Erratum: The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of suspected appendicitis in pregnancy: Shortened length of stay without increase in hospital charges (JAMA Surgery (2014) DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4658);The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of suspected appendicitis in pregnancy: Shortened length of stay without increase in hospital charges

JAMA Surgery

Volumn 149, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 687-693

  Fonseca, Annabelle L ^a   Schuster, Kevin M ^a   Kaplan, Lewis J ^a   Maung, Adrian A ^a   Lui, Felix Y ^a   Davis, Kimberly A ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; APPENDICITIS; APPENDIX PERFORATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS OUTCOME; FETUS WASTAGE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITAL CHARGE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; APPENDICITIS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL CHARGES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84904382642     PISSN: 21686254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1419     Document Type: Erratum

References (18)

1. Tamir IL, Bongard FS, Klein SR. Acute appendicitis in the pregnant patient. Am J Surg. 1990;160(6):571-576.
2. Andersen B, Nielsen TF. Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78(9):758-762. (Pubitemid 29486048)
3. Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, Lisboa L. Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):1027-1029. (Pubitemid 30353270)
4. Mazze RI, Källén B. Appendectomy during pregnancy: a Swedish registry study of 778 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(6):835-840.
5. Babaknia A, Parsa H,Woodruff JD. Appendicitis during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;50(1):40-44. (Pubitemid 8146716)
6. Lee SL,Walsh AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2001;136(5):556-562.
7. McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM. Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(4):534-540. (Pubitemid 47446321)
8. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG committee opinion: number 299, September 2004 (replaces No. 158, September 1995): guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(3):647-651.
9. Freeland M, King E, Safcsak K, Durham R. Diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnancy. Am J Surg. 2009;198(6):753-758.
10. Oto A, Ernst RD, Shah R, et al. Right-lower-quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis in pregnant women: evaluation with MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;234(2):445-451. (Pubitemid 40139915)
11. Vu L, Ambrose D, Vos P, Tiwari P, Rosengarten M, Wiseman S. Evaluation of MRI for the diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy when ultrasound is inconclusive. J Surg Res. 2009;156(1):145-149.
12. Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, Ngo L, Rofsky NM. MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology. 2006;238(3):891-899. (Pubitemid 43289919)
13. Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J. MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(3):671-675. (Pubitemid 39145313)
14. Masselli G, Picarelli A, Di Tola M, et al. Celiac disease: evaluationwith dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2010;256(3):783-790.
15. Israel GM, Malguria N, McCarthy S, Copel J, Weinreb J. MRI vs. ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(2):428-433.
16. Masselli G, Brunelli R, Casciani E, et al. Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: MR imaging as a valuable adjunct to ultrasound? Abdom Imaging. 2011;36(5):596-603.
17. Ueberrueck T, Koch A, Meyer L, Hinkel M, Gastinger I. Ninety-four appendectomies for suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy. World J Surg. 2004;28(5):508-511. (Pubitemid 38668485)
18. Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiarda BM, Wiezer MJ, et al OPTIMAP Study Group. Comparison of imaging strategies with conditional contrast-enhanced CT and unenhanced MR imaging in patients suspected of having appendicitis: a multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology. 2013;268(1):135-143.