Abdominal closure reinforcement by using polypropylene mesh functionalized with poly-ε-caprolactone nanofibers and growth factors for prevention of incisional hernia formation

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 3263-3277

  Plencner, Martin ^a,b   East, Barbora ^a   Tonar, Zbyněk ^a   Otáhal, Martin ^a   Prosecká, Eva ^a,b   Rampichová, Michala ^b,c   Krejčí, Tomáš ^a   Litvinec, Andrej ^b,d   Buzgo, Matej ^b,c   Míčková, Andrea ^a,b,c   Nečas, Alois ^a   Hoch, Jiří ^e   Amler, Evžen ^a,b,c  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Czech Republic)

^c CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^d INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Growth factors; Hernia regeneration; In vivo; Nanofibers; Surgical mesh

Indexed keywords

GROWTH FACTOR; NANOFIBER; NANOMESH; POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYPROPYLENE; POLYESTER; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HERNIOPLASTY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INCISIONAL HERNIA; MATERIAL COATING; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STEREOMETRY; SURGICAL MESH; TENSILE STRENGTH; 3T3 CELL LINE; ABDOMEN; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMISTRY; CYTOCHEMISTRY; DEVICES; DRUG EFFECTS; HERNIA; MOUSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RABBIT; SURGERY; TISSUE REGENERATION; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND HEALING;

3T3 CELLS; ABDOMEN; ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; HERNIA; HISTOCYTOCHEMISTRY; INTERCELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MICE; NANOFIBERS; POLYESTERS; POLYPROPYLENES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RABBITS; SURGICAL MESH; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84904359963     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S63095     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Paul A, Korenkov M, Peters S, Köhler L, Fischer S, Troidl H. Unacceptable results of the mayo procedure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias. Eur J Surg. 1998;164:361-367.
2. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578-585.
3. Kingsnorth A. Hernia surgery: from guidelines to clinical practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91:273-279.
4. Vrijland WW, Bonthuis F, Steyerberg EW, Marquet RL, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ. Peritoneal adhesions to prosthetic materials: choice of mesh for incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:960-963.
5. Jacob BP, Hogle NJ, Durak E, Kim T, Fowler DL. Tissue ingrowth and bowel adhesion formation in an animal comparative study: polypropylene versus Proceed versus Parietex Composite. Surg Endosc. 2007;21: 629-633.
6. Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW. Entero-colocutaneous fistula: a late consequence of polypropylene mesh abdominal wall repair: case report and review of the literature. Hernia. 2002;6:144-147.
7. Jezupors A, Mihelsons M. The analysis of infection after polypropylene mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia. World J Surg. 2006;30: 2270-2278.
8. Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL, Luchette FA. A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg. 2011;253:16-26.
9. Franz MG. The biology of hernias and the abdominal wall. Hernia. 2006;10:462-471.
10. Binnebösel M, von Trotha KT, Jansen PL, Conze J, Neumann UP, Junge K. Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery. Semin Immunopathol. 2011;33:235-243.
11. Voskerician G, Jin J, White MF, Williams CP, Rosen MJ. Effect of biomaterial design criteria on the performance of surgical meshes for abdominal hernia repair: a pre-clinical evaluation in a chronic rat model. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:1989-1995.
12. Cobb WS, Peindl RM, Zerey M, Carbonell AM, Heniford BT. Mesh terminology 101. Hernia. 2009;13:1-6.
13. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B. Modified classification of surgical meshes for hernia repair based on the analyses of 1,000 explanted meshes. Hernia. 2012;16:251-258.
14. Coda A, Lamberti R, Martorana S. Classification of prosthetics used in hernia repair based on weight and biomaterial. Hernia. 2012;16:9-20.
15. Kim SH, Turnbull J, Guimond S. Extracellular matrix and cell signal-ling: the dynamic cooperation of integrin, proteoglycan and growth factor receptor. J Endocrinol. 2011;209:139-151.
16. Ma Z, Kotaki M, Inai R, Ramakrishna S. Potential of nanofiber matrix as tissue-engineering scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:101-109.
17. Agarwal S, Wendorff JH, Greiner A. Use of electrospinning technique for biomedical applications. Polymer. 2008;49:5603-5621.
18. Lukas D, Sarkar A, Martinova L, et al. Physical principles of electro-spinning (electrospinning as a nano-scale technology of the twenty-first century). Text Prog. 2009;41:1-83.
19. Bhardway N, Kundu SC. Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28:325-347.
20. Grafahrend D, Heffels KH, Beer MV, et al. Degradable polyester scaffolds with controlled surface chemistry combining minimal protein adsorption with specific bioactivation. Nat Mater. 2011;10:67-73.
21. Jakubova R, Mickova A, Buzgo M, et al. Immobilization of thrombocytes on PCL nanofibres enhances chondrocyte proliferation in vitro. Cell Prolif. 2002;44:183-191.
22. Hutmacher DW, Schantz T, Zein I, Ng KW, Teoh SH, Tan KC. Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:203-216.
23. Kweon H, Yoo MK, Park IK, et al. A novel degradable polycaprolactone networks for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24:801-808.
24. Thapa A, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM. Polymers with nano-dimensional surface features enhance bladder smooth muscle cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67:1374-1383.
25. Venugopal J, Ramakrishna S. Biocompatible nanofiber matrices for the engineering of a dermal substitute for skin regeneration. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:847-854.
26. Chen M, Patra PK, Warner SB, Bhowmick S. Role of fiber diameter in adhesion and proliferation of NIH 3T3 fibroblast on electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:579-587.
27. Williamson MR, Adams EF, Coombes AF. Gravity spun polycaprolactone fibres for soft tissue engineering: interaction with fibroblasts and myoblasts in cell culture. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1019-1026.
28. Rampichová M, Chvojka J, Buzgo M, et al. Elastic three-dimensional poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibre scaffold enhances migration, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2012;46:23-37.
29. Filová E, Rampichová M, Litvinec A, et al. A cell-free nanofiber composite scaffold regenerated osteochondral defects in miniature pigs. Int J Pharm. 2013;447:139-149.
30. Mickova A, Buzgo M, Benada O, et al. Core/shell nanofibers with embedded liposomes as a drug delivery system. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:952-962.
31. Mouton PR. Principles and Practices of Unbiased Stereology: An Introduction for Bioscientists. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2002.
32. Kocová J. Overall staining of connective tissue and the muscular layer of vessels. Folia Morphol (Praha). 1970;18:293-295.
33. Gundersen HJ. Estimators of the number of objects per area unbiased by edge effects. Microsc Acta. 1978;81:107-117.
34. Ebersole GC, Buettmann EG, Macewan MR, et al. Development of novel electrospun absorbable polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds for hernia repair applications. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2717-2728.
35. Hunt TK, Knighton DR, Thakral KK, Goodson WH, Andrews WS. Studies on inflammation and wound healing: angiogenesis and collagen synthesis stimulated in vivo by resident and activated wound macrophages. Surgery. 1984;96:48-54.
36. Mustoe TA, Pierce GF, Thomason A, Gramates P, Sporn MB, Deuel TF. Accelerated healing of incisional wounds in rats induced by transforming growth factor-beta. Science. 1987;237:1333-1336.
37. Yaeger PC, Masi TL, de Ortiz JL, Binette F, Tubo R, McPherson JM. Synergistic action of transforming growth factor-β and insulin-like growth factor-I induces expression of type II collagen and aggrecan genes in adult human articular chondrocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1997;237: 318-325.
38. Filová E, Jelinek F, Handl M, et al. Novel composite hyaluronan/type I collagen/fibrin scaffold enhances repair of osteochondral defect in rabbit knee. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;87:415-424.
39. Deeken CR, Abdo MS, Frisella MM, Matthews BD. Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1541-1552.
40. Melman L, Jenkins ED, Hamilton NA, et al. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of a novel macroporous polytetrafluoroethylene knit mesh compared to lightweight and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2011;15: 423-431.
41. Schumpelick V, Klinge U, Junge K, Stumpf M. Incisional abdominal hernia: the open mesh repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389:1-5.
42. Junge K, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, et al. Influence of mesh materials on collagen deposition in a rat model. J Invest Surg. 2002;15:319-328.
43. Shalumon KT, Binulal NS, Deepthy M, Jayakumar R, Manzoor K, Nair SV. Preparation, characterization and cell attachment studies of electrospun multi-scale poly(caprolactone) fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Macromol Sci A. 2011;48:21-30.
44. Santos MI, Tuzlakoglu K, Fuchs S, et al. Endothelial cell colonization and angiogenic potential of combined nano and micro-fibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29:4306-4313.