Enterprise Modelling and Integration: From fact modelling to enterprise interoperability

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 108, Issue , 2003, Pages 25-33

  Vernadat, Francois B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PIERS;

ACTIVITY MODELLING; CIM-OSA ARCHITECTURE; ENTERPRISE INTEROPERABILITY; ENTERPRISE MODELLING; ENTITY-RELATIONSHIP; INTER-ORGANISATIONAL; SEAMLESS INTEGRATION; SYSTEM INTEGRATION;

INTEROPERABILITY;

EID: 84904329709     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35621-1_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. ACM, (2002), Special issue on Ontology Applications and Design, Communications of the ACM, 45(2).
2. AMICE, (1993), CIMOSA: Open System Architecture for CIM, second revised and extended edition, Springer-Verlag.
3. Berio, G. Vemadat, F. B. (1999), New developments in enterprise modelling using CIMOSA, Computers in Industry, 40 (2-3): 99-114.
4. Biztalk (http://www. biztalk. org).
5. Bolero. net, http://www. bolero. net.
6. Deming, E. W. (1982), Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position, The MIT Press.
7. El Mhamedi, A. Sonntag, M. and Vemadat, F. B. (2000), Enterprise engineering using functional and socio-cognitive models, Engineering Cost and Valuation Analysis.
8. Fox, M. S. Groninger, M. (1998), Enterprise Modelling, AI Magazine, Fall, 109-121.
9. Goranson, H. T. (1992), Dimensions of Enterprise Integration, in Enterprise Integration Modeling (Petrie, C. Ed.), The MIT Press, pp. 101-113.
10. Harzallah, M. Vernadat, F. B. (2002), IT-based competency modeling and management: From theory to practice in enterprise engineering and operations, to appear in Computers in Industry.
11. IFAC-IFIP Task Force, (1999), GERAM: Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology, Version 1. 6, in ISO IS 15704, TC 184 SC5 WGI.
12. ISO/IEC DIS 19501-1, (2000), Information Technology-Unified Modelling Language (UML)-Part l: Specification.
13. Kosanke, K. Nell, J. G. (Eds.), (1997), Enterprise Engineering and Integration: Building International Consensus, Springer-Verlag.
14. Linthicum, D. S. (2000), Enterprise Application Integration, Addison-Wesley.
15. Martin, J. McClure, C. (1985), Structured Techniques for Computing, Prentice-Hall.
16. Nonaka, I. A. (1994), dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5, 4-37.
17. OAG. OAGIS, (2001), Open Applications Group Integration Specification, Open Application Group, Inc., Release 7. 2. 1, Doc. No. 2001l 031.
18. Petrie, C. (Ed.) (1992), Enterprise Integration Modeling, The MIT Press. RosettaNet, http://www. rosettanet. org.
19. Schelenoff, G. Groninger, M, Tissot, F. Valois, J. Lubell, J., Lee, J. (2000), The Process Specification Language (PSL): Overview and Version 1. 0 Specification, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NISI), Gaithersburg, MD. USA. SOAP, http://www. w3. org/TRISOAP.
20. Sowa, J. F., Zachman, J. A. 1992, A logic-based approach to Enterprise Integration, in Enterprise Integration Modeling (Petrie, C. Ed.), The MIT Press, pp. 152-163.
21. Tiwana, A. (2000), The Knowledge Management Toolkit. Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System, Prentice-Hall.
22. Vernadat, F. B. (1996), Enterprise Modeling and Integration: Principles and Applications, Chapman & Hall.
23. Vernadat, F. B. (2001), UEML: Towards a Unified Enterprise Modelling Language. Proc. 3eme Conference Francophone de Modelisation et Simulation (MOSIM'01), Troyes, France, 25-27 April, pp. 3-13.
24. Williams, T. J. (1992), The Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture, Instrument Society of America. XML. http://www. w3. org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.