Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Tilia amurensis

Beijing Linye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing Forestry University

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 54-63

  Dong, Dian ^a   Lin, Tian Xi ^b   Tang, Jing Yi ^c   Liu, Jing Chen ^d   Sun, Guo Wen ^b   Yao, Jie ^a   Cheng, Yan Xia ^a  

^a BEIJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b The Bureau for Administering Jiaohe Forestry Experimental Area   (China)

^c Baihe Forest Bureau of Jilin Province   (China)

^d Forestry Management Bureau of Yanbian   (China)

Author keywords

Allocation patterns; Allometric models; Biomass

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904501085     PISSN: 10001522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2014.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. CIENCIALA E, APLTAUER J, ČCERNY M, et al. Biomass functions applicable to European beech [J]. Journal of Forest Science, 2005, 51(4): 147-154.
2. WESTMAN W E, ROGERS R W. Biomass and structure of a subtropical eucalypt forest, North Stradbroke Island [J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 1977, 25(2): 171-191.
3. BOND-LAMBERTY B, WANG C, GOWER S T. Aboveground and belowground biomass and sapwood area allometric equations for six boreal tree species of northern Manitoba [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2002, 32(8): 1441-1450.
4. CHAMBERS J Q, SANTOS J, RIBEIRO R J, et al. Tree damage, allometric relationships, and above-ground net primary production in central Amazon forest [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 152(1): 73-84.
5. 2003.
6. 2001, 20(5): 564-575.
7. 2009, 45(8): 129-134.
8. TER-MIKAELIAN M T, KORZUKHIN M D. Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997, 97(1): 1-24.
9. WANG C K. Biomass allometric equations for 10 co-occurring tree species in Chinese temperate forests [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 222(1): 9-16.
10. ZIANIS D, MENCUCCINI M. Aboveground biomass relationships for beech (Fagus moesiaca Cz.) trees in Vermio Mountain, Northern Greece, and generalised equations for Fagus sp. [J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2003, 60(5): 439-448.
11. SMITH W B, BRAND G J. Allometric biomass equations for 98 species of herbs, shrubs, and small trees [R]. Newtown Square: USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, Research Note NC-299, 1983: 8.
12. 2013, 35(2): 1-9.
13. GUAN B T, CHENG Y J. Ground level diameter as an indicator of sapling structural root characteristics for Chamaecyparis obtuse var. formosana in northeastern Taiwan [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 173(1): 227-234.
14. 1984(2): 10-19.
15. 2010, 46(8): 22-32.
16. 2013, 19(4): 718-722.
17. 2009, 45(5): 54-59.
18. 2005, 16(12): 2236-2240.
19. 2010, 16(4): 529-533.
20. 2001, 12(3): 339-343.
21. 2008.
22. 1994, 10(2): 99-104.
23. 2009(2): 88-90.
24. 2012, 36(1): 30-38.
25. 2011, 31(14): 3918-3927.
26. HEGYI F. A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands [J]. Growth Models for Tree and Stand Simulation, 1974, 30: 74-90.
27. NELSON B W, MESQUITA R, PEREIRA J L G, et al. Allometric regressions for improved estimate of secondary forest biomass in the central Amazon [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1999, 117(1): 149-167.
28. TEAM R D C. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria: [EB/OL]. (2008-05-21) [2013-12-20]. http://www.R-project.org.
29. SCHMID I. The influence of soil type and interspecific competition on the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech [J]. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2002, 3(4): 339-346.
30. LEWIS S L, TANNER E V J. Effects of above-and belowground competition on growth and survival of rain forest tree seedlings [J]. Ecology, 2000, 81(9): 2525-2538.
31. LIM H, LEE K H, LEE K H, et al. Biomass expansion factors and allometric equations in an age sequence for Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) in southern Korea [J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2013: 18(4): 316-322.
32. PEICHL M, ARAIN M A. Allometry and partitioning of above- and belowground tree biomass in an age-sequence of white pine forests [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 253(1): 68-80.
33. LEVERENZ J W. Shade-shoot structure, photosynthetic performance in the field, and photosynthetic capacity of evergreen conifers [J]. Tree Physiology, 1996, 16(1-2): 109-114.
34. XIAO C W, CEULEMANS R. Allometric relationships for below- and aboveground biomass of young Scots pines [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 203(1): 177-186.
35. HOUGHTON R A, LAWRENCE K T, HACKLER J L, et al. The spatial distribution of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: a comparison of estimates [J]. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7 (7): 731-746.
36. 1985(5): 33-46.
37. 2013, 26(12): 4156-4163.
38. 2012, 32(8): 2447-2457.
39. NEWTON M, COLE E C. Root development in planted Douglas- fir under varying competitive stress [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1991, 21(1): 25-31.
40. CASPER B B, JACKSON R B. Plant competition underground [J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1997, 28(1): 545-570.
41. 2009, 33(2): 331-337.