A specific pilot-scale membrane hybrid treatment system for municipal wastewater treatment

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 169, Issue , 2014, Pages 52-61

  Nguyen, Dinh Duc ^a,c   Ngo, Huu Hao ^b   Kim, Sa Dong ^a   Yoon, Yong Soo ^a  

^a Dankook University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Ho Chi Minh City University of Natural Sciences   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

Internal recycling ratio; Membrane fouling; Municipal wastewater; Pilot scale hybrid treatment system; Specific energy consumption

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FLOW RATE; MEMBRANE FOULING; WATER QUALITY; EFFLUENTS; RECYCLING; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION;

CONSTANT PERMEATE FLUX; HYBRID TREATMENT; MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT; MUNICIPAL WASTEWATERS; RECYCLING RATIO; SPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION; SUBMERGED FLAT SHEET MEMBRANE; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

DISSOLVED OXYGEN; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; NITROGEN; OXYGEN; PHOSPHORUS; WASTE WATER; WATER POLLUTANT;

BIOFOULING; BIOREACTOR; EFFLUENT; MEMBRANE; RECYCLING; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT; ENERGY CONSERVATION;

ALKALINITY; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY COST; FILTRATION; FLAT SHEET MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; FLOW RATE; HYBRID; MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MICROFILTRATION; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATING HANGING MEDIA BIOREACTOR; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; TEMPERATURE; TURBIDITY; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOREACTOR; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMISTRY; CITY; COST; ECONOMICS; ELECTRICITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PERMEABILITY; PH; PILOT STUDY; PRESSURE; PROCEDURES; TIME; WASTE WATER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTANT; EFFLUENT; EQUALIZING REACTOR; SHEET MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT;

BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOREACTORS; CITIES; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; NITROGEN; OXYGEN; PERMEABILITY; PHOSPHORUS; PILOT PROJECTS; PRESSURE; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WASTE WATER; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84904330694     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.087     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ahmad R.T., Nguyen T.V., Shim W.G., Vigneswaran S., Moon H., Kandasamy J. Effluent organic matter removal by Purolite®A500PS: experimental performance and mathematical model. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 98:46-54.
2. Chen S., Sun D., Chung J.-S. Simultaneous removal of COD and ammonium from landfill leachate using an anaerobic-aerobic moving-bed biofilm reactor system. Waste Manage. (Oxford) 2008, 28:339-346.
3. Chundong J., Zhi X., Qingzhi F., Haiyan G. Treatment of synthetic wastewater in a pre-denitrification biofilm reactor packed with polyurethane media. Energy Procedia 2012, 16(Part C(0)):1642-1649.
4. Cresson R., Carrère H., Delgenès J.P., Bernet N. Biofilm formation during the start-up period of an anaerobic biofilm reactor-Impact of nutrient complementation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 30(1):55-62.
5. Defrance L., Jaffrin M.Y., Gupta B., Paullier P., Geaugey V. Contribution of various constituents of activated sludge to membrane bioreactor fouling. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 73:105-112.
6. Di Trapani D., Christensso M., Odegaard H. Hybrid activated sludge/biofilm process for the treatment of municipal wastewater in a cold climate region: a case study. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63:1121-1129.
7. Ding D., Feng C., Jin Y., Hao C., Zhao Y., Suemura T. Domestic sewage treatment in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) with an intelligent controlling system. Desalination 2011, 276:260-265.
8. Fan J., Tao T., Zhang J., You G.-L. Performance evaluation of a modified anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2/O) process treating low strength wastewater. Desalination 2009, 249:822-827.
9. Feng S., Zhang N., Liu H., Du X., Liu Y., Lin H. The effect of COD/N ratio on process performance and membrane fouling in a submerged bioreactor. Desalination 2012, 285:232-238.
10. Gil J.A., Túa L., Rueda A., Montaño B., Rodríguez M., Prats D. Monitoring and analysis of the energy cost of an MBR. Desalination 2010, 250:997-1001.
11. Gnirss, R., Lüdicke, C., Lesjean, B., Stuber, J., Kraume, M. 2009. MBR Demonstration Plant: EBPR with Post Denitrification in Berlin Margaretenhöhe. Book of Proceedings of final MBR Network workshop, 31 March-1 April, Berlin, Germany.
12. Halling-Sørensen B., Jørgensen S.E. The Removal of Nitrogen Compounds from Wastewater 1993, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
13. Hu Y., Wang X.C., Zhang Y., Li Y., Chen H., Jin P. Characteristics of an A2O-MBR system for reclaimed water production under constant flux at low TMP. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 431:156-162.
14. Jou C.-J.G., Huang G.-C. A pilot study for oil refinery wastewater treatment using a fixed-film bioreactor. Adv. Environ. Res. 2003, 7:463-469.
15. Judd, S., Judd, C., 2010. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment, second ed. Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp. 536. (Judd, S., Judd, C. (Eds.)).
16. Jurecska L., Barkács K., Kiss É., Gyulai G., Felföldi T., Töro B., Kovács R., Záray G. Intensification of wastewater treatment with polymer fiber-based biofilm carriers. Microchem. J. 2013, 107:108-114.
17. Kim H.-s., Gellner J.W., Boltz J.P., Freudenberg R.G., Gunsch C.K., Schuler A.J. Effects of integrated fixed film activated sludge media on activated sludge settling in biological nutrient removal systems. Water Res. 2010, 44:1553-1561.
18. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:17-53.
19. Levstek M., Plazl I. Influence of carrier type on nitrification in the moving-bed biofilm process. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59:875-882.
20. Li C., Li Y., Cheng X., Feng L., Xi C., Zhang Y. Immobilization of Rhodococcus rhodochrous BX2 (an acetonitrile-degrading bacterium) with biofilm-forming bacteria for wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 131:390-396.
21. López-Palau S., Pinto A., Basset N., Dosta J., Mata-Álvarez J. ORP slope and feast-famine strategy as the basis of the control of a granular sequencing batch reactor treating winery wastewater. Biochem. Eng. J. 2012, 68:190-198.
22. Martin K.J., Nerenberg R. The membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) for water and wastewater treatment: principles, applications, and recent developments. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122:83-94.
23. Nacheva P.M., Chavez G.M. Wastewater treatment using a novel bioreactor with submerged packing bed of polyethylene tape. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 61:481-489.
24. Nguyen T.T., Ngo H.H., Guo W., Phuntsho S., Li J. A new sponge tray bioreactor in primary treated sewage effluent treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:5444-5447.
25. Nguyen D.D., Ngo H.H., Yoon Y.S. A new hybrid treatment system of bioreactors and electrocoagulation for superior removal of organic and nutrient pollutants from municipal wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 153:116-125.
26. Patsios S.I., Karabelas A.J. An investigation of the long-term filtration performance of a membrane bioreactor (MBR): The role of specific organic fractions. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 372:102-115.
27. Rajesh Banu J., Uan D.K., Yeom I.-T. Nutrient removal in an A2O-MBR reactor with sludge reduction. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:3820-3824.
28. Tadkaew N., Hai F.I., McDonald J.A., Khan S.J., Nghiem L.D. Removal of trace organics by MBR treatment: The role of molecular properties. Water Res. 2011, 45:2439-2451.
29. Tandukar M., Ohashi A., Harada H. Performance comparison of a pilot-scale UASB and DHS system and activated sludge process for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Res. 2007, 41:2697-2705.
30. Tarjányi-Szikora S., Oláh J., Makó M., Palkó G., Barkács K., Záray G. Comparison of different granular solids as biofilm carriers. Microchem. J. 2013, 107:101-107.
31. Tchobanoglous G., Burton F.L., Stensel H.D. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse 2004, Metcalf & Eddy Inc., McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
32. Trussell R.S., Merlo R.P., Hermanowicz S.W., Jenkins D. Influence of mixed liquor properties and aeration intensity on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor at high mixed liquor suspended solids concentrations. Water Res. 2007, 41:947-958.
33. Wu B., Yi S., Fane A.G. Effect of substrate composition (C/N/P ratio) on microbial community and membrane fouling tendency of biomass in membrane bioreactors. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2011, 47:440-445.
34. Yang S., Yang F., Fu Z., Lei R. Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2369-2374.
35. Zhang S., van Houten R., Eikelboom D.H., Doddema H., Jiang Z., Fan Y., Wang J. Sewage treatment by a low energy membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 90:185-192.