Nanostructures and hydrophilicity influence osseointegration: A biomechanical study in the rabbit tibia

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1041-1050

  Wennerberg, Ann ^a   Jimbo, Ryo ^a   Stübinger, Stefan ^b   Obrecht, Marcel ^c   Dard, Michel ^c,d   Berner, Simon ^c  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c INSTITUT STRAUMANN AG   (Switzerland)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone healing; Hydrophilicity; Hydrophobicity; Implants; Nanostructures

Indexed keywords

NANOMATERIAL; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANIMAL; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; IMPLANT; INTERFEROMETRY; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURGERY; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANT; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; INTERFEROMETRY; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA;

EID: 84904614658     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12213     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abdel-Haq, J., Karabuda, C.Z., Arisan, V., Mutlu, Z. & Kurkcu, M. (2011) Osseointegration and stability of a modified sand-blasted acid-etched implant: an experimental pilot study in sheep. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 265-274.
2. Bornstein, M.M., Valderrama, P., Jones, A.A., Wilson, T.G., Seibl, R. & Cochran, D.L. (2008) Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19: 233-241.
3. Brunner, E. (2010) Sas standard procedures for the analysis of non-parametric data. (in german). http://saswiki.org/images/e/e3/5.KSFE-2001-brunner-Einsatz-von-SAS-Modulen-f%C3%BCr-die-nichtparametrische-Auswertung-von-longitudinalen-Daten.pdf.
4. Brunner, E. & Langer, F. (1999) Non-Parametric Variance Analysis of Longitudinal Data. München: R Oldenburg.
5. Buser, D., Broggini, N., Wieland, M., Schenk, R.K., Denzer, A.J., Cochran, D.L., Hoffmann, B., Lussi, A. & Steinemann, S.G. (2004) Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified sla titanium surface. Journal of Dental Research 83: 529-533.
6. Ellingsen, J.E., Johansson, C.B., Wennerberg, A. & Holmen, A. (2004) Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 19: 659-666.
7. Heberer, S., Kilic, S., Hossamo, J., Raguse, J.D. & Nelson, K. (2011) Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 546-551.
8. Hirakawa, Y., Jimbo, R., Shibata, Y., Watanabe, I., Wennerberg, A. & Sawase, T. (2012) Accelerated bone formation on photo-induced hydrophilic titanium implants: an experimental study in the dog mandible. Clinical Oral Implants Research doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02401.x.
9. Jimbo, R., Ono, D., Hirakawa, Y., Odatsu, T., Tanaka, T. & Sawase, T. (2011) Accelerated photo-induced hydrophilicity promotes osseointegration: an animal study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 13: 79-85.
10. Jimbo, R., Sawase, T., Baba, K., Kurogi, T., Shibata, Y. & Atsuta, M. (2008) Enhanced initial cell responses to chemically modified anodized titanium. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 10: 55-61.
11. Karabuda, Z.C., Abdel-Haq, J. & Arisan, V. (2011) Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 840-849.
12. Klein, M.O., Bijelic, A., Toyoshima, T., Gotz, H., von Koppenfels, R.L., Al-Nawas, B. & Duschner, H. (2010) Long-term response of osteogenic cells on micron and submicron-scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces: sequence of cell proliferation and cell differentiation. Clinical Oral Implants Research 21: 642-649.
13. Lang, N.P., Salvi, G.E., Huynh-Ba, G., Ivanovski, S., Donos, N. & Bosshardt, D.D. (2011) Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 349-356.
14. Li, S., Ni, J., Liu, X., Zhang, X., Yin, S., Rong, M., Guo, Z. & Zhou, L. (2012) Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface modified by ultraviolet irradiation: an in vitro study. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 100: 1587-1598.
15. Mamalis, A.A., Markopoulou, C., Vrotsos, I. & Koutsilirieris, M. (2011) Chemical modification of an implant surface increases osteogenesis and simultaneously reduces osteoclastogenesis: an in vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 619-626.
16. Mamalis, A.A. & Silvestros, S.S. (2011) Analysis of osteoblastic gene expression in the early human mesenchymal cell response to a chemically modified implant surface: an in vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 530-537.
17. Masaki, C., Schneider, G.B., Zaharias, R., Seabold, D. & Stanford, C. (2005) Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 650-656.
18. Mendonca, G., Mendonca, D.B., Simoes, L.G., Araujo, A.L., Leite, E.R., Duarte, W.R., Aragao, F.J. & Cooper, L.F. (2009) The effects of implant surface nanoscale features on osteoblast-specific gene expression. Biomaterials 30: 4053-4062.
19. Monjo, M., Lamolle, S.F., Lyngstadaas, S.P., Ronold, H.J. & Ellingsen, J.E. (2008) In vivo expression of osteogenic markers and bone mineral density at the surface of fluoride-modified titanium implants. Biomaterials 29: 3771-3780.
20. Ronold, H.J., Ellingsen, J.E. & Lyngstadaas, S.P. (2003) Tensile force testing of optimized coin-shaped titanium implant attachment kinetics in the rabbit tibiae. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 14: 843-849.
21. Sawase, T., Jimbo, R., Baba, K., Shibata, Y., Ikeda, T. & Atsuta, M. (2008) Photo-induced hydrophilicity enhances initial cell behavior and early bone apposition. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19: 491-496.
22. Shibata, Y., Suzuki, D., Omori, S., Tanaka, R., Murakami, A., Kataoka, Y., Baba, K., Kamijo, R. & Miyazaki, T. (2010) The characteristics of in vitro biological activity of titanium surfaces anodically oxidized in chloride solutions. Biomaterials 31: 8546-8555.
23. Sittig, C., Textor, M., Spencer, N.D., Wieland, M. & Vallotton, P.H. (1999) Surface characterization of implant materials c.P. Ti, ti-6al-7nb and ti-6al-4v with different pretreatments. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 10: 35-46.
24. Sul, Y.T., Byon, E.S. & Jeong, Y. (2004) Biomechanical measurements of calcium-incorporated oxidized implants in rabbit bone: effect of calcium surface chemistry of a novel implant. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 6: 101-110.
25. Sul, Y.T., Johansson, C. & Albrektsson, T. (2006) Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, tiunite, and osseotite implant surfaces. International Journal of Prosthodontics 19: 319-328.
26. Wennerberg, A. & Albrektsson, T. (2009) Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20(Suppl. 4): 172-184.
27. Wennerberg, A., Svanborg, L. M., Berner, S. & Andersson, M. (2013) Spontaneously formed nanostructures on titanium surfaces. Clinical Oral Implants Research 24: 203-209.