A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of MARS MRI and ultrasound of the painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 375-382

  Siddiqui, Imran A ^a   Sabah, Shiraz A ^a   Satchithananda, Keshthra ^b   Lim, Adrian K ^b   Cro, Suzie ^c   Henckel, Johann ^a   Skinner, John A ^a   Hart, Alister J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c MRC CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PAIN; HIP PROSTHESIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT EFFUSION; MALE; METAL ARTIFACT REDUCTION SEQUENCE; METAL ON METAL HIP PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE ATROPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSEUDOTUMOR; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND SCANNER;

AGED; ARTHRALGIA; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTIFACTS; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; GRANULOMA, PLASMA CELL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULAR ATROPHY; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84904321958     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.908345     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Almousa S A, Greidanus N V, Masri B A, Duncan, Garbuz D S. The Natural History of Inflammatory Pseudotumors in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2013; (471) (12): 3814-21.
2. Bal B S, Lowe J A. Muscle damage in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: MRI evidence that it is not significant. Instr Course Lect 2008; 57: 223-9.
3. Davies A P, Willert H G, Campbell P A, Learmonth I D, Case C P. An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metalon- metal joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005; 87 (1): 18-27.
4. Douis H, Dunlop D J, Pearson A M, O'Hara J N, James S L. The role of ultrasound in the assessment of post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41 (9): 1035-46.
5. Fang C S, Harvie P, Gibbons C L, Whitwell D, Athanasou N A and Ostlere S. The imaging spectrum of peri-articular inflammatory masses following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37 (8): 715-22.
6. FDA (US Food and Drug Administration). Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Open Panel Meeting [Online]. June 2012 [Cited 2012 Oct 08]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/ CommitteesMeetingMaterials /MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/ OrthopaedicandRehabilitation- DevicesPanel/ucm309184.htm.
7. Foldes K, Gaal M, Balint P, Nemenyi K, Kiss C, Balint G P, Buchanan W W. Ultrasonography after hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 1992; 21 (5): 297-9.
8. Garcia F L, Picado C H, Nogueira-Barbosa M H. Sonographic evaluation of the abductor mechanism after total hip arthroplasty. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29 (3): 465-71.
9. Hart A J, Sabah S, Henckel J, Lewis A, Cobb J, Sampson B, Mitchell A, Skinner J A. The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91 (6): 738-44.
10. Hart A J, Satchithananda K, Liddle A D, Sabah S A, McRobbie D, Henckel J, Cobb J P, Skinner J A, Mitchell A W. Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: a case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2012; 94 (4): 317-25.
11. Kwon Y M, Ostlere S J, McLardy-Smith P, Athanasou N A, Gill H S, Murray D W. "Asymptomatic" pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence and metal ion study. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (4): 511-8.
12. Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (1): 159-74.
13. Liddle A D, Satchithananda K, Henckel J, Sabah S A, Vipulendran K V, Lewis A, Skinner J A, Mitchell A W, Hart A J. Revision of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in a tertiary center: a prospective study of 39 hips with between 1 and 4 years of follow-up. Acta Orthop 2013; 84 (3): 237-45.
14. Long S S, Surrey D, Nazarian L N. Common sonographic findings in the painful hip after hip arthroplasty. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31 (2): 301-12.
15. MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency). Medical Device Alert: All metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements (MDA/2012/036). [Online] 2012 [Cited 2012 Oct 08]. Available from: http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/ dts-bs/documents/medicaldeviceale rt/con155767.pdf.
16. Nishii T, Sakai T, Takao M, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Ultrasound screening of periarticular soft tissue abnormality around metal-on-metal bearings. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (6): 895-900.
17. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons C L, Ostlere S, Athanasou N, Gill H S, Murray D W. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90 (7): 847-51.
18. Sabah S A, Mitchell A W, Henckel J, Sandison A, Skinner J A, Hart A J. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in painful metal-on-metal hips: a prospective study. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (1): 71-6.
19. Siddiqui I A, Sabah S A, Satchithananda K, Lim A K, Henckel J, Skinner J A, Hart A J. Cross-sectional imaging of the metal-on-metal hip prosthesis: the London ultrasound protocol. Clin Radiol 2013; 68 (8): e472-8.
20. Smidt N, Rutjes A W, van der Windt D A, Ostelo R W, Reitsma J B, Bossuyt P M, Bouter L M, de Vet H C. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2005; 235( 2): 347-53.
21. Smith A J, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom A W. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 2012; 379 (9822): 1199-204.
22. Sofka C M, Haddad Z K, Adler R S. Detection of muscle atrophy on routine sonography of the shoulder. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23 (8): 1031-4.
23. Willert H G, Buchhorn G H, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Koster G, Lohmann C H. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005; 87 (1): 28-36.
24. Yanny S, Cahir J G, Barker T, Wimhurst J, Nolan J F, Goodwin R W, Marshall T, Toms A P. MRI of aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis-associated lesions in metal-on-metal hip replacements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198 (6): 1394-402.