Perforated Intraperitoneal Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices: Diagnosis, Management, and Clinical Outcomes

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 596-601

  Kho, Kimberly A ^a   Chamsy, Dina J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Intra abdominal; Intraperitoneal; Laparoscopy; Missing IUD; Perforated

Indexed keywords

COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ABSCESS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FISTULA; HUMAN; HYSTEROSCOPY; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LEVONORGESTREL RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERITONEAL CAVITY; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; UTERUS PERFORATION; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; FACTUAL DATABASE; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE MIGRATION; RECTAL FISTULA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TISSUE ADHESIONS; UTERINE DISEASES; UTERINE PERFORATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSCOPY; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE MIGRATION; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, COPPER; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, MEDICATED; LAPAROSCOPY; RECTAL FISTULA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE ADHESIONS; UTERINE DISEASES; UTERINE PERFORATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904364124     PISSN: 15534650     EISSN: 15534669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.123     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. United Nations. World contraceptive use 2011 [Internet]. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations. 2011. Available at . http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2011/contraceptive2011.htm.
2. Mosher W.D., Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008. Vital Health Stat 2010, 23:1-44.
3. Xu X., Macaluso M., Ouyang L., Kulczycki A., Grosse S.D. Revival of the intrauterine device: increased insertions among US women with employer-sponsored insurance, 2002-2008. Contraception 2012, 85:155-159.
4. Marchi N.M., Castro S., Hidalgo M.M., et al. Management of missing strings in users of intrauterine contraceptives. Contraception 2012, 86:354-358.
5. Chi I., Feldblum P.J., Rogers S.M. IUD-related uterine perforation: an epidemiologic analysis of a rare event using an international dataset. Contracept Deliv Syst 1984, 5:123-130.
6. Caliskan E., Ozturk N., Dilbaz B.O., Dilbaz S. Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003, 8:150-155.
7. Andersson K., Ryde-Blomqvist E., Lindell K., Odlind V., Milsom I. Perforations with intrauterine devices: report from a Swedish survey. Contraception 1998, 57:251-255.
8. Turok D.K., Gurtcheff S.E., Gibson K., Handley E., Simonsen S., Murphy P.A. Operative management of intrauterine device complications: a case series report. Contraception 2010, 82:354-357.
9. Gill R.S., Mok D., Hudson M., Shi X., Birch D.W., Karmali S. Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review. Contraception 2012, 85:15-18.
10. Banerjee J., Jeelani R., Berman J.M., Diamond M.P. Missing IUD and utilization of fluoroscopy for management: a case report. Contraception 2012, 86:285-287.
11. Callen P.W. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000, Saunders, Philadelphia, PA. 4th Ed.
12. Heartwell S.F., Schlesselman S. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 1983, 61:31-36.
13. Harrison-Woolrych M., Ashton J., Coulter D. Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported?. Contraception 2003, 67:53-56.
14. Zakin D., Stern W.Z., Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I: Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1981, 36:335-353.
15. Braaten K.P., Benson C.B., Maurer R., Goldberg A.B. Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2011, 118:1014-1020.
16. Katz V., Lentz G.M., Lobo R.A., Gershenon D.M. Comprehensive Gynecology 2007, Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA. 5th Ed.
17. Fauconnier A., Dubuisson J.B., Foulot H., et al. Mobile uterine retroversion is associated with dyspareunia and dysmenorrhea in an unselected population of women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006, 127:252-256.
18. Markovitch O., Klein Z., Gidoni Y., Holzinger M., Beyth Y. Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory?. Contraception 2002, 66:105-108.
19. Moschos E., Twickler D.M. Does the type of intrauterine device affect conspicuity on 2D and 3D ultrasound?. Am J Roentgenol 2011, 196:1439-1443.
20. Moschos E., Twickler D.M. Intrauterine devices in early pregnancy: findings on ultrasound and clinical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011, 204:427.e1-427.e6.
21. Adoni A., Ben Chetrit A. The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation. Contraception 1991, 43:77-81.
22. Heinberg E.M., McCoy T.W., Pasic R. The perforated intrauterine device: endoscopic retrieval. JSLS 2008, 12:97-100.
23. Nitke S., Rabinerson D., Dekel A., Sheiner E., Kaplan B., Hackmon R. Lost levonorgestrel IUD: diagnosis and therapy. Contraception 2004, 69:289-293.
24. Brooks P.G., Berci G., Lawrence A., Slipyan P., Wade M.E. Removal of intra-abdominal intrauterine contraceptive devices through a peritoneoscope with the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy to aid localization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972, 113:104-106.
25. Vasquez P., Schreiber C. The missing IUD. Contraception 2010, 82:126-128.