Professing literature Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Klein, J. T. (1999). Mapping interdisciplinary studies. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. http://www.is. wayne.edu/jklein/.
14. Klein, J. T. (2000). A conceptual vocabulary of interdisciplinary science. In Weingart and Stehr (pp. 3-24).
15. Kline, S. J. (1995). Conceptual foundations for multidisciplinary thinking Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space Trans. David Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Leitch, V. B., and Ruiz, N. III (2005). Theory, interdisciplinarity and the humanities today:An interview with Vincent B. Leitch. Inter Culture 2 (May), 1-14. http://www.fsu.edu/%7Eproghum/intercuture/VBL%20Interview.htm. Accessed 07 August 2005.
18. Liu, A. (1989). The power of formalism: The new historicism, ELH: English Literary History, 56(4) (Winter), 721-771.
19. Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (Reprint ed.). Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20. Maasen, S. (2000). Inducing interdisciplinarity. In Weingart and Stehr (pp. 173-193).
21. Messer-Davidow, E., Shumway, D. R., and Sylvan, D. J. (1993). Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
22. Moran, J. (2002). Interdisciplinarity London: Routledge.
23. Ortega y Gasset, J. (1930). The revolt of the masses (Reprinted 1957). New York: Norton.
24. Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge New York:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
25. Pratt, M. L. (1992). Imperial eyes: Studies in travel writing and transculturation London: Routledge.
26. Pratt, M. L. (1999). Arts of the Contact Zone. In D. Bartholmae and A. Petrosky (Eds.), Ways of reading (pp. 581-595). New York: Bedford St. Martins.
27. Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Sarkar, S. (1996). The emergence of logical empiricism: From 1900 to the Vienna Circle New York:Garland Publishing.
29. Sjölander, S. (1985). Long-term and short-term interdisciplinary work: Difficulties, problems and pitfalls. In L. Levin and I. Lind (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity revisited (pp. 85-101). Stockholm:OECD, SNBUC, Linköping University.
30. Turner, S. (2000). What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different? In Weingart and Stehr (pp. 46-65).
31. Turner, V. (1977). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32. Turner, V. (1987). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites of passage. In C. Mahdi, S. Foster, and M. Little (Eds.), Betwixt and between: Patterns of masculine and feminine initiation (pp. 3-19). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
33. Weingart, P., and Stehr, N. (2000). Practising interdisciplinarity, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.