Identifying Predictors of Unacceptable Pain at Office Hysteroscopy

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 586-591

  de Freitas Fonseca, Márlon ^a   Sessa, Felipe V ^a   Resende, José Anacleto D ^a,b   Guerra, Camilla Gabriely S ^a   Andrade, Claudio M ^c   Crispi, Claudio P ^c  

^a INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

^b HOSPITAL FEDERAL DA LAGOA   (Brazil)

^c Centro de Vídeo endoscopia São Paulo CEVESP Barra   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Confounding; Diagnostic hysteroscopy; Menstrual cramps; Predictors of pain; Preemptive analgesia

Indexed keywords

ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CURETTAGE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DYSMENORRHEA; DYSPAREUNIA; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ENDOMETRIAL THICKNESS; ENDOMETRIUM BIOPSY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; HYSTEROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOMA; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME; POLYP; PREDICTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING; VAGINAL DELIVERY; VERBAL RATING SCALE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AMBULATORY SURGERY; CANADA; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CANADA; DYSMENORRHEA; DYSPAREUNIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSCOPY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904399536     PISSN: 15534650     EISSN: 15534669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.118     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cicinelli E. Hysteroscopy without anesthesia: review of recent literature [review]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010, 17:703-708.
2. Floris S., Piras B., Orrú M., et al. Efficacy of intravenous tramadol treatment for reducing pain during office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2007, 87:147-151.
3. Rullo S., Sorrenti G., Marziali M., Ermini B., Sesti F., Piccione E. Office hysteroscopy: comparison of 2.7- and 4-mm hysteroscopes for acceptability, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy. J Reprod Med 2005, 50:45-48.
4. Cicinelli E., Rossi A.C., Marinaccio M., Matteo M., Saliani N., Tinelli R. Predictive factors for pain experienced at office fluid minihysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007, 14:485-488.
5. van Dongen H., de Kroon C.D., van den Tillaart S.A., Louwé L.A., Trimbos-Kemper G.C., Jansen F.W. A randomised comparison of vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy and saline infusion sonography: a patient compliance study. BJOG 2008, 115:1232-1237.
6. Carta G., Palermo P., Marinangeli F., et al. Waiting time and pain during office hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012, 19:360-364.
7. Angioli R., Cicco Nardone C.D., Plotti F., et al. The use of music to reduce anxiety during office hysteroscopy: a prospective randomized trial. JMinim Invasive Gynecol 2014, 21:454-459.
8. Campbell F., Collett B.J. Chronic pelvic pain. Br J Anaesth 1994, 73:571-573.
9. Nelson H.D. Menopause. Lancet 2008, 371:760-770.
10. Kabli N., Tulandi T. A randomized trial of outpatient hysteroscopy with and without intrauterine anesthesia. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008, 15:308-310.
11. Carvalho D.S., Kowacs P.A. Avaliação da intensidade de dor [in Portuguese]. Migrâneas Cefaléias 2006, 9:164-168.
12. Breivik H., Borchgrevink P.C., Allen S.M., et al. Assessment of pain [review]. Br J Anaesth 2008, 101:17-24.
13. Pluchino N., Ninni F., Angioni S., et al. Office vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile women: effects of gynecologist experience, instrument size, and distention medium on patient discomfort. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010, 17:344-350.
14. Bettocchi S., Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997, 4:255-258.
15. Cicinelli E., Parisi C., Galantino P., Pinto V., Barba B., Schonauer S. Reliability, feasibility, and safety of minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach: experience with 6,000 cases. Fertil Steril 2003, 80:199-202.
16. Evangelista A., Oliveira M.A., Crispi C.P., Lamblet M.F., Raymundo T.S., Santos L.C. Diagnostic hysteroscopy using liquid distention medium: comparison of pain with warmed saline solution vs room-temperature saline solution. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011, 18:104-107.
17. De Freitas Fonseca M., Andrade C.M., de Mello M.J., Crispi C.P. Effect of temperature on fluidity of irrigation fluids. Br J Anaesth 2011, 106:51-56.
18. Papanikolaou P.N., Christidi G.D., Ioannidis J.P. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies. CMAJ 2006, 174:635-641.
19. Romani F., Guido M., Morciano A., et al. The use of different size-hysteroscope in office hysteroscopy: our experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013, 288:1355-1359.
20. Janse J.A., Pattij T.O., Eijkemans M.J., Broekmans F.J., Veersema S., Schreuder H.W. Learning curve of hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization microinserts in 15 gynecologists in the Netherlands. Fertil Steril 2013, 100:755-760.
21. Di Spiezio Sardo A., Taylor A., Tsirkas P., Mastrogamvrakis G., Sharma M., Magos A. Hysteroscopy: a technique for all? Analysis of 5,000 outpatient hysteroscopies. Fertil Steril 2008, 89:438-443.