Diagnostic evaluation of uterine artery Doppler sonography for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes

Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 515-519

  Barati, Mojgan ^a   Shahbazian, Nahid ^a   Ahmadi, Leila ^a   Masihi, Sara ^a  

^a AHVAZ JUNDISHAPUR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Adverse pregnancy outcome; Pre eclampsia; Uterine artery Doppler

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; UTERINE ARTERY;

EID: 84904696049     PISSN: 17351995     EISSN: 17357136     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Scission A, Hayes E. Uterine artery Doppler Flow studies in obstetric practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:121-6.
2. Barbieri C. Doppler ultrasound in high risk pregnancies. Department of Obstet Gynecol of the Center for Integral AĴention to Women's Health. Available from: http://www.gfmeroch/Medical_education_En/PGC-RH-2004/barbieri_review.htm. [Last accessed on 2010 Oct 6].
3. Ghi T, Youssef A, Piva M, Contro E, Segata M, Guasina F, et al. The prognostic role of uterine artery Doppler studies in patients with late - onset pre-eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:36.e1-5.
4. Toal M, Keating S, Machin G, Dodd J, Adamson SL, Windrim RC, et al. Determinants of adverse perinatal outcome in high - risk women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler images. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:330.e1-330-e7.
5. Harrinon K. Early Screening for pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:623-624
6. rd ed. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas Parkland Health and Hospital System. New York: McGraw Hill; 2010. Chapters: 16,34,36,38.
7. Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S, Bennasar M, Martínez JM, Puerto B, et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11-41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:128-132.
8. Sritippayawan S, Phupong V. Risk Assessment of Pre-eclampsia in Advanced Maternal Age by Uterine Arteries Doppler at17-21 Weeks of Gestation. J Med Assoc Thai 2007;90:1281-6.
9. th ed. Chapter 21. In: Arcara MM, editor. Maryland, U.S.: The Johns Hopkins Hospital; 2012. p. 252-527.
10. Becker R, Vonk R, Vollert W, Entezami M. Doppler Sonography of uterine arteries at 20-23 weeks: Risk assessmen of adverse pregnancy outcome by quantification of impedance and notch. J Perinat Med 2005;30:388-394.
11. Torres C, Raynor B. Uterine artery score and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a low- risk population. Am J Obstet Grynecol 2005;193:s167.
12. Bower S, Schuchter K, Campbell S. Doppler Ultrasound screening as part of routine antenatal scanning: Prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:989-994.
13. Valensise H, Bezzeccheri V, Rizzo G, Tranquilli AL, GarzeĴi GG, Romanini C. Doppler velocimetery of uterine artery as a screening test for gestational hypertension. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993;3:18-22.
14. Kleinrouweler CE, Bossuyt PM, Thilaganathan B, Vollebre KC, Ramírez JA, Ohkuchi A, et al. The added value of second trimester uterine artery Doppler in the identification of nulliparous women at increased risk for pre-eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;20:s182-3.