Limits of predictability in commuting flows in the absence of data for calibration

Scientific Reports

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Yang, Yingxiang ^a   Herrera, Carlos ^b   Eagle, Nathan ^c   González, Marta C ^a,d  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904340000     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep05662     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Balcan, D. et al. Multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 21484-21489 (2009).
2. Eggo, R. M., Cauchemez, S. & Ferguson, N. M. Spatial dynamics of the 1918 influenza pandemic in england, wales and the united states. J. R. Soc. Interface 8, 233-243 (2011).
3. Viboud, C. et al. Synchrony, waves, and spatial hierarchies in the spread of influenza. Science 312, 447-451 (2006).
4. Ramasco, J. J. & Vespignani, A. Commuting and pandemic prediction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 21459-21460 (2009).
5. Ortuzar, J. & Willumsen, L. Modelling Transport (Wiley, Chichester, 1994).
6. Zipf, G. The p 1 p 2/d hypothesis: on the intercity movement of persons. Am. Sociol. Rev. 11, 677-686 (1946).
7. Wilson, A. Land-use/transport interaction models: Past and future. J. Transp. Econ. Policy. 32, 3-26 (1998).
8. Stouffer, S. Intervening opportunities: a theory relating mobility and distance. Am. Sociol. Rev. 5, 845-867 (1940).
9. Wilson, A. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling (Pion Ltd, London, 1970).
10. Wilson, A. The use of entropy maximising models, in the theory of trip distribution, mode split and route split. J. Transp. Econ. Policy. 3, 108-126 (1969).
11. Erlander, S. & Stewart, N. The Gravity Model in Transportation Analysis: Theory and Extensions (Vsp, Zeist, 1990).
12. Choukroun, J. A general framework for the development of gravity-type trip distribution models. Reg. Sci. Urban. Econ. 5, 177-202 (1975).
13. Duffus, L. N., Alfa, A. S. & Soliman, A. H. The reliability of using the gravity model for forecasting trip distribution. Transportation 14, 175-192 (1987).
14. Kirby, H. R. Theoretical requirements for calibrating gravity models. Transp. Res. 8, 97-104 (1974).
15. Anas, A. Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models. Transp. Res.: Part B: Methodological 17, 13-23 (1983).
16. Simini, F., González, M., Maritan, A. & Barabási, A. A universal model for mobility and migration patterns. Nature 484, 96-100 (2012).
17. Simini, F., Maritan, A.&Néda, Z.Human mobility inacontinuum approach. PloS one 8, e60069 (2013).
18. Stouffer, S. Intervening opportunities and competing migrants. J. Reg. Sci. 2, 1-26 (1960).
19. Lenormand, M., Huet, S., Gargiulo, F. & Deffuant, G. A universal model of commuting networks. PloS one 7, e45985 (2012).
20. Jichang, Z., Li, D. & Ke, X. Unraveling the origin of exponential law in intra-urban human mobility. Sci. Rep. 3, 10.1038/srep2983 (2013).
21. Masucci, P. A. et al. Gravity versus radiation models: On the importance of scale and heterogeneity in commuting flows. Phys. Rev. E 88 (2013).
22. Wilson, A. & Senior, M. Some relationships between entropy maximizing models, mathematical programming models, and their duals. J. Reg. Sci. 14, 207-215 (1974).
23. Bureau, U. C. https://explore.data.gov/labor-force-employment-and- earnings/lehd-origin-destination-employment-statistics-lode/zvvq-y3uj/(2012) [Online; accessed 10-June-2014].
24. Rodrigues, F. et al. Estimating disaggregated employment size from points-of-interest and census data: From mining the web to model implementation and visualization. Int. J. Adv. Intell. Sys. 6, 41-52 (2013).
25. Sui, D., Elwood, S. & Goodchild, M. Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice (Springer, Dordrecht, 2012).
26. Gould, M. et al. Next-generation digital earth: A position paper from the vespucci initiative for the advancement of geographic information science. Int. J. Spat. Data. Infrastruct. Res. 3 (2008).
27. Miller Jr, R. G. Survival Analysis, vol. 66 (Wiley, Chichester, 2011).
28. Harrell, F. E. Regression Modeling Strategies: with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis (Springer, Dordrecht, 2001).
29. Hosmer Jr, D. W., Lemeshow, S. & May, S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data, vol. 618 (Wiley, Chichester, 2011).
30. Sørensen, T. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biol. Skr. 5, 1-34 (1948).
31. Lu, X., Bengtsson, L. & Holme, P. Predictability of population displacement after the 2010 haiti earthquake. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 11576-11581 (2012).
32. Wesolowski, A. et al. Quantifying the impact of human mobility on malaria. Science 338, 267-270 (2012).
33. Bagrow, J., Wang, D. & Barabási, A. Collective response of human populations to large-scale emergencies. PloS one 6, e17680 (2011).
34. Gonzalez, M., Hidalgo, C. & Barabasi, A. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453, 779-782 (2008). (Pubitemid 351793783)
35. Song, C., Qu, Z., Blumm, N. & Barabási, A. Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science 327, 1018-1021 (2010).
36. Song, C., Koren, T., Wang, P. & Barabási, A. Modelling the scaling properties of human mobility. Nature Phys. 6, 818-823 (2010).
37. Bhaduri, B., Bright, E., Coleman, P. & Urban, M. Landscan usa: a high-resolution geospatial and temporal modeling approach for population distribution and dynamics. GeoJ. 69, 103-117 (2007). (Pubitemid 350029078)
38. Humnetlab. http://humnetlab.mit.edu/extendedradiation/(2013) [Online; accessed 10-June-2014].
39. Fienberg, S. An iterative procedure for estimation in contingency tables. Ann. Math. Stat. 41, 907-917 (1970).