The CROWN Initiative: Journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health

International Breastfeeding Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Khan, Khalid ^a   Amir, Lisa H ^b,c  

^a Roy Coll of Obstet and Gynaecol   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bias (Epidemiology); Clinical trials; Consensus; Endpoint determination standards; Evidence based medicine; Guidelines; Research design standards; Systematic reviews; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904538419     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17464358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1746-4358-9-9     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, Tugwell P. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 2012, 13:132. 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132, 3472231, 22867278.
2. Meher S, Alfirevic Z. Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review. BJOG 2014, doi:10.1111/1471-0528.
3. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Gargon E. The COMET (core outcome measures in effectiveness trials) initiative. Trials 2011, 12(Suppl 1):A70.