Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: A matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 603-609

  Barnajian, M ^a   Pettet, D ^a   Kazi, E ^a   Foppa, C ^a   Bergamaschi, R ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Circumferential resection margin; Laparoscopic surgery; Learning curve; Rectal cancer; Total mesorectal excision

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS STENOSIS; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; BODY MASS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; DIET; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FLATULENCE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; ILEUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; PELVIS ABSCESS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM RESECTION; REOPERATION; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; URINE RETENTION; ANAL CANAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING CURVE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING CURVE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84904383522     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12634     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lindsey I. Who should treat rectal cancer and how? Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 1439-40.
2. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986; 28: 1479-82.
3. Quirke P, Dixon MF. The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorect Dis 1988; 3: 127-31.
4. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1729-34.
5. Bhlat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM. Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 349-55.
6. Monson JRT, Fleming FJ, Iannuzzi JC. Colorectal surgery training and patient safety: dissonance in an era of quality reporting. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 785-7.
7. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986; 2: 996-9.
8. Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JDI, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1521-5.
9. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 1961; 178: 261-6.
10. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1217-20.
11. Edge SB, Byrd RD, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition. New York: Springer, 2010.
12. Kim YW, Lee HM, Kim NK, Min BS, Lee KY. The learning curve for robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012; 22: 400-5.
13. Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, Díaz-Pavón JM, de la Portilla de Juan F, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28: 815-21.
14. Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY et al. Factors influencing pathologic results after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: analysis of consecutive 100 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 721-8.
15. Chern H, Chou J, Donkor C et al. Effects of obesity in rectal cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 2010: 55-60.
16. Leonard D, Penninckx F, Fieuws S et al. PROCARE, a multidisciplinary Belgian Project on Cancer of the Rectum. Factors predicting the quality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 982-8.
17. Denost Q, Quintane L, Buscail E, Martenot M, Laurent C, Rullier E. Short- and long-term impact of body mass index on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 463-9.
18. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 2013: 210-8.
19. Lin S, Jiang H-G, Yu J-R. Meta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 5214-20.
20. Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 2012: 2095-101.
21. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 3195-202.
22. Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS. Robotic vs. laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short term outcomes of a case control study. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 151-6.
23. Kim NK, Kang J. Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the role of robotic surgery from an expert's view. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2010; 26: 377-87.
24. Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS et al. The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison-open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 95-101.
25. D'Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I et al. Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 1887-95.
26. Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK et al. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26: 350-7.
27. Mirnezami AH, Mirnezami R, Venkatasubramaniam AK, Chandrakumaran K, Cecil TD, Moran BJ. Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 1084-93.
28. Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD, Paz B, Pigazzi A. Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 3168-73.
29. Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A. Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 447-51.
30. Zawadzki M, Velchuru VR, Albalawi SA, Park JJ, Marecik S, Prasad LM. Is hybrid robotic laparoscopic assistance the ideal approach for restorative rectal cancer dissection? Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 1026-32.
31. Fernandez R, Anaya DA, Li LT et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer in a veteran population. Am J Surg 2013; 206: 509-17.
32. Akmal Y, Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A. Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: is there a learning curve? Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2471-6.
33. Sng KK, Hara M, Shin JW, Yoo BE, Yang KS, Kim SH. The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3297-307.