Redefining Culture: Perspectives Across the Disciplines

Redefining Culture: Perspectives Across the Disciplines

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-260

  Baldwin, John R ^a   Faulkner, Sandra L ^b   Hecht, Michael L ^c   Lindsley, Sheryl L ^d  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904828126     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410617002     Document Type: Book

References (73)

1. Alexander, J. C., & Seidman, S. (Eds.). (1990). Culture and society: Contemporary debates. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Arnold, M. (1967). Poetry and prose (Ed. J. Bryson). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Baldwin, J. R., & Hecht, M. L. (1995). The layered perspective of cultural (in)tolerance(s): The roots of a multidisciplinary approach. In R.Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 59-91). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
4. Baldwin, J. R., & Hecht, M. L. (2003). Unpacking group-based hatred: A holographic look at identity and intolerance. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (10th ed, pp. 354-364.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
5. Baldwin, J. R., & Lindsley, S. L. (1994). Conceptualizations of culture. Tempe, AZ: Urban Studies Center.
6. Barnett,G. A., & Lee,M. (2002). Issues in intercultural communication research. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (2nd ed., pp. 275-290). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
7. Barthes,R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Selected & Trans.).NewYork: Hill andWang.
8. Barthes, R. (1975). S/Z (R. Miller, Trans.). London: Jonathan Cape.
9. Barthes, R. (1977). The pleasure of the text (R. Miller, Trans.; S. Heath, Ed.). New York:Hill and Wang.
10. Baxter, L.A. (1991). Content analysis. In B.M. Montgomery & S. Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal communication (pp. 239-254). New York: Guilford.
11. Baxter, L.A. (2004). Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1-22.
12. Bell,D. A. (1992). Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism.New York: Basic Books.
13. Berger, A. A. (1998). Media analysis techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
14. Berry, J.W. (2004). Fundamental psychological processes in intercultural relations. In D. Landis, J.M. Bennett, & M. J. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (3rd ed., pp. 166-184). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
15. Burke,K. (1966). Language as symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986).Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Connor, S. (1997). Postmodernist culture: An introduction to theories of the contemporary. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Conquergood, D. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs, 58, 179-194.
19. Cook, D. (1996). The culture industry revisited: Theodor W. Adorno on mass culture. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
20. Craig,R.T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119-161.
21. Crenshaw, K., et al. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: New Press.
22. Delgado, R. (Ed.) (1995). Critical race theory: The cutting edge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23. Denzin,N.K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 1-34). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
24. du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay,H., & Negus,K. (1997). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. London: Sage.
25. Duncan, J. (1990). The city as text: The politics of landscape interpretation in the Kandyan Kingdom. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
26. Elder, G., Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (1998). Le pratique sauvage: Race, place, and the human-animal divide. In J.Wolch & J. Emel (Eds.), Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands (pp. 72-90). London: Verso.
27. Giddens,A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley:University of California.
28. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
29. Goodenough, W. (1963). Cooperation in change. New York: Russell Sage.
30. Gramsci. A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. (Q.Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith, Eds. & Trans.). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
31. Grossberg, L. (1993). Cultural studies and/in new worlds. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10, 1-22.
32. Hall, S. (1996). The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. In D. Morley & K. H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 25-46). London:Routledge.
33. Harris, M. (1964). The nature of cultural things. New York: Random House.
34. Harris, M. (1999) Theories of culture in postmodern times.Walnut Creek: Altamira.
35. Hecht,M. L. (1993). 2002-A research odyssey: Toward the development of a communication theory of identity. Communication Monographs, 60, 76-82.
36. Hecht, M. L., & Baldwin, J. R. (1998). Layers and holograms: A new look at prejudice. M. L. Hecht (Ed.), Communication of prejudice (pp. 57-84). Thousand Oaks:Sage.
37. Hecht,M. L., Jackson, R. J., II, & Pitts,M. J. (In press). Culture. In Harwood, J. & Giles, H. (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives. NY: Peter Lang.
38. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Abridged ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage.
39. Hofstede,G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (rev. ed.).New York:McGraw-Hill.
40. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T.W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments (G. S. Noerr, Ed.; E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford: Standford University.
41. Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckholn, C. (1944). Configuration of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42. Levi-Strauss, C. (1977). The elementary structures of kinship (rev. ed.; J. H. Bell, J. R. von Sturmer, & R. Needham, Trans.; R. Needham, Ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.
43. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.
44. Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
45. Martin, J. N., Nakayama, T. K., & Flores, L. A. (2002). A dialectical approach to intercultural communication. In J.N. Martin,T.K. Nakayama, & L.A. Flores (Eds.), Readings in intercultural communication (2nd ed., pp. 3-13). Boston: McGraw Hill.
46. Marx, K. (1975). Early writings ®. Livingstone & G. Benton, Trans.). Harmondsworth:Penguin.
47. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Mokros, H. B. (2003).A constitutive approach to identity. In H. B.Mokros (Ed.), Identity matters (pp.3-28). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
49. Moore, J. D. (1997). Visions of culture: An introduction to anthropological theories and theorists. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
50. Mulhern, F. (2000). Culture/metaculture. London: Routledge.
51. Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. New York: Routledge.
52. Poole,M. S. (1992). Group communication and the structuring process. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (pp. 147-177). Dubuque, IA:Wm. C. Brown.
53. Quayson, A. (2000).Postcolonialism: Theory, practice, or process? Cambridge,UK: Polity.
54. Robben: A. C. G. (1995). Who's afraid of post-, modern, and ism? In K. Geuijen,D. Raven, & J. deWolf (Eds.), Postmodernism and anthropology (pp. 136-160). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
55. Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Postmodernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton: Princeton University.
56. Samovar, L.A., & Porter,RE. (2003). Understanding intercultural communication: An introduction and overview. In L.A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication:A reader (10th ed., pp. 6-17). Belmont, CA: Thompson/Wadsworth.
57. Sauer, C. O. (1941). Foreward to historical geography. Annals, Association of American Geographers, 31, 1-24.
58. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview.NewYork: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
59. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
60. Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
61. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparisons. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between groups (pp. 61-76). London: Academic Press.
62. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup relations. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-17). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
63. Talbot, M. (1991). The holographic universe. New York: Harper Perennial.
64. Turner, C. V. (1968). The Sinasina "big man" complex:Acentral cultural theme. Practical Anthropology, 15, 16-21.
65. Tylor, P. B. (1994) Collected works. Routledge: London.
66. van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
67. Weber,M. (1948) In H.H. Gerth, & C.W. Mills (Eds.). From MaxWeber: Essays in sociology (pp. 180-195). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
68. Williams, R. (1961). The long revolution. New York: Columbia University Press.
69. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. New York: Oxford University Press.
70. Winkler, K. J. (1994, December 14). Anthropologists urged to rethink their definitions of culture. The Chronicle of Higher Education, A18.
71. Worsley, P. (1984). The three worlds: Culture and world development. London:Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
72. Young, R. J. C. (2003). Postcolonialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Zelinsky, W. (1973). The cultural geography of the United States. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.