-
1
-
-
84936527430
-
Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity
-
Berger, J. O., & Berry, D. A. (1988). Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. American Scientist, 76, 159-165.
-
(1988)
American Scientist
, vol.76
, pp. 159-165
-
-
Berger, J.O.1
Berry, D.A.2
-
2
-
-
0003576417
-
Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information theoretic approach
-
(2002), (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. Cumming, G, New York, NY: Routledge
-
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
-
(2012)
Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-analysis
-
-
Burnham, K.P.1
Anderson, D.R.2
-
3
-
-
84891940182
-
The new statistics: Why and how
-
doi:10.1177/0956797613504966
-
Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7-29. doi:10.1177/0956797613504966
-
(2014)
Psychological Science
, vol.25
, pp. 7-29
-
-
Cumming, G.1
-
4
-
-
84904726226
-
The theory of probability
-
1961, (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J, Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: A comment on Cumming (2014)
-
Jeffreys, H. (1961). The theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: A comment on Cumming (2014). Psychological Science, 25, 1289-1290.
-
(2014)
Psychological Science
, vol.25
, pp. 1289-1290
-
-
Jeffreys, H.1
-
5
-
-
67649575560
-
Theory testing using quantitative predictions of effect size
-
doi:10.1111/j.1464- 0597.2008.00348.x
-
Velicer, W. F., Cumming, G., Fava, J. L., Rossi, J. S., Prochaska, J. O., & Johnson, J. (2008). Theory testing using quantitative predictions of effect size. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 589-608. doi:10.1111/j.1464- 0597.2008.00348.x
-
(2008)
Applied Psychology: An International Review
, vol.57
, pp. 589-608
-
-
Velicer, W.F.1
Cumming, G.2
Fava, J.L.3
Rossi, J.S.4
Prochaska, J.O.5
Johnson, J.6
-
6
-
-
67650349911
-
Bayesian versus frequentist inference
-
In H. Hoijtink, I. Klugkist, & P. A. Boelen (Eds.), New York, NY: Springer
-
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lee, M. D., Lodewyckx, T., & Iverson, G. (2008). Bayesian versus frequentist inference. In H. Hoijtink, I. Klugkist, & P. A. Boelen (Eds.), Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in psychology (pp. 181-207). New York, NY: Springer.
-
(2008)
Bayesian Evaluation of Informative Hypotheses In Psychology
, pp. 181-207
-
-
Wagenmakers, E.-J.1
Lee, M.D.2
Lodewyckx, T.3
Iverson, G.4
-
7
-
-
0031718823
-
Information processing deficits associated with developmental coordination disorder: A meta-analysis of research findings
-
Wilson, P. H., & McKenzie, B. E. (1998). Information processing deficits associated with developmental coordination disorder: A meta-analysis of research findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 829-840.
-
(1998)
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
, vol.39
, pp. 829-840
-
-
Wilson, P.H.1
McKenzie, B.E.2
|