Male accessory gland substances from Aedes albopictus affect the locomotor activity of Aedes aegypti females

Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

Volumn 108, Issue , 2013, Pages 18-25

  Lima Camara, Tamara Nunes ^a   Codeço, Claudia Torres ^a   Honório, Nildimar Alves ^a   Bruno, Rafaela Vieira ^a,b   Peixoto, Alexandre Afranio ^a,b   Lounibos, Leon Philip ^c  

^a INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

^b Ministério de Ciência Tecnologia e Inovação Salvador   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aedes aegypti; Aedes albopictus; cross; laboratory; locomotor activity; mating

Indexed keywords

AEDES; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; DENGUE; DISEASE CARRIER; FEMALE; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TRANSMISSION;

AEDES; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; DENGUE; FEMALE; INSECT VECTORS; INSEMINATION; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84904403256     PISSN: 00740276     EISSN: 16788060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/0074-0276130381     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bargielowski IE, Lounibos LP, Carrasquilla MC 2013. Evolution of resistance to satyrization through reproductive character displacement in populations of invasive dengue vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 2888-2892.
2. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, Drake JM, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, Sankoh O, Myers MF, George DB, Jaenisch T, Wint GR, Simmons CP, Scott TW, Farrar JJ, Hay SI 2013. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496: 504-507.
3. Braks MAH, Honório NA, Lounibos LP, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R, Ju-liano SA 2004. Interspecific competition between two invasive species of container mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), in Brazil. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97: 130-139.
4. Braks MAH, Honório NA, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R, Juliano SA, Lounibos LP 2003. Convergent habitat segregation of Aedes ae-gypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in southeastern Brazil and Florida. J Med Entomol 40: 785-794.
5. Brito LP, Linss JG, Lima-Camara TN, Belinato TA, Peixoto AA, Lima JB, Valle D, Martins AJ 2013. Assessing the effects of Ae-des aegypti kdr mutations on pyrethroid resistance and its fitness cost. PLoS ONE 8: e60878.
6. Clements AN 1999. Adult circadian rhythms. In AN Clements, The biology of mosquitoes. Sensory reception and behaviour, Vol. 2, CABI publishing, London, p. 206-238.
7. Consoli RAGB, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R 1994. Principais mosquitos de importância sanitária no Brasil, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, 225 pp.
8. Craig Jr GB 1967. Mosquitoes: female monogamy induced by male accessory gland substance. Science 156: 1499-1501.
9. Daugherty MP, Alto BW, Juliano SA 2000. Invertebrate carcasses as a resource for competing Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Dip-tera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 37: 364-372.
10. de Castro MG, Nogueira RMR, Schatzmayr HG, Miagostovich MP, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R 2004. Dengue virus detection by using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in saliva and progeny of experimentally infected Aedes albopictus from Bra-zil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 99: 809-814.
11. Degallier N, Teixeira JMS, Soares SS, Pereira RD, Pinto SCF, Chaib AJM, Vasconcelos PF, Oliveira E 2003. Aedes albopictus may not be vector of dengue virus in human epidemics in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 37: 386-387.
12. Figueiredo ML, Gomes AC, Amarilla AA, Leandro AS, Orrico AS, Araujo RF, Castro JSM, Durigon EL, Aquino VH, Figueiredo LT 2010. Mosquitoes infected with dengue viruses in Brazil. Virol J 7: 152.
13. Gentile C, Rivas GB, Meireles-Filho AC, Lima JB, Peixoto AA 2009. Circadian expression of clock genes in two mosquito disease vec-tors: cry2 is different. J Biol Rhythms 24: 444-451.
14. Gillott C 2003. Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. Annu Rev Entomol 48: 163-184.
15. Gubler DJ, Bhattacharya NC 1972. Swarming and mating of Aedes (S.) albopictus in nature. Mosq News 32: 219-223.
16. Harper JP, Paulson SL 1994. Reproductive isolation between Florida strains of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 10: 88-92.
17. Hartberg WK 1971. Observations on the mating behaviour of Aedes aegypti in nature. Bull World Health Organ 45: 847-850.
18. Honório N, Castro MG, Barros FS, Magalhães MA, Sabroza PC 2009. The spatial distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in a transition zone, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 25: 1203-1214.
19. Jones MDR 1981. The programming of circadiam flight activity in relation to mating and the gonotrophia cycle in the mosquito Aedes Aegypti. Physiol Entomol 6: 307-313.
20. Jones MDR, Gubbins SJ 1977. Modification of circadian flight activity in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae after insemination. Nature 268: 731-732.
21. Jones MDR, Gubbins SJ 1978. Changes in the circadian flight activity of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae in relation to insemination, feeding and oviposition. Physiol Entomol 3: 213-220.
22. Juliano SA 1998. Species introduction and replacement among mos-quitoes: interspecific resource competition or apparent competi-tion? Ecology 79: 255-268.
23. Kaplan L, Kendell D, Robertson D, Livdahl T, Katchikian C 2010. Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Bermuda: extinction, in-vasion and extinction. Biol Invasions 12: 3277-3288.
24. Klowden MJ 1996. Endogenous factors regulating mosquito host-seeking behaviour. Ciba Found Symp 200: 212-225.
25. Klowden MJ 1999. The check is in the male: male mosquitoes affect female physiology and behavior. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 15: 213-220.
26. Leahy MG, Craig Jr GB 1965. Accessory gland substance as a stimu-lant for oviposition in Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Mosq News 25: 448-452.
27. Leahy MG, Craig Jr GB 1967. Barriers to hybridization between Ae-des aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Evolution 21: 41-58.
28. Lee HL, Aramu M, Nazni WA, Selvi S, Vasan S 2009. No evidence for successful interspecific cross-mating of transgenic Aedes ae-gypti (L.) and wild type Aedes albopictus Skuse. Trop Biomed 26: 312-319.
29. Lima-Camara TN 2010. Activity patterns of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) under natural and artificial con-ditions. Oecologia Australis 14: 737-744.
30. Lima-Camara TN, Bruno RV, Luz PM, Castro MG, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R, Sorgine MH, Peixoto AA 2011. Dengue infection increases the locomotor activity of Aedes aegypti females. PLoS ONE 6: e17690.
31. Lima-Camara TN, Honório NA, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R 2006. Frequência e distribuição espacial de Aedes aegypti e Aedes al-bopictus (Diptera:Culicidae) no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cad Sau-de Publica 22: 2079-2084.
32. Lounibos LP 2002. Invasions by insect vectors of human disease. Annu Rev Entomol 47: 233-266.
33. Lounibos LP 2007. Competitive displacement and reduction. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 23: 276-282.
34. Lourenço-de-Oliveira R, Vazeille M, de Filippis AMB, Failloux AB 2003. Large genetic differentiation and low variation in vector competence for dengue and yellow fever viruses of Aedes al-bopictus from Brazil, the United States and the Cayman Islands. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69: 105-114.
35. Miller BR, Ballinger ME 1988. Aedes albopictus mosquitoes intro-duced into Brazil: vector competence for yellow fever and dengue viruses. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 82: 476-477.
36. Nasci RS, Hare SG, Willis FS 1989. Interspecific mating between Louisiana strains of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti in the field and laboratory. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 5: 416-421.
37. Nazni WA, Lee HL, Dayang HA, Azahari AH 2009. Cross-mating between Malaysian strains of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopic-tus in the laboratory. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 40: 40-46.
38. R Core Team 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical com-puting, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available from: R-project.org/.
39. Rey JR, Nishimura N, Wagner B, Braks MA, O’Connell SM, Louni-bos LP 2006. Habitat segregation of mosquito arbovirus vectors in south Florida. J Med Entomol 43: 1134-1141.
40. Ribeiro JM 1988. Can satyrs control pests and vectors? J Med Entomol 25: 431-440.
41. Ribeiro JMC, Spielman A 1986. The satyr effect: a model predicting parapatry and species extinction. Am Nat 128: 513-528.
42. Rowland M 1989. Changes in the circadian flight activity of the mosquito Anopheles stephensi associated with insemination, blood-feeding, oviposition and nocturnal light intensity. Physiol Entomol 14: 77-84.
43. Serufo JC, de Oca HM, Tavares VA, Souza AM, Rosa RV, Jamal MC, Lemos JR, Oliveira MA, Nogueira RMR, Schatzmayr HG 1993. Isolation of dengue virus type 1 from larvae of Aedes albopictus in Campos Altos city, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 88: 503-504.
44. Shutt B, Stables L, Aboagye-Antwi F, Moran J, Tripet F 2010. Male accessory gland proteins induce female monogamy in anopheline mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol 24: 91-94.
45. Sirot LK, Poulson RL, McKenna MC, Girnary H, Wolfner MF, Harrington LC 2008. Identity and transfer of male reproductive gland proteins of the dengue vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti: potential tools for control of female feeding and reproduction. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 38: 176-189.
46. Tripet F, Lounibos LP, Robbins D, Moran J, Nishimura N, Blosser EM 2011. Competitive reduction by satyrization? Evidence for interspecific mating in nature and asymmetric reproductive competition between invasive mosquito vectors. Am J Trop Med Hyg 85: 265-270.
47. Williams CB 1937. The use of logarithms in the interpretation of cer-tain entomological problems. Ann Appl Biol 24: 404-414.