Modelling reveals endogenous osmotic adaptation of storage tissue water potential as an important driver determining different stem diameter variation patterns in the mangrove species Avicennia marina and Rhizophora stylosa

Annals of Botany

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 667-676

  Vandegehuchte, Maurits W ^a   Guyot, Adrien ^b   Hubeau, Michiel ^a   De Swaef, Tom ^c   Lockington, David A ^b   Steppe, Kathy ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Avicennia marina; dendrometer; endogenous control; Functional structural modelling; growth; mangrove; mechanistic model; osmotic regulation; osmotic water potential; plant water relations; Rhizophora stylosa; sap flow; stem diameter variation

Indexed keywords

CARBON; DIAMETER; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; IN SITU MEASUREMENT; MANGROVE; NUMERICAL MODEL; OSMOSIS; PLANT WATER RELATIONS; SAP FLOW; STEM;

AVICENNIA MARINA; RHIZOPHORA STYLOSA;

WATER;

ADAPTATION; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; AVICENNIA; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENVIRONMENT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; OSMOSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT STEM; RHIZOPHORACEAE; XYLEM;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AVICENNIA; ENVIRONMENT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSMOSIS; PLANT STEMS; RHIZOPHORACEAE; WATER; XYLEM;

EID: 84904786580     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct311     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ball MC. 1988. Ecophysiology of mangroves. Trees: Structure and Function 2: 129-142
2. Betsch P, Bonal D, Breda N, et al. 2011. Drought effects on water relations in beech: the contribution of exchangeable water reservoirs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151: 531-543
3. Brun R, Kühni M, Siegrist H, Gujer W, Reichert P. 2002. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters: systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Research 36: 4113-4127
4. Buck AL. 1981. New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement factor. Journal of Applied Meteorology 20: 1527-1532
5. Dainty J. 1963. Water relations of plant cells. In: Preston RD, ed. Advanced Botanical Research. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 279-326
6. Dale JE, Sutcliffe JF. 1986. Water relations of plant cells. In: Steward FC. ed. Plant Physiology, Water and Solutes in Plants. Orlando: Academic Press, 1-48
7. Daudet FA, Ameglio T, Cochard H, Archilla O, Lacointe A. 2005. Experimental analysis of the role of water and carbon in tree stem diameter variations. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 135-144
8. Fereres E, Goldhamer DA. 2003. Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 78: 139-144
9. Geiger DR, Servaites JC, Fuchs MA. 2000. Role of starch in carbon translocation and partitioning at the plant level. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 571-582
10. Génard M, Fishman S, Vercambre G, et al. 2001. A biophysical analysis of stem and root diameter variations in woody plants. Plant Physiology 126: 188-202
11. Green PB, Cummins WR. 1974. Growth rate and turgor pressure: auxin effect studies with an automated apparatus for single coleoptiles. Plant Physiology 54: 863-869
12. Green PB, Erickson RO, Buggy J. 1971. Metabolic and physical control of cell elongation rate: in vivo studies in Nitella. Plant Physiology 47: 423-430
13. Helton JC, Davis FJ. 2003. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering&System Safety 81: 23-69
14. Hinckley TM, Bruckerhoff DN. 1975. The effects of drought onwater relations and stem shrinkage of Quercus alba. Canadian Journal of Botany 53: 62-72
15. Hölttä T, Vesala T, Sevanto S, Peramaki M, Nikinmaa E. 2006. Modeling xylem and phloem water flows in trees according to cohesion theory and Munch hypothesis. Trees: Structure and Function 20: 67-78
16. Hölttä T, Mencuccini M, Nikinmaa E. 2009. Linking phloem function to structure: analysis with a coupled xylem-phloem transport model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 259: 325-337
17. Hsiao TC, Xu LK. 2000. Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: biophysical analysis and relation to water transport. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 1595-1616
18. Hsiao TC, Frensch J, Rojas-Lara BA. 1998. The pressure-jump technique shows maize leaf growth to be enhanced by increases in turgor only when water status is not too high. Plant Cell and Environment 21: 33-42
19. Komor E. 2000. Source physiology and assimilate transport: the interaction of sucrose metabolism, starch storage and phloem export in source leaves and the effects on sugar status in phloem. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 497-505
20. Kramer PJ, Boyer JS. 1995. Water relations of plants and soils. New York: Academic Press
21. Krauss KW, Ball MC. 2013. On the halophytic nature of mangroves. Trees: Structure and Function 27: 7-11
22. Krauss KW, Lovelock CE, McKee KL, Lopez-Hoffman L, Ewe SML, Sousa WP. 2008. Environmental drivers in mangrove establishment and early development: a review. Aquatic Botany 89: 105-127
23. Lockhart JA. 1965. An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 8: 264-275
24. Lopez-Portillo J, Ewers FW, Angeles G. 2005. Sap salinity effects on xylem conductivity in two mangrove species. Plant Cell and Environment 28: 1285-1292
25. Lovdahl L, Odin H. 1992. Diurnal changes in the stem diameter of Norway spruce in relation to relative humidity and air temperature. Trees: Structure and Function 6: 245-251
26. Matimati I, Musil CF, Raitt L, February EC. 2012. Diurnal stem diameter variations showCAMand C-3 photosyntheticmodes andCAM-C-3switches in arid South African succulent shrubs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 161: 72-79
27. McIntyre D. 1980. Basic relationships for salinity evaluation from measurements on soil solution. Soil Research 18: 199-206
28. Molz FJ, Klepper B. 1973. On the mechanism of water-stress-induced stem deformation. Agronomy Journal 65: 304-306
29. Naidoo G. 2006. Factors contributing to dwarfing in the mangrove Avicennia marina. Annals of Botany 97: 1095-1101
30. Page TJ, Marshall JC, Hughes JM. 2012. The world in a grain of sand: evolutionarily relevant, small-scale freshwater bioregions on subtropical dune islands. Freshwater Biology 57: 612-627
31. De Pauw DJW, Steppe K, De Baets B. 2008a. Identifiability analysis and improvement of a tree water flow and storage model. Mathematical Biosciences 211: 314-332
32. De Pauw DJW, Steppe K, De Baets B. 2008b. Unravelling the output uncertainty of a treewater flowand storage model using several global sensitivity analysis methods. Biosystems Engineering 101: 87-99
33. Peramaki M, Nikinmaa E, Sevanto S, et al. 2001.Tree stem diameter variations and transpiration in Scots pine: an analysis using a dynamic sap flowmodel. Tree Physiology 21: 889-897
34. Popp M. 1984a. Chemical composition of Australian mangroves. 2. Low molecular weight carbohydrates. Zeitschrift Für Pflanzenphysiologie 113: 411-421
35. Popp M. 1984b. Chemical composition of Australian mangroves. 1. Inorganic ions and organic acids. Zeitschrift Für Pflanzenphysiologie 113: 395-409
36. Popp M, Polania J, Weiper M. 1993. Physiological adaptations to different salinity levels in mangrove. In: Leith H, Masoom A eds. Towards the rational use of high salinity tolerant plants. New York: Springer
37. Rada F, Goldstein G, Orozco A, Montilla M, Zabala O, Azocar A. 1989. Osmotic and turgor relations of three mangrove ecosystem species. Functional Plant Biology 16: 477-486
38. Robert EMR, Koedam N, Beeckman H, Schmitz N. 2009. A safe hydraulic architecture as wood anatomical explanation for the difference in distribution of the mangroves Avicennia and Rhizophora. Functional Ecology 23: 649-657
39. Saveyn A, Steppe K, Ubierna N, Dawson TE. 2010. Woody tissue photosynthesis and its contribution to trunk growth and bud development in young plants. Plant Cell and Environment 33: 1949-1958
40. De Schepper V, Steppe K. 2010. Development and verification of a water and sugar transport model using measured stem diameter variations. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 2083-2099
41. De Schepper V, Steppe K, Van Labeke M-C, Lemeur R. 2010. Detailed analysis of double girdling effects on stem diameter variations and sap flow in young oak trees. Environmental and Experimental Botany 68: 149-156
42. De Schepper V, van Dusschoten D, Copini P, Jahnke S, Steppe K. 2012. MRI links stem water content to stem diameter variations in transpiring trees. Journal of Experimental Botany 63: 2645-2653
43. De Schepper V, DeSwaef T, Bauweraerts I, Steppe K. 2013. Phloem transport: a review of mechanisms and controls. Journal of Experimental Botany 64: 4839-4850
44. Schmitz N, Robert EMR, Verheyden A, Kairo JG, Beeckman H, Koedam N. 2008. A patchy growth via successive and simultaneous cambia: key to success of the most widespread mangrove species. Avicennia marina? Annals of Botany 101: 49-58
45. Sevanto S, Vesala T, Peramaki M, Nikinmaa E. 2002. Time lags for xylem and stem diameter variations in a Scots pine tree. PlantCell and Environment 25: 1071-1077
46. Sevanto S, Vesala T, Peramaki M, Nikinmaa E. 2003. Sugar transport together with environmental conditions controls time lags between xylem and stem diameter changes. Plant Cell and Environment 26: 1257-1265
47. Sevanto S, Holtta T, Holbrook NM. 2011. Effects of the hydraulic coupling between xylem and phloem on diurnal phloem diameter variation. Plant Cell and Environment 34: 690-703
48. Sobrado MA. 2005. Leaf characteristics and gas exchange of the mangrove Laguncularia racemosa as affected by salinity. Photosynthetica 43: 217-221
49. Steppe K, De Pauw DJW, Lemeur R, Vanrolleghem PA. 2006. A mathematical model linking tree sap flowdynamics to daily stem diameter fluctuations and radial stem growth. Tree Physiology 26: 257-273
50. Steppe K, De Pauw DJW, Lemeur R. 2008.Astep towards newirrigation scheduling strategies using plant-based measurements and mathematical modelling. Irrigation Science 26: 505-517
51. Steppe K, Cochard H, Lacointe A, Ameglio T. 2012. Could rapid diameter changes be facilitated by a variable hydraulic conductance? Plant Cell and Environment 35: 150-157
52. De Swaef T, Steppe K. 2010. Linking stem diameter variations to sap flow, turgor and water potential in tomato. Functional Plant Biology 37: 429-438
53. De Swaef T, Steppe K, Lemeur R. 2009. Determining reference values for stem water potential and maximum daily trunk shrinkage in young apple trees based on plant responses to water deficit. Agricultural Water Management 96: 541-550
54. De Swaef T, Driever SM, Van Meulebroek L, Vanhaecke L, Marcelis LFM, Steppe K. 2013a. Understanding the effect of carbon status on stem diameter variations. Annals of Botany 111: 31-46
55. DeSwaef T, Hanssens J, Cornelis A, Steppe K. 2013b. Non-destructive estimation of root pressure using sap flow, stem diameter measurements and mechanistic modelling. Annals of Botany 111: 271-282
56. Tyree MT, Jarvis PG. 1982.Water in tissues and cells. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H eds. Physiological plant ecology II. Berlin: Springer
57. Vandegehuchte MW, Steppe K. 2012. Sapflow+: a four-needle heat-pulse sap flow sensor enabling nonempirical sap flux density and water content measurements. New Phytologist 196: 306-317
58. Vandegehuchte MW, Steppe K. 2013. Sap flux density measurement methods: working principles and applicability. Functional Plant Biology 40: 213-223
59. Zimmermann U, Zhu JJ, Meinzer FC, et al. 1994. High molecular weight organic compounds in the xylem sap of mangroves: implications for longdistance water transport. Botanica Acta 107: 218-229
60. Zweifel R, Item H, Hasler R. 2000. Stem radius changes and their relation to stored water in stems of young Norway spruce trees. Trees: Structure and Function 15: 50-57
61. Zweifel R, Item H, Hasler R. 2001. Link between diurnal stem radius changes and tree water relations. Tree Physiology 21: 869-877