The Challenge for the Next Generation of Medical Geneticists

Human Mutation

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 909-911

  Frebourg, Thierry ^a  

^a ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

CNV; Exome; Genetic variation; Genome wide association studies; Interpretation; NGS; VUS; WES; WGS

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; DEVICES; DNA SEQUENCE; EXOME; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENOTYPE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MEDICAL GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; DATABASES, GENETIC; EXOME; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETICS, MEDICAL; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOTYPE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84904431661     PISSN: 10597794     EISSN: 10981004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22592     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Boycott KM, Vanstone MR, Bulman DE, MacKenzie AE. 2013. Rare-disease genetics in the era of next-generation sequencing: discovery to translation. Nat Rev Genetics 14:681-691.
2. Bragin E, Chatzimichali EA, Wright CF, Hurles ME, Firth HV, Bevan AP, Swaminathan GJ. 2014. DECIPHER: database for the interpretation of phenotype-linked plausibly pathogenic sequence and copy-number variation. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D993-D1000.
3. Dorschner MO, Amendola LM, Turner EH, Robertson PD, Shirts BH, Gallego CJ, Bennett RL, Jones KL, Tokita MJ, Bennett JT, Kim JH, Rosenthal EA, et al. 2013. Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1, 000 participants' exomes. Am J Hum Genet 93:631-640.
4. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, Kalia SS, Korf BR, Martin CL, McGuire AL, Nussbaum RL, O'Daniel JM, Ormond KE, Rehm HL, Watson MS, et al. 2013. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 15:565-574.
5. Koboldt DC, Steinberg KM, Larson DE, Wilson RK, Mardis ER. 2013. The next-generation sequencing revolution and its impact on genomics. Cell 155:27-38.
6. Ng SB, Turner EH, Robertson PD, Flygare SD, Bigham AW, Lee C, Shaffer T, Wong M, Bhattacharjee A, Eichler EE, Bamshad M, Nickerson DA, et al. 2009. Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature 461:272-276.
7. Schork NJ, Murray SS, Frazer KA, Topol EJ. 2009. Common vs. rare allele hypotheses for complex diseases. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19:212-219.
8. Shashi V, McConkie-Rosell A, Rosell B, Schoch K, Vellore K, McDonald M, Jiang YH, Xie P, Need A, Goldstein DG. 2013. The utility of the traditional medical genetics diagnostic evaluation in the context of next-generation sequencing for undiagnosed genetic disorders. Genet Med 16:176-182.
9. Thompson BA, Spurdle AB, Plazzer JP, Greenblatt MS, Akagi K, Al-Mulla F, Bapat B, Bernstein I, Capellá G, den Dunnen JT, du Sart D, Fabre A, et al. 2014. Application of a 5-tiered scheme for standardized classification of 2, 360 unique mismatch repair gene variants in the InSiGHT locus-specific database. Nat Genet 46:107-115.
10. Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG, Bainbridge MN, Willis A, Ward PA, Braxton A, Beuten J, Xia F, Niu Z, Hardison M, Person R, et al. 2013. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med 369:1502-1511.