Surface analysis of water quality response to load

Proceedings of the International Conference on Estuarine and Coastal Modeling

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 566-584

  Wang, Ping ^a   Linker, Lewis C ^b   Batiuk, Richard A ^b  

^a UMCES CBPO   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPHYLL; ESTUARIES; NITROGEN; NUTRIENTS; PHOSPHORUS; SEDIMENTS; SURFACE ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY;

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES; LOADING CONDITION; RESPONSE SURFACE; SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT; SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATIONS; WATER QUALITY INDEXES; WATER QUALITY RESPONSE; WATER QUALITY STANDARD;

LOADING;

EID: 84904740377     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/40628(268)36     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Batiuk, R.A., Bergstrom, P., Kemp, M., and 14 others (2000). Chesapeake Bay submerged aquatic vegetation water quality and habitat-based requirements and restoration targets: a second technical synthesis. USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD, USA, 217pp.
2. Bicknell, B.R., Imhoff, J.C, Kittle, J.L, Donigian, A.D. and Johanson, R.C., (1997). Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN, User's manual for version 11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, GA, USA., EPA/600/R-97/080, 755p.
3. Cerco, CF. and Cole, T.M. (1993). Three-dimensional eutrophication model of Chesapeake Bay. J. Envir. Engrg., 119(6): 1006-1025.
4. Cerco, CF., and Cole, T.M. (1994). Three-dimensional eutrophication model of Chesapeake Bay. Technical Report EL-94-4, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksbutg, MS, USA.
5. Chesapeake Executive Council (1987). Chesapeake Bay Agreement. Annapolis, MD, USA.
6. Chesapeake Executive Council (2000). Chesapeake 2000. Annapolis, MD, USA.
7. Donigian, A.S., Bicknell, B.R., Patwardhan, A.S., Linker, L.C, Alegre, D.Y., Change, C.H., and Reynolds, R. (1991). Watershed model application to calculate Bay nutrient loadings. Aqua Terra Consultants for USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD, USA, 283pp.
8. Gillelan, M.E., Haberman, H., Mackieman, G.B., Macknis, J. and Wells, H.W. (1983). Chesapeake Bay: A framework for action. USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD, USA.
9. Johnson, B., Kim, K, Heath, R., Hsieh, B. and Butler, L. (1993). Validation of a three-dimensional hydrohynamic model of Chesapeake Bay. J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 199(1): 2-20.
10. Officer, C.B., Biggs, R.B., Taft, J.L, Cronin, L.B., Tyler, M.A. and Boynton, W.R. (1984). Chesapeake Bay anoxia: origin, development and significance. Science, 233:22-27.
11. Schaffner, L.C., Friedrichs, CT., and Dauer, D.M. (2002). Review of the benthic process model with recommendations for future modeling efforts. Electronic text Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.).
12. Thomann, R.V., Collier, J.R., Butt, A., Casman, E. and Linker, L.C. (1994). Response of the Chesapeake Bay water quality model to loading scenarios. Modeling Subcommittee, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, MD, USA. CBP/TRS 101/94.
13. Walker, T. (1982). Use of a Secchi disk to measure attenuation of underwater light for photosynthesis. J. Appl. Eco., 8:225-232.
14. Wang, P., Linker, L., Batiuk, R. and Shenk, K. (2002). Assessment of impact of storm on point source pollutant transport in estuary by dissolved tracer modeling. Water Qual. Ecosys. Model., 1: 253-268.