Comparative effectiveness of audit-feedback versus additional physician communication training to improve cancer screening for patients with limited health literacy

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1113-1121

  Price Haywood, Eboni G ^a   Harden Barrios, Jewel ^a   Cooper, Lisa A ^b  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

cancer screening; communication; health literacy; shared decision making; standardized patients

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIT FEEDBACK; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMMUNICATION SKILL; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATIENT COUNSELING; PHYSICIAN COMMUNICATION TRAINING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMMUNICATION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84904429751     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2782-4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S: Government Printing Office; 2000. November.
2. Mika VS, Kelly PJ, Price MA, Franquiz M, Villarreal R. The ABCs of health literacy. Fam Community Health. 2005;28:351-7. (Pubitemid 41413677)
3. Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:134-49. (Pubitemid 34546106)
4. Katz MG, Jacobson TA, Veledar E, Kripalani S. Patient literacy and question-asking behavior during the medical encounter: a mixedmethods analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:782-6. (Pubitemid 46763980)
5. Aboumatar HJ, Carson KA, Beach MC, Roter DL, Cooper LA. The Impact of Health Literacy on Desire for Participation in Healthcare, Medical Visit Communication, and Patient Reported Outcomes among Patients with Hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 May 21. [Epub ahead of print].
6. Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:339-59.
7. Griffith KA, McGuire DB, Royak-Schaler R, Plowden KO, Steinberger EK. Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans. Cancer. 2008;113:276-85.
8. Schueler KM, Chu PW, Smith-Bindman R. Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature. J Womens Health. 2008;17:1477-98.
9. Fox SA, Heritage J, Stockdale SE, Asch SM, Duan N, Reise SP. Cancer screening adherence: does physician-patient communication matter? Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75:178-84.
10. Buchanan AH, Skinner CS, Rawl SM, Moser BK, Champion VL, Scott LL, Strigo TS, Bastian L. Patients' interest in discussing cancer risk and risk management with primary care physicians. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:77-87. (Pubitemid 40431915)
11. Bao Y, Fox SA, Escarce JJ. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in the discussion of cancer screening: "between-" versus " within-" physician differences. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:950-70. (Pubitemid 46699468)
12. Price-Haywood EG, Roth KG, Shelby K, Cooper LA. Cancer risk communication with low health literacy patients: a continuing medical education program. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(Suppl 2):S126-9.
13. Davis TC, Crouch MA, Long SW, et al. Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. Fam Med. 1991;23:433-5.
14. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:27-41.
15. Sudore RL, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve care for patients with limited health literacy. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2009;16:20-29.
16. Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients' perceived involvement in care scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:29-33. (Pubitemid 20098228)
17. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-33. (Pubitemid 126433231)
18. Busija L, Pausenberger E, Haines TP, Haymes S, Buchbinder R, Osborne RH. Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:S383-412.
19. Stretcher VJ, Rosenstock JM. The Health Belief Model. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997. p. 41-59.
20. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician- patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651-61. (Pubitemid 29314682)
21. Braddock CH III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313-20. (Pubitemid 30013062)
22. Singer JD, Using SAS. PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Educ Behav Stat. 1998;24:323-55. (Pubitemid 128474255)
23. Dwamena F, Holmes-Rovner M, Gaulden CM, et al. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12, CD003267. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003267. pub2.Review.
24. Culver JO, Bowen DJ, Reynolds SE, Pinsky LE, Press N, Burke W. Breast cancer risk communication: assessment of primary care physicians by standardized patients. Genet Med. 2009;11:735-41.
25. Ling BS, Trauth JM, Fine MJ, et al. Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care? Med Care. 2008;46:S23-9.
26. Katz ML, Broder-Oldach B, Fisher JL, et al. Patient-provider discussions about colorectal cancer screening: who initiates elements of informed decision making? J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1135-41.
27. Zapka JM, Klabunde CN, Arora NK, Yuan G, Smith JL, Kobrin SC. Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:509-21.
28. Mosen DM, Feldstein AC, Perrin NA, et al. More comprehensive discussion of CRC screening associated with higher screening. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:265-71.
29. Kelly PA, Haidet P. Physician overestimation of patient literacy: a potential source of health care disparities. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:119-22. (Pubitemid 46366610)
30. Peterson NB, Dwyer KA, Mulvaney SA, Dietrich MS, Rothman RL. The influence of health literacy on colorectal cancer screening knowledge, beliefs and behavior. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99:1105-12. (Pubitemid 47614581)
31. Miller DP Jr, Brownlee CD, McCoy TP, Pignone MP. The effect of health literacy on knowledge and receipt of colorectal cancer screening: a survey study. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:16.
32. Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R, et al. Community Preventive Services Task Force. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:97-118.
33. Wu S, Crespi CM, Wong WK. Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:869-80.
34. Hade EM, Murray DM, Pennell ML, et al. Intraclass correlation estimates for cancer screening outcomes: estimates and applications in the design of group-randomized cancer screeningstudies. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:97-103.
35. Rethans JJ, Gorter S, Bokken L, Morrison L. Unannounced standardised patients in real practice: a systematic literature review. Med Educ. 2007;41:537-49. (Pubitemid 46789575)
36. Luck J, Peabody JW. Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordings. BMJ. 2002;325:679.
37. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283:1715-22. (Pubitemid 30196212)
38. Srinivasan M, Franks P, Meredith LS, Fiscella K, Epstein RM, Kravitz RL. Connoisseurs of care? Unannounced standardized patients' ratings of physicians. Med Care. 2006;44:1092-8. (Pubitemid 44808670)
39. Frank P, Friscella K, Shiedls CG, et al. Are patient ratings of their physicians related to health outcomes? Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:229-34.