The Chemistry Scoring Index (CSI): A hazard-based scoring and ranking tool for chemicals and products used in the oil and gas industry

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 3993-4009

  Verslycke, Tim ^a   Reid, Kim ^a   Bowers, Teresa ^a   Thakali, Sagar ^a   Lewis, Ari ^a   Sanders, Johnny ^b   Tuck, Denise ^b  

^a Halliburton Energy Services Inc ^*  (United States)

^b HALLIBURTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Green chemistry; Hazard assessment; Hydraulic fracturing; Product evaluation; Product stewardship

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; INDUSTRIAL POLICY; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84904345892     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su6073993     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. OSPAR. Final Declaration of the Ministerial Meetings of the Oslo and Paris Commissions. In Proceedings of the Oslo and Paris Conventions for the Prevention of Marine Pollution, Paris, France, 21-22 September 1992.
2. OSPAR. OSPAR Decision 2000/2 on a Harmonised Mandatory Control System for the Use and Reduction of the Discharge of Offshore Chemicals. OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment in the North-East Atlantic. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the OSPAR Commission, Copenhagen, Denmark, 26-30 June 2000.
3. European Commission (EC). EC Regulation No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. 2006.
4. Australian Government. Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989; Office of Parliamentary Counsel: Canberra, Australia, 1989; p. 236.
5. Clean Production Action (CPA). The Green Screen for Safer Chemicals, Version 1.2.; CPA: Somerville, MA, USA, 2013; p. 47.
6. Davis, G.A.; Swanson, M.; Jones, S. Comparative evaluation of chemical ranking and scoring methodologies. Prepared by University of Tennessee Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies. EPA Order No. 3N-3545-NAEX. 1994. Available online: http://isse.utk.edu/ ccp/pubs/pdfs/CECRSM.pdf; p. 61 (accessed on 2 April 2014).
7. European Parliament Council of the European Communities (EP/CEC). EC Regulation No. 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community ecolabel award scheme. Off. J. Eur. Comm. L 2000, 237, 1-12.
8. McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC (MBDC). The Cradle to Cradle Design Protocol. 2009. Available online: http://www.mbdc.com/ (accessed on 2 April 2014).
9. Saling, P.; Kicherer, A.; Dittrich-Kramer, B.; Wittlinger, R.; Zombik, W.; Schmidt, I.; Schrott, W.; Schmidt, S. Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF: The Method. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2002, 7, 203-218.
10. Swanson, M.B.; Socha, A.C. Chemical Ranking and Scoring. Guidelines for Relative Assessments of Chemicals; SETAC Press: Pensacola, FL, USA, 1997.
11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). DfE Master Criteria for Safer Ingredients, Version 2.1.; Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics; Design for Environment Program, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, September 2012; p. 33.
12. United Nations (UN). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), 5th Revised ed.; ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.5; United Nations: New York City, USA; Geneva, Switzerland, 2013; p. 536.
13. Snyder, E.M.; Snyder, S.A.; Giesy, J.P.; Blonde, S.A.; Hurlburt, G.K.; Summer, C.L.; Mitchell, R.R.; Bush, D.M. SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes. Part I: Structure of the scoring and ranking system. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2000, 7, 52-61.