Introducing cost-plus-loss analysis into a hierarchical forestry planning environment

Annals of Operations Research

Volumn 219, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 415-431

  Duvemo, Karl ^a   Lämås, Tomas ^b   Eriksson, Ljusk Ola ^b   Wikström, Peder ^b  

^a Swedish Forest Agency   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904545128     PISSN: 02545330     EISSN: 15729338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1139-9     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agestam, E. (1985). En produktionsmodell för blandbestånd av tall, gran och björk i Sverige [A production model for mixed species stands of pine, spruce and birch in Sweden] (Rapport 15). Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, institutionen för skogsproduktion [In Swedish with English abstract].
2. Andersson, D. (2005). Approaches to integrated strategic/tactical forest planning (Report 16). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics.
3. Andersson, D., & Eriksson, L. O. (2007). Effects of temporal aggregation in integrated strategic/tactical and strategic forest planning. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(8), 965-981.
4. Anon. (1986). Områdeskalkyler-Skog: mellersta Sverige 1986/1987 [District accountings-forest: mid Sweden 1986/87] (Konsulentavdelningens rapporter, Allmänt nr 112) Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet.
5. Anon. (1994). Swedish forestry Act. Swedish national board of forestry, Jönköping, Sweden.
6. Bisschop, J., & Roelofs, M. (1999). AIMMS the user's guide. Paragon Decision Technology B. V., Haarlem, The Netherlands.
7. Borders, B. E., Harrison, W. M., Clutter, M. L., Shiver, B. D., & Souter, R. A. (2008). The value of timber inventory information for management planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38(8), 2287-2294.
8. Church, R. L. (2007). Tactical-level forest management models. In A. Weintraub, C. Romero, T. Bjørndal, & R. Epstein (Eds.) Handbook of operations research in natural resources. New York: Springer.
9. Davis, R. G., Johnson, K. N., Bettinger, P. S., & Howard, T. E. (2000). Forest management. New York: McGraw Hill.
10. Davis, R. G., & Martell, D. L. (1993). A decision support system that links short-term silvicultural operating plans with long-term forest level strategic plans. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 1078-1095.
11. Duvemo, K., Barth, A., & Wallerman, J. (2007). Evaluating sample plot imputation techniques as input in forest management planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37(11), 2069-2079.
12. Duvemo, K., & Lämås, T. (2006). The influence of forest data quality on planning processes in forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 21(4), 327-339.
13. Duvemo, K. (2009). The influence of data uncertainty on planning and decision processes in forest management. Diss. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae; 2009: 6.
14. Eid, T. (1993). Random errors and strategic planning in forestry. Norwegian Forest Research Institute. Medd. Skogforsk46(7).
15. Eid, T. (2000). Use of uncertain inventory data in forestry scenario models and consequential incorrect harvest decisions. Silva Fennica, 34(2), 89-100.
16. Eid, T., Gobakken, T., & Naesset, E. (2004). Comparing stand inventories for large areas based on photo-interpretation and laser scanning by means of cost-plus-loss analyses. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19(6), 512-523.
17. Epstein, R., Karlsson, J., Rönnqvist, M., & Weintraub, A. (2007). Harvest operational models in forestry. In A. Weintraub, C. Romero, T. Bjørndal, & R. Epstein (Eds.) Handbook of operations research in natural resources. New York: Springer.
18. Eriksson, L. O. (1983). Timber class formation by cluster analysis (Report No. 157). Department of Forest Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
19. Eriksson, M. (2004). Strategisk och taktisk planering samt länken där emellan-analys av planeringsprocessens genomförande vid SCA Skog [Strategic and tactical planning and the link between-analysis of implementation of the planning process at SCA Forest] (Report 207). Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences [In Swedish with English abstract].
20. Forsell, N. (2009). Planning under risk and uncertainty. Diss. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, 1652-6880; 2009: 39.
21. Gilabert, H., & McDill, M. E. (2010). Optimizing inventory and yield data collection for forest management planning. Forest Science, 56(6), 578-591.
22. Gunn, E. A. (2007). Models for strategic forest management. In A. Weintraub, C. Romero, T. Bjørndal, & R. Epstein (Eds.) Handbook of operations research in natural resources (pp. 317-341). New York: Springer.
23. Gustafsson, K., Larsson, M., Källman, U., & Eriksson, L. E. (2000). Logistical determinants in timber harvesting schedule. Accounting for geographical aspects in medium term forest planning. In Proceedings of the first world symposium on logistics in forest sector. Logistics in the forest sector (pp. 205-220). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki and IUFRO.
24. Hamilton, D. A. (1978). Specifying precision in natural resource inventories. In Proceeding from the workshop: integrated inventories of renewable natural resources, USDA Forest Service, Tucson, Arizona (pp. 276-281).
25. Hirshleifer, J., & Riley, J. G. (1979). The analytics of uncertainty and information-an expository survey. Journal of Economic Literature, XVII, 1375-1421.
26. Hoen, H. F., & Eid, T. (1990). En modell for analyse av behandlingsstrategier for en skog ved bestandssimulering og lineær programmering [A model for analysis of treatment strategies for a forest applying standwise simulations and linear programming] (Report 9/90). Norwegian Forest Research Institute [In Norwegian].
27. Holmström, H., Kallur, H., & Ståhl, G. (2003). Cost-plus-loss analyses of forest inventory strategies based on kNN-assigned reference sample plot data. Silva Fennica, 37(3), 381-398.
28. Holopainen, M., & Talvitie, M. (2006). Effect of data acquisition accuracy on timing of stand harvests and expected net present value. Silva Fennica, 40(3), 531-543.
29. Islam, M. N., Kurttila, M., Mehtätalo, L., & Haara, A. (2009). Analyzing the effects of inventory errors on holding-level forest plans: the case of measurement error in the basal area of the dominated tree species. Silva Fennica, 43(1), 71-85.
30. Jacobsson, J. (1986). Optimization and data requirements-a forest management planning problem. Ph. D. thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå.
31. Johnson, K. N., & Scheurman, H. L. (1977). Forest science monographs: Vol. 18. Techniques for prescribing optimal timber harvest and investment under different objectives. Discussion and synthesis.
32. Jonsson, B., Jacobsson, J., & Kallur, H. (1993). The forest management planning package, theory and application. Studia Forestalia Suecica, 189.
33. Kangas, A. S. (2010). Value of forest information. European Journal of Forest Research, 129(5), 863-874.
34. Kätsch, C. (2006). Precision forestry and information. In P. A. Ackerman, D. W. Längin, & M. C. Antonides (Eds.) Precision forestry in plantations, semi-natural and natural forests (pp. 175-186). Stellenbosch, South Africa: Stellenbosch University.
35. Larsson, M. (1994). The significance of data quality in compartmental forest registers in estimating volume growth and non-optimal losses-a study of final felling compartments in northern Sweden (Rapport 26). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biometry and Forest Management [In Swedish with English abstract].
36. Lämås, T. (1996). Forest management planning for biodiversity and timber production. Ph. D. thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, Umeå. Report 3.
37. McCall, J. J. (1982). The economics of information and uncertainty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Nelson, J., & Brodie, D. J. (1990). Comparison of random search algorithm and mixed integer programming for solving area-based forest plans. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 934-942.
39. Ollas, R. (1980). Nya utbytesfunktioner för träd och bestånd [New yield functions for trees and stands]. Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten 5 [In Swedish].
40. Richards, E., & Gunn, E. (2000). A model and tabu search method to optimize stand harvest and road construction schedules. Forest Science, 46(2), 188-203.
41. Savage, D. W., Martell, D. L., & Wotton, B. M. (2010). Evaluation of two risk mitigation strategies for dealing with fire-related uncertainty in timber supply modelling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 40(6), 1136-1154.
42. Savage, D. W., Martell, D. L., & Wotton, B. M. (2011). Forest management strategies for dealing with fire-related uncertainty when managing two forest seral stages. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41(2), 309-320.
43. Sessions, J., & Sessions, B. J. (1992). Post-new forestry tools for tactical planning. Western Wildlands, 17(4), 39-44.
44. Sprängare, B. (1975). A method for analysing the sensitivity of the long-range planning which depends on errors in stand data (Rapporter och uppsatser 87). Royal College of Forestry [In Swedish with English abstract].
45. Ståhl, G. (1992). A study on the quality of compartmentwise forest data acquired by subjective inventory methods (Report 24). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biometry and Forest Management [In Swedish with English summary].
46. Ståhl, G. (1994). Bootstrap-estimation of the cost-plus-loss minimizing number of plots in compartmentwise forest inventories. In G. Ståhl (Ed.) Optimizing the utility of forest inventory activities. Section of Forest mensuration and management. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Report 27.
47. Söderholm, J. (2002). De svenska skogsbolagens system för skoglig planering [Planning systems of Swedish forest companies] (Report 98). Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences [In Swedish with English abstract].
48. Tucker, H. (1962). An introduction to probability and mathematical statistics. New York: Academic Press.
49. Weintraub, A., & Cholaky, A. (1991). A hierarchical approach to forest planning. Forest Science, 37, 439-460.
50. Wikström, P. (2008). Jamförelse av ekonomi och produktion mellan trakthyggesbruk och blädning i skiktad granskog-analyser på beståndsnivå baserade påsimulering [Comparison of economic return between rotation-and continuous cover forestry in multi story spruce forests-analyses on stand level based on simulation] (Report 2008: 24). 48 pp. Swedish Forest Agency [In Swedish].
51. Yoshimoto, A. (1996). Tactical scheduling using zero-one integer programming. Journal of Forest Planning, 2, 13-24.