메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 957-

A more fitting term in the incidental findings debate: One term does not fit all situations

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; GENE NOMENCLATURE; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC RISK; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GENOME ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; CONSENSUS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; HUMAN GENOME; NOMENCLATURE;

EID: 84904665035     PISSN: 10184813     EISSN: 14765438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.266     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (8)

References (1)
  • 1
    • 84887627966 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Secondary variants -in defense of a more fitting term in the incidental findings debate
    • Advance online publication, May 22 2013 doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.89
    • Christenhusz GM, Devriendt K, Dierickx K: Secondary variants -in defense of a more fitting term in the incidental findings debate. Eur J Hum Genet 21: 1331-1334.: Advance online publication, May 22, 2013; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.89.
    • Eur J Hum Genet , vol.21 , pp. 1331-1334
    • Christenhusz, G.M.1    Devriendt, K.2    Dierickx, K.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.