Grounded theory: Innovative methodology or a critical turning from hegemonic methodological praxis in tourism studies

The Critical Turn in Tourism Studies: Innovative Research Methods

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 197-210

  Jennings, Gayle ^a,b   Junek, Olga ^c  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904769609     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780080470986     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Belk, R., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry, J. (1989). Development recognition of consumption symbolism. Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (June), 1-37.
2. Charmaz, K. (1997). Identity dilemmas of chronically ill men. In: A. Strauss, & J. Corbin (Eds), Grounded theory in practice (pp. 35-63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Charmaz, K. (2003a). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 249-291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Charmaz, K. (2003b). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In: J. A. Holstein, & J. F. Gubrium (Eds), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 311-330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Clawson, M. (1963). Land and water for recreation: Opportunities, problems and policies. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
7. Cohen, E. (1988). Traditions in the qualitative sociology of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15, 29-46.
8. Comte, A. (2000). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte (Vol. 1). [Translated by H. Martineau. Kitchener: Batoche books] [Available at: http://www.ecn.bris.ac.uk/het/comte/philos1.pdf].
9. Connell, J., & Lowe, A. (1997). Generating grounded theory from qualitative data: The application of inductive methods in tourism and hospitality management research.. Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3(2), 165-173.
10. Daengbuppha, J., Hemmington, N., & Wilkes, K. (2004). Using grounded theory approach:Theoretical and practical issues in modelling heritage visitor experience. In: K. A. Smith, & C. Schott (Eds), Proceedings of the New Zealand Tourism and Hospitality Research Conference 2004, 8-10 December. Wellington (pp. 64-78s).
11. Dann, G. M. S. (2005). The theoretical state of the art in the sociology and anthropology of tourism. Tourism Analysis, 10, 3-15.
12. Dey, I. (2004). Grounded theory. In: C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds), Qualitative research practice (pp. 80-93). London: Sage.
13. Ford, J. (1975). Paradigms and fairy tales: An introduction to the science of meanings (Vol. 1). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. In: Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight (pp. 412-453). New York: Basic Books.
15. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
16. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
17. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
18. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
19. Goulding, C. (1998). Grounded theory: The missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda. Qualitative Marketing Research: An International Journal, 1(1), 50-57.
20. Goulding, C. (1999). Heritage, nostalgia and the "grey?" consumer. Journal of Marketing Practice:Applied Marketing Science, 5(6-8), 177-199.
21. Goulding, C. (2000). The commodification of the past, postmodern pastiche, and the search for authentic experiences at contemporary heritage attraction. European Journal of Marketing, 34(7), 835-853.
22. Guba, E. C. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In: E. C. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. E. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
24. Hall, C. M. (2004). Reflexivity and tourism research: Situating myself and/with others. In:J. Phillimore, & L. Goodson (Eds), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 137-155). London: Routledge.
25. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Milton Keyes: Open University Press.
26. Hardy, A. (2005). Using grounded theory to explore xplore stakeholder perceptions of tourism. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 3(2), 108-133.
27. Hillman, W. (2001). Searching for authenticity and experience: Backpackers travelling in Australia. TASA Conference, University of Sydney.
28. Hobson, J. S. P. (2003). The case for more exploratory and grounded tourism research, Martin Oppermann Memorial Lecture 2001. Pacific Tourism Review, 6(2), 73-81.
29. Hollinshead, K. (1996). The tourism researcher as bricoleur: The new wealth and diversity in qualitative inquiry. Tourism Analysis, 1, 67-74.
30. Hutchinson, S. A. (1988). Education and grounded theory. In: R. Sherman, & R. B. Webb (Eds), Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods (pp. 123-140). New York: The Falmer Press.
31. Jamal, T., & Hollinshead, K. (2001). Tourism and the forbidden zone: The underserved power of qualitative inquiry. Tourism Management, 22(February): [Online] Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com.library (pp. 1-33), 20/04/05.
32. Jennings, G. R. (1997). The travel experience of cruisers. In: M. Oppermann (Ed.), Pacific Rim 2000:Issues, interrelations, inhibitors (pp. 94-105). London: CAB International.
33. Jennings, G. R. (1999). Voyages from the centre to the margins: An ethnography of long term ocean cruisers. Unpublished PhD thesis. Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
34. Jennings, G. R. (2001). Tourism research. Brisbane: Wiley.
35. Jennings, G. R. (2003). Tourism research: Theoretical paradigms and accountability. Targeted research: The gateway to accountability: TTRA 34th Annual Conference Proceedings [CD Rom], June 15-18, St. Louis, MO, USA.
36. Jennings, G. R. (2005a). Advances in tourism research: Theoretical paradigms and accountability. Theoretical advances in tourism economics. Portugal: Evora. March 15-19, 2005.
37. Jennings, G. R. (2005b). Business research, theoretical paradigms that inform. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (pp. 211-217). [Online] Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com.library (pp. 211-217), 29/04/05. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38. Jennings, G. R. (2005c). Caught in the irons: One of the lived experiences of cruising women. Tourism Research International, 9(2), 177-193.
39. Jennings, G. R. (2005d). Interviewing - A focus on qualitative techniques. In: B. W. Ritchie, P. Burns, & C. Palmer (Eds), Tourism research methods: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 99-117). London: CAB International Tourism/Leisure Series.
40. Johns, N., & Gyimothy, S. (2002). Mythologies of a theme park: An icon of family life. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 8(4), 320-331.
41. Jorgensen, D. (1989). Participant observation, a methodology for a human studies. In: Applied Social Research Methods Series 15. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Junek, O. (2004). A qualitative inquiry into leisure and travel patterns of international students: Part 1 -background and methodology. The 2nd Asia-Pacific CHRIE (APacCHRIE) Conference & the 6th Biennial Conference on Tourism in Asia, 2004, Conference Proceedings. May 27-29, Phuket, Thailand.
43. Killion, K. L. (1992). Understanding tourism, study guide. Rockhampton: Central Queensland University.
44. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Macbeth, J. (1985). Ocean cruising, a study of affirmative deviance. Unpublished PhD thesis, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
47. Mehmetoglu, M., & Olsen, K. (2003). Talking authenticity: What kind of experiences do solitary travelers in the Norwegian Lofoten Islands regard as authenticity? ? Tourism, Culture and Communication, 4(3), 137-152.
48. Metcalf, W. (1986). Dropping out and staying in: Recruitment, socialisation and commitment engendered in contemporary alternative lifestyles. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Griffith University.
49. Pamphilon, B. (1999). The zoom model: A dynamic framework for the analysis of life histories. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(3, special edition), 393-410.
50. Phillimore, J., & Goodson, L. (2004). Progress in qualitative research in tourism: Epistemology, ontology and methodology. In: J. Phillimore, & L. Goodson (Eds), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 3-29). London: Routledge.
51. Punch, K. (1998). Introduction to social research - Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London:Sage.
52. Riley, R. W. (1995). Prestige-worthy behaviour. Annals of tourism research, 22(3), 630-649.
53. Riley, R. W. (1996). Revealing socially constructed knowledge through quasi structured interviews and grounded theory analysis. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 15(2), 21-40.
54. Riley, R. W., & Love, L. L. (2000). The state of qualitative tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(1), 164-187.
55. Rynehart, R. L. (2004). Foruming: A theory of influencing organisational change. Unpublished PhD. Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia.
56. Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A. L. (1973). Field research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
57. Scheurich, J. J. (1997). Research methods in the postmodern. London: The Falmer Press.
58. Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Tribe, J. (2004). Knowing about tourism: Epistemological issues. In: J. Phillimore, & L. Goodson (Eds), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 46-62). London: Routledge.
65. Walle, A. H. (1997). Quantitative versus qualitative tourism research. Annals of Tourism, 24(3), 524-536.
66. Woodside, A., MacDonald, R., & Burford, M. (2004). Grounded theory of leisure travel. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 17(1), 7-40.